Papers for

sensor network engineers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Metadata improves learning from mixed sparse data sources by aligning coordinates

Can Metadata Fix the Gauge? Calibration Turns Sparse Multi-Source Learning from Sparse PCA into Sparse Mean Recovery

Abstract: Source labels tell us where a sample came from, but not how that source oriented its coordinates. In a sparse Gaussian multi-source model with source-specific sign gauges, that distinction changes the learning problem. Without calibration, pooling across sources erases the mean signal, and the source-labelled experiment reduces to sparse PCA. With task-independent relative-gauge metadata, synchronization aligns sources and the same observations become a sparse mean problem. We formalize the value of metadata through AlignedMass, which quantifies how much first-order signal a metadata-induced alignment restores. Source labels create only limited AlignedMass, whereas valid calibration can create AlignedMass proportional to the full sample size. This yields a statistical separation in micro-source regimes and, under standard sparse-PCA hardness assumptions, a computational separation as well. Synthetic experiments check the predicted scaling; controlled real-feature and physical sensor studies examine sign cancellation, separately acquired calibration, and reuse across tasks.

Mon 19 OctMachine Learning
The gist
When combining data from different sources, the way each source measures or orients data can vary and hide important signals. The authors show that without adjusting for these differences, it’s like trying to find a pattern in a noisy puzzle. But using extra information about how sources align helps to recover those hidden signals much better. This makes it easier to identify key features from combined data, especially when signals are weak or sparse.
Open → 2610.25663v1

Graph neural networks handle missing data linked across connected nodes

When Missingness Follows the Graph: Beyond Feature Propagation for Missing Features

Abstract: Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) commonly assume that node features are fully observed, despite missing features being pervasive in real-world applications. By leveraging the dependence between node features and graph structure, existing graph-specific methods handle missingness by propagating observed feature values along graph edges. However, these methods have mainly been evaluated in overly optimistic settings, where feature entries are removed independently and uniformly across the graph. This overlooks realistic scenarios in which missingness propagates among connected nodes, as can occur during localized sensing failures in sensor networks. We formalize this complementary notion as graph-structured mask dependence, where the joint distribution of missingness indicators is shaped by the graph, and introduce a controlled mechanism that instantiates this setting. We study propagation-based methods theoretically and empirically in this setting, showing that their effectiveness changes substantially compared with the uniformly random regime. Motivated by this limitation, we propose PEMix, designed to remain effective under challenging graph-structured missingness. Rather than propagating observed values, PEMix uses global structural representations to condition a probabilistic model of incomplete node features before message passing. Experiments under controlled graph-structured missingness and naturally occurring missingness show that PEMix remains robust across complex missingness regimes, with particularly strong performance as missingness becomes severe.

Tue 13 OctMachine LearningArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Graphs often have missing information on their nodes, but traditional methods assume all data is present. The authors show that existing techniques work less well when missing data happens in clusters along connected nodes, like when sensors fail together. They introduce a new approach called PEMix that better guesses missing information by using the graph’s overall structure instead of just spreading known values. Their experiments show PEMix is more reliable, especially when a lot of data is missing in connected regions.
Open → 2610.18113v1

Weighted beeping networks improve local broadcast with signal strength

Weighted Beeping Networks

Abstract: Beeping Networks (BN) have become an established model of wireless communication and computation. They assume, however, that the communication interference caused by beeping nodes is binary (OR channel), while both artificial and nature-driven networks are based on varied signal strength and receiving thresholds. This work naturally extends the classic beeping networks to weighted beeping networks (WBN), by modeling signal strengths by weights on graph edges and receiving a beep if the accumulative signal strengths of transmitting neighbors are above receiving threshold. Under this generalized model, we study the fundamental Local Broadcast (LB) problem. Since edges with low weights may not even accumulate to a received beep, we only require that messages are delivered along sufficiently heavy edges, with weights above some given threshold $σ$. We design an LB algorithm that completes its task in $O(I_σ\log n \cdot (\mathcal{M}+\log n))$ beeping rounds, whp, where $n$ is the number of nodes, $I_σ$ is the maximum local interference on heavy edges, and $\mathcal{M}$ is the maximum length of messages sent locally. This result is nearly optimal, as, with probability $1$, $Ω(I_σ)$ beeping rounds are necessary to solve LB. Finally, we show that any algorithm designed for the classic beeping networks and terminating in polynomial number of beeping rounds, can be emulated on any WBN with a logarithmic overhead, that is, it returns the same output as working on the classic beeping network isomorphic to the sub-graph of heavy edges.

Sat 10 OctDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing
The gist
Traditional beeping networks assume that a beep either happens or doesn't, but in real wireless systems signals can be stronger or weaker. This paper extends that simple model by assigning weights to connections, so a beep is heard only if the combined signal strength reaches a threshold. The authors design an algorithm that efficiently broadcasts messages in this weighted setting, proving it is almost as fast as possible. They also show how older algorithms can work in this new model with some extra effort.
Open → 2610.15068v1

Decentralized sensing systems verify collected evidence for accurate targets

Pathwise Information Certificates for Decentralized Adaptive Sensing

Abstract: We study decentralized adaptive sensing, where multiple agents choose measurements from evolving local beliefs while exchanging information over a communication graph. We ask whether the measurements actually selected by an adaptive policy have collected enough evidence to distinguish the true target from every plausible alternative. We develop a pathwise certificate based on the Rényi--Chernoff information accumulated along the realized sensing trajectory. It yields nonasymptotic MAP-error bounds and an anytime, network-wide stopping rule for arbitrary history-dependent sensing policies, while separating accumulated statistical information from a bounded network-mixing transient. Linear growth of the information against the least-resolved competitor implies exponential decay of MAP and squared-localization error. A classical pairwise KL converse, specialized to the adaptive decentralized transcript, shows that insufficient information on any pair prevents a positive uniform error exponent, confirming the hardest competitor as a fundamental bottleneck. Across policies, graph topologies, sensor profiles, and seeds, the worst-competitor score correlates more strongly with localization speed than an average-pair proxy in both 1D ($r=0.89$ versus $0.40$) and structured 2D sensing ($r=0.77$ versus $0.48$). Our results provide a practical way to certify and diagnose adaptive multi-agent sensing systems using the evidence they actually collect.

Wed 7 OctInformation TheoryMachine Learning
The gist
This paper looks at groups of sensors working together without a central controller to find a target. The authors show a way to check if the series of measurements really gives enough proof to identify the correct target among many possibilities. Their method helps decide when to stop sensing, based on the information gathered so far. They also find that focusing on the hardest-to-distinguish competitor improves how fast sensors can pinpoint the target. This gives a practical way to monitor and improve adaptive sensing networks while they run.
Open → 2610.10362v1

Low communication distributed optimization via scalar messages

Scalar Communication via Random Direction Refreshing for Distributed Optimization

Abstract: Distributed optimization over networks requires agents to repeatedly exchange decision variables with their neighbors. When the decision dimension $d$ is large, these exchanges dominate the communication cost, which is critical for bandwidth-constrained agents. Existing remedies quantize or sparsify the exchanged vectors, yet each message still scales with $d$ and the compression error must be compensated by additional states. To address this limitation, we propose a scalar-communication mechanism in which every neighbor message carries a single real number regardless of $d$. Agents regenerate a common random direction from a shared seed, transmit only the inner product of their state with that direction, and act on the resulting rank-one surrogate of their neighbors' states while retaining full local gradients. We develop and analyze the mechanism for an existing continuous-time distributed optimization algorithm. For strongly convex local costs with Lipschitz gradients, we show that the optimizer remains the unique consensus equilibrium, that a fixed direction admits spurious equilibria, and that refreshing the direction at a sufficiently high rate yields exponential mean-square and almost-sure convergence with constant gains and no residual error. The framework admits any isotropic fixed-norm direction distribution, including Rademacher, scaled-coordinate, and sphere-normalized Gaussian directions; all three attain lower fresh-encoding variance than unnormalized Gaussian directions. The effects of the direction distribution and the refresh interval are illustrated in~simulations.

Mon 5 OctMultiagent Systems
The gist
When groups of computers work together to solve problems, they usually share lots of numbers back and forth, which can overload their communication channels. The authors propose a way for each computer to send just a single number to its neighbors, no matter how big the problem is. They use shared random directions so each computer can still understand the information with less data. Their approach keeps the problem-solving accurate and efficient even when sending much less information.
Open → 2610.05666v1

Framework enables smooth differentiation of zigzag persistent homology

A differentiability framework for zigzag persistent homology via linear interpolation

Abstract: Persistent homology can be differentiated and incorporated into learning pipelines, but no analogous framework exists for zigzag persistence, which is needed when the underlying topological structure evolves non-monotonically over time. We develop such a framework for sequences of simplicial complexes obtained by thresholding time-dependent filtering values on a fixed complex. By assigning persistence diagram endpoints the real-valued times at which linearly interpolated filtering values cross the threshold, we transfer the continuity of the filtering values to the diagram points. This yields smooth local lifts of the resulting persistence-diagram-valued map, from which we derive differentials almost everywhere under mild regularity conditions on the parametrization of the filtering values. We prove local Lipschitz continuity outside an explicit measure-zero exclusion set; standard stochastic subgradient convergence guarantees therefore do not apply directly. We argue that, even without such guarantees, this exclusion set is small enough in practice to allow effective optimization. We test this empirically in two experiments: sensor network coverage optimization and dynamic graph classification.

Wed 30 SeptMachine LearningComputational Geometry
The gist
Persistent homology is a tool used to study shapes and patterns that change over time, but existing methods only work when the changes are always in one direction. The authors developed a way to handle situations where these shapes and patterns can grow and shrink non-linearly, using something called zigzag persistence. They created a smooth mathematical method that links changes in data values to changes in the shape's features, allowing this information to be used in machine learning. Their framework is tested on sensor networks and dynamic graphs, showing it can help improve monitoring and classification tasks.
Open → 2609.39242v1

Topological signal processing handles unoriented higher-order data better

Topological Signal Processing With Unoriented Operators

Abstract: Topological signal processing (TSP) processes signals on simplicial complexes with oriented boundary operators, which is the natural choice for flow signals or when the topological invariants play a role for the task at hand. However, many higher-order signals carry no orientation, and applying oriented operators to them is not well-defined since it introduces an arbitrary choice of simplex orientation. We study an unoriented TSP (UTSP) framework that replaces oriented boundaries with unoriented incidence matrices. First, we show that unoriented incidence and Laplacian matrices between arbitrary simplicial levels admit graph-like spectral properties. Second, since dropping orientation removes the Hodge decomposition, we introduce an unoriented counterpart, termed interaction-order decomposition, which quantifies how much of a higher-order signal is explained by aggregating lower-order signals. Third, we use this decomposition to derive regularizers for signal reconstruction that penalize each interaction order separately. Experiments on real-world data show that the order-aware regularizers outperform oriented baselines, with the largest gains when the signal energy is unevenly distributed across orders.

Mon 21 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Topological signal processing typically uses orientations to analyze data spread over shapes made of connected points, lines, and triangles. But many signals don't have a clear direction, making traditional tools unreliable. The authors created a new version that works without needing the direction, using a new way to break down signals. This method can better reconstruct data by understanding how signals at different levels combine, especially when signal strengths vary a lot.
Open → 2609.25310v1