Papers for

maintenance planners

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Chore sharing on trees ensures fair connected cost allocations

A rainbow partition theorem for trees and connected maximin share allocations of chores

Abstract: Xiao, Qiu, and Huang (AAMAS 2023) and independently Lonc (personal communication) asked whether indivisible chores located at the vertices of a tree can always be allocated to $n$ agents in connected bundles so that the cost of every agent is at most its connected maximin share; for goods, this is a theorem of Bouveret, Cechlárová, Elkind, Igarashi, and Peters. We answer the question affirmatively, even for monotone costs. The answer follows from a combinatorial theorem: if $\mathcal P_1,\ldots,\mathcal P_k$ are partitions of the vertex set of a finite tree, each into at most $k$ connected parts, then the vertex set can be split into disjoint sets $B_1,\ldots,B_k$, some possibly empty, such that each nonempty $B_i$ is connected and contained in a part of $\mathcal P_i$. Equivalently, if each of $k$ colours occurs on at most $k-1$ edges of a tree, then the vertices can be partitioned into connected sets labelled by distinct colours, none containing an edge of its own colour; in particular, one can choose for every colour a component of the forest obtained by deleting that colour so that the chosen components cover the tree. The bound is already best possible for paths, and for additive costs, the theorem is equivalent to the fair-division statement. The proof reduces the problem to inward partitions of oriented trees, which we obtain from the colourful KKM theorem on a simplex of edge weights, using a leaf-elimination labelling that remains compatible when weights vanish. We also give an algorithm running in time $k^{O(k)}$ plus polynomial time.

Tue 29 SeptDiscrete Mathematics
The gist
The paper looks at how to fairly divide chores that are connected like points on a tree, so each person’s share stays under a fair limit called the maximin share. Previous work showed this was possible for goods, and this work confirms it also works for chores, even when costs are uneven. The authors prove a mathematical rule about splitting trees into connected parts matching multiple partitions, which helps them guarantee fair chore divisions. They also provide an algorithm to find such divisions efficiently for a fixed number of people.
Open → 2609.38628v1

Nociception helps agents protect and extend body lifespan

Nociception as a Control Primitive: Afferent Channels and Nociceptive Memory for Agents Deployed in One Body

Abstract: An agent deployed in a single body cannot learn how fast that body wears, because every trial that would reveal its wear resistance wears the body it would protect. We study this \emph{epoch-one} setting, in which the parameters of a fixed-weight policy are set before the body is drawn and never updated in life. The agent carries a load-gated nociceptive channel and a memory that retains what was felt. We prove that felt cost moves the allocation to the best-\emph{paid} work not yet felt rather than the gentlest, that an agent without retention never sees the felt-cost constraint bind, and that the channel pays only where the threat is individually unpredictable, cheap to avoid and expensive to ignore. We measure per body, setting the agent with channel and memory against the same individual without them, where neither carries a schedule learned across lives. On $2{,}000$ simulated floor-layer knees, with wear anchored to published loss rates, feeling, retaining and substituting extends the working life from age $55.2$ to $59.6$ and raises career output from $33.7$ to $36.1$. $69.3\%$ of bodies gain and \textbf{none lose}. A body that feels but retains nothing past the day gains one of the $+4.4$ years, and retention carries the rest. A population-trained agent gains $+0.65$ years from the same channel at $-0.54$ output. The difference is what a species prior already supplies, and a single body has none. The two are related by an identity, the ablation mean reporting $(1-χ)$ of the per-body value with $χ$ the share a blind schedule already captures, so we report both. Where the regime map predicts value, a care robot sextuples its certified service life and a field-anchored fleet writes off $0.15$ of its machines instead of $0.55$. Where it predicts none, a rover gains little over blind caution, so the map holds in both directions.

Mon 28 SeptArtificial Intelligence
The gist
This paper explores how an agent that controls one body can better protect itself from wear and damage without learning from repeated experiences. The authors show that adding a built-in pain signal (nociception) and memory of that pain helps the agent avoid costly damage and extend the body's useful life. Agents without memory don’t benefit as much since they can’t remember past pain signals. Simulations on thousands of virtual knees demonstrate that feeling and remembering damage leads to longer working life and more output.
Open → 2609.34840v1

Planning limits failures while learning cuts costs in maintenance

Planning or Learning: Reliability and Cost in Multi-Asset Maintenance

Abstract: Industrial maintenance systems involve multiple interacting assets and shared resources, making it challenging to balance reliability and operational cost using a single decision framework. While recent work has focused on reinforcement learning (RL) for maintenance scheduling, direct comparisons with planning approaches under identical settings remain limited. In this work, we empirically compare planning and RL for multi-asset bearing maintenance using run-to-failure data. We examine how these methods behave when balancing preventive maintenance against tolerable failures across a range of failure penalty scenarios. We observed a consistent behavioral difference driven by objective formulation. Planning enforces reliability as a hard constraint and produces zero-failure policies whose total cost is largely insensitive to the magnitude of failure penalties. RL agents optimize expected cost and often trade off preventive maintenance against occasional failures as penalties vary, resulting in lower costs under low-penalty regimes but persistent non-zero failures even when penalties are high. We also investigate lightweight constraint mechanisms, including reward shaping and action masking, to encourage RL's reliability. From a practical perspective, planning may be more suitable when strict reliability is required and deployment horizons are short, whereas RL may provide cost-efficient policies when limited failures are acceptable and long-run operational efficiency is prioritized. Overall, this study clarifies the trade-offs between reliability and cost in multi-asset maintenance and suggests that planning and RL are complementary approaches. Beyond these findings, the controlled benchmark protocol itself that unifies environment, cost model, and evaluation across paradigms, offers a reusable template for comparing decision-making approaches in other maintenance settings.

Fri 11 SeptArtificial IntelligenceMachine Learning
The gist
Keeping machines running reliably without spending too much is a hard balancing act. The authors compare two ways to schedule maintenance: one plans with strict rules to avoid any failures, while the other learns from experience and sometimes accepts small failures to save money. Planning makes sure machines never fail but costs don’t change much even if failures are very expensive. Learning methods can save costs when failures aren’t a big deal but still have some failures even if they are costly. The authors suggest which method suits different needs and share a setup for others to test these approaches.
Open → 2609.13566v1

Two-machine scheduling made efficient despite machine downtime

An FPTAS for Two-Machine Open-Shop Scheduling with a Single Unavailability Interval

Abstract: We consider the two-machine open-shop scheduling problem in which one machine is unavailable during a fixed interval. We study the resumable setting: an operation interrupted by the unavailability interval may resume, without penalty, when the machine becomes available. The objective is to minimize the makespan. Although the problem is NP-hard and several approximation algorithms are known, whether it admits a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme (FPTAS) has remained open for two decades. We resolve this question affirmatively by giving the first FPTAS, thereby strengthening the previously known polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS). As an intermediate result, we develop a new pseudo-polynomial dynamic program with seven state dimensions, improving on the ten-dimensional formulation in the literature.

Thu 10 SeptDiscrete Mathematics
The gist
Scheduling jobs between two machines can get tricky when one machine is unavailable for a certain period. The problem gets harder when interrupted tasks can resume later without penalty. The authors found a new way to closely approximate the shortest total time to complete all jobs, solving a question that remained unanswered for 20 years. They improved on previous methods by simplifying the problem’s complexity, making the scheduling approach more efficient and practical.
Open → 2609.11693v1