Nociception helps agents protect and extend body lifespan
Nociception as a Control Primitive: Afferent Channels and Nociceptive Memory for Agents Deployed in One Body
Artificial Intelligence
Summary
This paper explores how an agent that controls one body can better protect itself from wear and damage without learning from repeated experiences. The authors show that adding a built-in pain signal (nociception) and memory of that pain helps the agent avoid costly damage and extend the body's useful life. Agents without memory don’t benefit as much since they can’t remember past pain signals. Simulations on thousands of virtual knees demonstrate that feeling and remembering damage leads to longer working life and more output.
What this means in practice
- •For robot designers: Design control systems for robots that use internal damage signals and memory to prolong operational lifetime in unpredictable environments.
- •For maintenance planners: Improve maintenance scheduling by modeling machines with nociception-like internal monitoring to better predict and avoid wear-based failures.
Tested on simulated data.
Authors
Wolfgang Maass
Abstract
An agent deployed in a single body cannot learn how fast that body wears, because every trial that would reveal its wear resistance wears the body it would protect. We study this \emph{epoch-one} setting, in which the parameters of a fixed-weight policy are set before the body is drawn and never updated in life. The agent carries a load-gated nociceptive channel and a memory that retains what was felt. We prove that felt cost moves the allocation to the best-\emph{paid} work not yet felt rather than the gentlest, that an agent without retention never sees the felt-cost constraint bind, and that the channel pays only where the threat is individually unpredictable, cheap to avoid and expensive to ignore. We measure per body, setting the agent with channel and memory against the same individual without them, where neither carries a schedule learned across lives. On $2{,}000$ simulated floor-layer knees, with wear anchored to published loss rates, feeling, retaining and substituting extends the working life from age $55.2$ to $59.6$ and raises career output from $33.7$ to $36.1$. $69.3\%$ of bodies gain and \textbf{none lose}. A body that feels but retains nothing past the day gains one of the $+4.4$ years, and retention carries the rest. A population-trained agent gains $+0.65$ years from the same channel at $-0.54$ output. The difference is what a species prior already supplies, and a single body has none. The two are related by an identity, the ablation mean reporting $(1-χ)$ of the per-body value with $χ$ the share a blind schedule already captures, so we report both. Where the regime map predicts value, a care robot sextuples its certified service life and a field-anchored fleet writes off $0.15$ of its machines instead of $0.55$. Where it predicts none, a rover gains little over blind caution, so the map holds in both directions.