Papers for

speech technology developers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Human annotation defines errors in Quran recitation transcripts

What Counts as a Mistake? Annotating Recitation Events in Quran Memorization Transcripts

Abstract: Checking Quran recitation from an ASR transcript requires distinguishing unresolved mistakes from repetitions, repairs, opening formulas and accepted spelling differences. We report a completed human annotation of 100 production recording cases: 348 scored units and 162 localized events across ten combined labels. An executable evaluator scores labels and word positions together. A plain diff reaches label-aware F1 0.525 and localization F1 0.826; adapted production cleaner/alignment components reach 0.518 and 0.786, with exact-span F1 0.505 for both. Correcting the adapter's word coordinates recovers all five annotated repetition events, showing why annotation interfaces must be checked before interpreting baseline failures. In a preliminary pilot, eight single 20-minute runs across three coding agents and eight models span label-aware F1 0.143 to 0.892: seven land far above every baseline, and one collapses below the naive diff from a missing normalization step. Across the six, 970 of 972 gold-event instances draw an overlapping prediction, so what remains is not detection but convention: span extent, and the labels whose boundary is stipulated by adjudication rather than visible in the text. Seven of 162 events defeat all six same-day runs, five of them one orthographic rule, and the strongest run still misses the same ones. No run annotated before building, so the pilot measures the algorithm half of the task only.

Thu 10 SeptComputation and Language
The gist
Checking mistakes in Quran recitations using automatic speech transcripts is tricky because some errors look like normal repetitions or accepted spelling differences. The authors created detailed human annotations to label different event types in 100 recordings and tested several algorithms to score these. They found that distinguishing true mistakes from other events depends on clear rules about error labeling and span boundaries. This work helps improve how automatic systems understand Quran recitations by clarifying what counts as a mistake versus other speech events.
Open 2609.12085v1

Audio models reveal hidden errors in code switched English Yoruba speech

Beyond Word Error Rate: A Switch Aware Evaluation of ASR and Audio Language Models on English Yoruba Code-Switched Speech

Abstract: Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems and audio language models (audio LMs) now report low error rates on monolingual benchmarks, but their behavior on code switched speech in low resource, diacritic rich languages remains poorly characterized. We present a switch aware evaluation of eleven modern systems (six ASR models and five audio LMs) on English Yoruba code-switched speech, using a deterministic 2000 utterance evaluation set and a shared scoring pipeline. Beyond word error rate (WER), we report switch localized diagnostics: a switch entry token error rate (SETER), windowed switch point error rates, language specific error rates, and a diacritic insensitive WER. Our central finding is that aggregate WER hides code switching behavior. The best system by WER (an ASR model) is statistically indistinguishable from a leading audio LM on WER, yet the audio LM is significantly better on every switch localized metric. Across faithful systems, Yoruba token recognition collapses (error 0.97 for almost all systems) while English tokens are recognized far better, and errors concentrate sharply at switches into Yoruba. Several generative audio LMs fail as exact transcribers, producing translation, verbosity, and prompt leakage that are strongly prompt dependent. We release manifests, metric implementations, and evaluation scripts to support reproducible, switch aware benchmarking for African code switched speech.

Thu 10 SeptComputation and LanguageArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Speech recognition systems usually perform well on single languages, but this paper shows that when people mix English and Yoruba in the same sentence, the usual error scores don’t tell the full story. The authors tested eleven modern speech systems on mixed English-Yoruba speech and found that while overall error rates look good, these systems struggle to recognize Yoruba words correctly and make many mistakes at language switching points. Some systems even add extra words or change the meaning depending on how the test questions are framed. The authors provide tools to better measure these mistakes in mixed language speech.
Open 2609.11786v1

Low-resource multilingual text-to-speech systems struggle with complex texts

Complex-Text Robustness Evaluation and Failure Diagnosis for Low-Resource Multilingual Text-to-Speech

Abstract: Low-resource multilingual text-to-speech (TTS) systems have expanded language coverage, but their robustness under complex text inputs remains insufficiently diagnosed. Existing evaluations mainly focus on naturalness, speaker similarity, and content consistency using regular test sentences, while providing limited insight into how multilingual TTS systems fail when handling challenging inputs such as numbers, dates, named entities, long sentences, code-switched expressions, and punctuation-related structures. This paper proposes a complex-text robustness diagnosis framework for low-resource multilingual TTS. We evaluate robustness from three dimensions: content consistency, language consistency, and generation stability. A multilingual robustness testing scheme is designed for Thai, Vietnamese, Swahili, and Indonesian, covering ordinary sentences and multiple types of complex text inputs. We further introduce automatic diagnostic metrics, including character error rate, language identification accuracy, and duration abnormal rate. To support input-level risk analysis before speech generation, we propose a lightweight Text Risk Score (TRS), which estimates synthesis risk from interpretable text features without manual annotation or model training. Experiments on three representative multilingual TTS systems, including OmniVoice, VoxCPM2, and MMS-TTS, show that complex text inputs expose systematic failure patterns that are not fully reflected by ordinary short-sentence evaluation. Different systems exhibit distinct vulnerabilities in number normalization, named entity handling, long-text generation, and code-switched input processing. Furthermore, TRS shows a positive correlation with content errors and duration abnormalities, demonstrating its usefulness as a low-cost pre-synthesis indicator for complex-text risk diagnosis in low-resource multilingual TTS.

Thu 10 SeptComputation and LanguageSound
The gist
Text-to-speech systems that work in many languages but with limited data often have trouble reading complicated texts correctly. The authors created a way to test how well these systems handle tricky inputs like numbers, dates, and mixed languages. They introduced a simple score to predict when the system might make mistakes before actually generating speech. Testing on several popular systems showed specific weaknesses that normal tests don’t catch. This new evaluation method helps find and understand failures in multilingual speech synthesis.
Open 2609.11545v1

Articulatory models enable clear measurement of accent differences

Flexible and Interpretable Accent Distance Measurements

Abstract: Determining the differences between two speakers' accents is a fundamental task in linguistics and speech technology research. The methodology used to measure these differences depends on the specific research area. A phonetics researcher may demonstrate accent variation by comparing vowel formants in paired recordings of individual words. These results will be interpretable, but the recordings will be time-consuming to collect and may not be representative of connected speech. Accented Text-to-Speech (TTS) research has pushed towards using accent embeddings derived from accent classification tasks. These embeddings can be produced from any speech recording, but are not readily interpretable. In this paper, we demonstrate that articulatory representations created through articulatory inversion can be used as an interpretable basis for accent comparison and that optimal transport provides a framework for accent comparison across arbitrary recording types.

Thu 10 SeptArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Measuring how different one person's accent is from another's can be tricky and depends on how you do it. The authors show that using models of how speech sounds are physically made in the mouth gives a way to compare accents that is both flexible and easy to understand. They also use a mathematical method called optimal transport to compare these speech features from any kind of recording. This provides a new way to study accents without needing special recordings or losing clarity about what the differences mean.
Open 2609.11458v1

Speaker diarization errors split to clarify pause ambiguity effects

Diarization Error Decomposition Under Pause Annotation Ambiguity

Abstract: Speaker diarization evaluation is sensitive to ambiguity in pause annotation, which can inflate diarization error rate (DER) or obscure genuine model errors. We show that morphological closing, which has been used for pause-tolerant diarization evaluation, discards segment-level distinctions. Instead, we propose an exact, overlap-aware decomposition of standard DER into a pause-attributable component, consisting of errors compatible with pause filling, and a residual core component that can serve as a proxy for intrinsic diarization errors. The decomposition leaves DER unchanged, while the pause-attributable and core components vary monotonically with the pause threshold and eventually saturate. Experiments spanning synthetic transformations, annotation mismatch, cross-domain evaluation, and tight-boundary diarization show that the decomposition reveals error sources not apparent from standard DER.

Thu 10 SeptSound
The gist
Speaker diarization means figuring out who spoke when in an audio recording. Sometimes, pauses between speakers are marked differently, which can make error rates look worse or hide real mistakes. The authors found that a common way to handle pauses loses important details about segments. They created a new method that breaks down errors into those caused by pause ambiguities and the core diarization mistakes, helping to better understand what went wrong.
Open 2609.11007v1

Audio visual speech recognition benchmark captures natural dialogues

Candor-LR: A Dyadic Conversational Dataset for Audio-Visual Speech Recognition

Abstract: Current audio-visual speech recognition (AVSR) benchmarks, like LRS3, rely heavily on clean, scripted and rehearsed speech. They fail to reflect the complexity of natural conversation, which involves overlapping speech, spontaneous turn-taking, unscripted vocabulary and variable acoustic conditions. To shift the field toward realistic dialogue, we introduce Candor-LR, a conversational benchmark derived from the CANDOR corpus of 1,656 natural dyadic videoconferences. Our custom data preparation pipeline yields 713.5, 10.1, and 60.1 hours of training, validation, and test data, respectively. Evaluating pretrained AVSR models on Candor-LR reveals that audio-only accuracy drops sharply compared to LRS3, but visual cues compensate effectively, driving much larger performance gains on Candor-LR than on LRS3. Furthermore, training on this corpus significantly improves cross-domain robustness under both clean and noisy conditions, as its realistic conversational data captures broader audio-video features. We open-source our pipeline to ensure reproducibility, establishing Candor-LR as a challenging benchmark for conversational AVSR.

Wed 9 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionMultimedia
The gist
Speech recognition systems often struggle with natural conversations because most tests use clean, scripted speech. The authors created Candor-LR, a large dataset of real video conversations that include overlapping speech and spontaneous dialogue. They found that recognizing speech from audio alone becomes harder in these real scenarios, but adding visual lip-reading helps a lot. Training models with this dataset also makes them work better across different noisy conditions.
Open 2609.10394v1

Frozen gabor kernels improve speech recognition for many languages

Orukeet: Multilingual ASR with Frozen Gabor Kernels

Abstract: Orukeet replaces half of an adapted Parakeet encoder's temporal filters with 12,288 fitted Gabor kernels, freezes these replacements, and trains the remaining parameters on multilingual and multi-accent data. Final adaptation and checkpoint selection use LibriSpeech test-other. Across 20,146 FLEURS recordings in 25 languages, pooled word error rate (WER) falls from Parakeet's 11.01% to Orukeet's 9.85%, a 10.6% relative reduction. Orukeet has lower WER on 23 of the 25 languages. Orukeet outperforms Parakeet on 61 out of 74 tested splits, including LibriSpeech test-clean (1.46% vs. 1.53% WER), test-other (2.86% vs. 3.14%), and FLEURS English (3.82% vs. 4.28%). All comparisons decode the same audio with matched NeMo settings. The fitted kernels are stored as ordinary convolution weights, retaining Parakeet's architecture and inference operators.

Wed 9 SeptSoundMachine Learning
The gist
Speech recognition systems try to understand spoken words from audio recordings, but doing this well across many languages and accents is challenging. The authors replaced part of an existing speech recognition model with special filters called Gabor kernels, which they fixed so they wouldn’t change during training. This approach helped the system understand speech better in 25 languages and multiple accents, reducing error rates consistently. Their improved model works within the same overall system, so it can be used just like before but with better accuracy.
Open 2609.10054v1

SpeechAnnotator offers context-aware system for detailed speech labeling

SpeechAnnotator: A Context-Aware Multi-Agent Framework and Benchmark for Multidimensional Speech Annotation

Abstract: Recent controllable speech generation requires training data with fine-grained annotations of speaker traits, prosody, emotion, paralinguistic cues, acoustic scenes, and context. Existing workflows often rely on manual correction, paid hosted multimodal services, or fixed processing chains, which limits large-scale data processing through annotation cost, external-service dependence, or weak cross-stage recovery. We introduce SpeechAnnotator, a locally deployable, context-aware multi-agent framework built entirely from open-source models and tools. Supporting frontend modules first obtain speaker-aware segments and final segment transcripts, while prior evidence extractors attach heterogeneous segment-level cues. Three specialist agents then collaborate through shared state: the Planning Agent converts local audio evidence, speaker history, neighboring segments, and recording-level context into field-specific contracts; the Labeling Agent performs contract-guided multimodal prediction for directly observable attributes; and the Review Agent runs a bounded review loop that checks evidence support and cross-segment consistency, triggering relabeling only for unsupported or inconsistent fields. To address the fragmentation of existing evaluation resources across isolated tasks and narrow-domain test sets, we introduce SpeechAnnotator-Bench (SA-Bench), containing 8.87 hours of human-annotated audio across nine source formats, together with SpeechAnnotator-Eval (SA-Eval), which separates Timeline-Eval for speaker-aware timeline recovery, Closed-Eval for finite-set attributes, and Open-Eval for open-ended attributes. Experiments and ablations show that SpeechAnnotator provides a locally deployable alternative to commercial audio-capable systems, while the bounded review loop improves multidimensional annotation through evidence- and context-aware field-level recovery.

Wed 9 SeptSound
The gist
Detailed labeling of speech recordings is important for training computers to understand and generate natural speech with emotion and different voices. Existing methods rely on manual work or paid tools, which can be slow, costly, or inflexible. The authors created SpeechAnnotator, a system that uses multiple open-source AI agents working together to analyze speech with its context and check their work for consistency. They also built a set of tests and datasets to measure how well such systems perform. Their approach offers an open, locally usable alternative to commercial systems and improves speech annotation quality by focusing on evidence and context.
Open 2609.09947v1

Speech benchmark exposes gaps in Southeast Asian language AI

SEA-SpeechBench: A Large-Scale Multitask Benchmark for Speech Understanding Across Southeast Asia

Abstract: The rapid advancement of audio and multimodal large language models has unlocked transformative speech understanding capabilities, yet evaluation frameworks remain predominantly English-centric, leaving Southeast Asian (SEA) languages critically underrepresented. We introduce SEA-SpeechBench, to the best of our knowledge, the first large-scale multitask benchmark that evaluates speech understanding in 11 SEA languages through 97,194 samples across 99 evaluation sets and 597 hours of curated audio data. Our benchmark comprises 9 diverse tasks across 3 categories: speech processing (automatic speech recognition, speech translation, spoken question answering), paralinguistic analysis (emotion, gender, age, speaker recognition), and temporal understanding, a novel dimension featuring timestamped content queries and temporal localization within extended audio sequences up to 3 minutes. We implement multilingual prompting in both native SEA languages and English to reflect user interactions with audio-language models. Evaluation of leading open-source and proprietary systems reveals marked performance gaps. Across all models, performance remains underwhelming on temporal understanding, emotion recognition, and speech translation. Prompting in low-resource languages such as Burmese and Tamil lags behind English by up to 41 percentage points. Our findings expose critical model limitations and underscore the need for inclusive model development. The SEA-SpeechBench benchmark is available at https://zwenyu.github.io/SEA-SpeechBench/.

Wed 9 SeptComputation and Language
The gist
Current speech AI systems mostly focus on English and struggle with many Southeast Asian languages. The authors created a large test set called SEA-SpeechBench to measure how well AI understands speech in 11 Southeast Asian languages. They found that existing models often perform poorly, especially on tasks like understanding emotions, translating speech, and answering questions about timing in conversations. This shows there's a big need to improve speech AI in less-studied languages.
Open 2609.09672v1

BuzzASR improves speech recognition for 102 individual languages

BuzzASR: A Swarm of 100+ Monolingual Speech Recognition Models

Abstract: We introduce BuzzASR, a collection of language-specialized fine-tuned Whisper models adapted for automatic speech recognition (ASR) in 102 languages. Large end-to-end Transformer-based ASR models such as Whisper have revolutionized ASR, but most prominent models are highly multilingual. As a result, these models often perform poorly on languages less well-represented in their training set. While it has long been known that effective language adaptation can be achieved through simple fine-tuning on monolingual data, this strategy has only been applied to a small number of languages. We massively scale up this simple approach to 102 languages covered in the FLEURS dataset, while also implementing a more complex language adaptation strategy that integrates monolingual tokenizer replacement and data augmentation using text-only fine-tuning. BuzzASR models outperform Whisper-large-v3 on 77 out of 102 languages, reducing character error rates (CER) by a factor of over 2.8 on average. Our models achieve state-of-the-art CER among open-source systems on 27 of 102 languages on the combined FLEURS and Common Voice test set. Our tokenizer replacement strategy yields an average 3.3x improvement in compression rate (characters per token) over Whisper's multilingual BPE, with gains of up to 21.7x. We release all models, code, and detailed results: https://lemn-lab.github.io/buzz-asr

Wed 9 SeptComputation and Language
The gist
Speech recognition systems that handle many languages at once often don’t work well for less common languages. The authors created BuzzASR, a group of speech recognition models each fine-tuned specifically for one language. This approach greatly improves accuracy in recognizing speech for 102 languages by adjusting the model and its text processing part for each language. BuzzASR outperforms the original multilingual model on most tested languages and is publicly available for use.
Open 2609.09554v1

E-branchformer improves audio deepfake detection with local and global features

Disentangled Global-Local Feature Learning with E-Branchformer for Audio Deepfake Detection

Abstract: The rapid advancement of voice synthesis technologies such as text-to-speech and voice conversion poses significant threats to speech-based authentication systems, necessitating robust deepfake detection methods. In this work, we propose a novel E-Branchformer-based architecture that effectively leverages self-supervised speech representations for audio deepfake detection. Our model employs parallel branches to simultaneously capture global contextual dependencies through multi-head self-attention and local temporal patterns through convolutional processing. To enhance discriminative capability, we integrate depthwise convolution and Squeeze-and-Excitation modules that enrich the classification token with refined patch token information after feature merging. Extensive experiments on ASVspoof 2021 LA, DF, and In-the-Wild datasets demonstrate state-of-the-art performance with equal error rates of 0.88%, 1.85%, and 6.30% respectively, substantially outperforming existing methods. Comprehensive ablation studies validate that the dual-branch architecture provides complementary discriminative information, Squeeze-and-Excitation Aggregation significantly improves SSL feature integration, and the combination of DWConv and SE modules is critical for effective class token enhancement. The superior performance on real-world scenarios demonstrates strong generalization capability to diverse acoustic conditions and unseen spoofing attacks.

Tue 8 SeptSound
The gist
Voice cloning technology can trick systems that recognize real human voices. This paper presents a new tool called E-Branchformer that listens to audio and checks if it is fake or not. It looks at the sound in two ways at the same time—catching the overall picture and the small details. Tests show this method works better than previous ones on different collections of voice recordings. The design helps it detect fake voices even in new, tricky situations.
Open 2609.08948v1