power system engineers

Abstract: Learned surrogates for power-flow (PF) computation are usually motivated by speed, compared against a single CPU-based baseline. We show this comparison is fragile: across 7 open-source CPU-based solvers evaluated on identical inputs, throughput varies by roughly 2.5-3 orders of magnitude, so the choice of baseline alone can flip the conclusion. We build a benchmark spanning 9 physics-based solvers: 7 CPU-based and 2 GPU-based, including a new batched GPU solver, gumsim2grid - and 3 published ML surrogates, evaluated under a shared, independently implemented KCL-mismatch check across 15 grids from 14 to 70,000 buses. On the PF task itself, a sufficiently parallelized CPU solver or gpusim2grid matches or exceeds the throughput of the ML surrogates we test while remaining orders of magnitude more accurate; we find no evidence that these GNN-style surrogates are yet competitive for PF specifically, though prior work reports genuine gains on related but more combinatorial tasks such as optimal power flow or power grid control. Beyond this finding, we hope the benchmark suite, code and reference evaluator released at https://github.com/Grid2op/gpusim2grid helps close a broader reproducibility gap in this space, where batched GPU-based PF solvers are rarely open-sourced or evaluated against a common set of baselines.

Abstract: Open electromagnetic-transient datasets are beginning to make reproducible learning-based protection studies possible, but the practical use of these datasets still requires application-level benchmarks that define timing, sensing, and validation assumptions. This paper presents an initial application benchmark on the recently released PROTECT-90 dataset for two protection-oriented tasks: fault-type classification and discrete faulted-line identification. A compact one-dimensional convolutional neural network (CNN) is evaluated using post-inception windows of 0.25, 0.5, 1, and 2 cycles under strict episode-wise splitting. A non-convolutional multilayer perceptron (MLP) is also trained as an architecture-control baseline. The results show that both tasks are nearly saturated under full observability, with one-cycle test accuracies of 99.84% for fault type and 100.00% for line identification. The main performance variation appears under reduced observability: current-only inputs preserve line identification accuracy at 100.00%, whereas voltage-only inputs reduce line identification accuracy to 53.09% with the CNN and 50.57% with the MLP. This indicates that the limiting factor is measurement information rather than neural architecture. Additional stratified checks show stable performance across topology states and fault-resistance bins, while CPU inference contributes only 0.528 ms to the one-cycle total decision time of 20.53 ms.

Abstract: This paper introduces tellegen, an open source framework for interactive power flow (PF) and optimal power flow (OPF) studies that run in the browser. This provides intuitive and democratized access to power system analysis tools compiled to WebAssembly. A user can drag and drop a case file, click and drag to change a nodal demand or line rating, preview the impacts via sensitivity analysis, and obtain an exact re-solve on release. User case files and results stay entirely on the device: tellegen transmits zero Critical Energy/Electric Infrastructure Information (CEII). The framework comprises a core numerical engine for PF and OPF, reusable browser components, saved studies, and structured WebMCP tools for agentic interaction. We evaluate the transmission OPF solver by comparing objectives with PGLib baselines; the distribution PF solver by comparing voltages and currents with OpenDSS; and the WebAssembly execution times by comparing with PowerModels.jl. On realistic synthetic grids, WebAssembly OPF solves take only 25-43% longer than native binary solves. The implementation shows how an engineer can distribute an executable numerical study as a URL, reducing installation and hosting requirements while keeping case data local.

Abstract: Studies of machine-learning-based power system protection are difficult to compare because task definitions, measurement access, data partitions, metrics, and generalization conditions often differ. EvEMTBench addresses this gap with an open, executable, and versioned benchmark that fixes these evaluation choices while leaving model design open. Across four grids spanning 20-345 kV, it defines 12 protection and event-analysis functions instantiated as 24 scored tasks and supports structured evaluation across observability conditions, predefined distribution shifts, and zero-shot and fine-tuned cross-grid transfer. Committed partitions, leakage controls, and reproducible reporting provide a common basis for comparing future methods. A reference evaluation spanning trivial, conventional, feature-based, and deep-learning baselines shows that wider observability is not uniformly beneficial, shifted conditions can reveal failures not apparent in-distribution, and cross-grid transfer is substantially stronger for fault detection than for fault localization. Protection-relevant diagnostics identify failure modes not apparent from primary metrics alone. EvEMTBench therefore makes generalization in machine-learning-based protection an explicit and reproducible evaluation problem.

Abstract: Renewable energy systems and electrified transport have found widespread adoption in recent years. The integration of these non-linear loads, dominated by electric vehicle (EV) charging, however, has introduced severe harmonic distortion into the power grid, impacting the efficiency and lifetime of substation equipment and switchgear in the distribution network. Rapid and high-precision harmonic analysis has hence become a prerequisite for effective harmonic control at the source of injection. This paper proposes an Efficient Broad Learning (EBL) framework for distributed adaptive harmonic estimation. As a quantised FPGA acceleration framework for BLS-style harmonic estimation, it offers high-accuracy estimation with half-cycle input, reconfigurable flexibility enabled by the FPGA implementation, and ultra-low latency, achieving 17.4 $\times$ faster predictions than the nearest reported FPGA method. For harmonic prediction across multi-scenario charging and discharging nodes, the online transfer learning based on a closed-form solution rather than backpropagation in EBL demonstrates rapid adaptability. By exploiting bespoke quantisation and sparsity, the approach consumes 5.9\% of the LUTs on the Zynq Ultrascale+ ZU7EV FPGA, using $\approx$ 82\% of the LUTs required by the state-of-the-art FPGA-accelerated estimator.