Papers for

materials engineers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Learning to predict 3D dislocation structures from X-ray patterns

Inferring Dislocation Microstructures from X-ray Diffraction via Cross-Modal Contrastive Learning

Abstract: Understanding and inferring dislocation microstructures from diffraction patterns remains an open challenge in materials characterization, as diffraction measurements provide only indirect information about the underlying dislocation structure. In this work, a cross-modal learning framework is developed to enable the prediction of 3D dislocation structures directly from diffraction data. Dislocation density fields generated from discrete dislocation dynamics simulations are paired with corresponding virtual X-ray diffraction patterns and embedded into a shared 2D latent space using contrastive learning. The alignment between structural and diffraction representations of dislocation structures is evaluated directly in the learned latent space using correlations between corresponding latent features. To estimate the role of dataset size for this approach, farthest point sampling is employed to construct representative and diverse training subsets of varying sizes. The results show strong cross-modal alignment and that model performance improves rapidly with increasing dataset size. Near-saturation is achieved with approximately 500 representative observations from a dataset of 10,000 observations, enabling accurate prediction of dislocation density fields from previously unseen diffraction data of the same distribution. Qualitative comparisons confirm that the predicted structures capture the dominant spatial features of the underlying dislocation microstructures. These findings demonstrate an efficient approach for learning structure-diffraction relationships and highlight the potential for inferring structural characteristics of dislocation networks directly from diffraction patterns, providing a pathway toward diffraction-based structural analysis and future extension to experimental data.

Fri 11 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
X-ray diffraction patterns show how X-rays bounce off materials, but they only give indirect clues about tiny defects called dislocations inside. The authors developed a computer method that links simulated 3D dislocation structures with their X-ray patterns, so it can learn to guess the 3D defects just from the X-ray data. Their method works well on simulated examples, needing about 500 samples to accurately predict new structures. This could help scientists analyze materials more easily by using their X-ray data to find detailed internal defects.
Open 2609.12713v1

Process schemas unify atomic layer deposition and etching data reporting

Mined from Scientific Literature: Process Schemas for Atomic Layer Deposition and Etching in Materials Science

Abstract: Atomic layer deposition (ALD) and atomic layer etching (ALE) are reported heterogeneously across experimental and simulation literature in materials science, hindering comparison and machine-actionable reuse. We present four domain-expert-reviewed JSON Schemas for ALD and ALE experimental and simulation processes. Curated with schema-miner and grounded in QUDT using schema-miner pro, the schemas structure materials, process conditions, configurations , and measured or predicted results. We compare their scope, structure, and semantic grounding, and demonstrate their use for schema-guided literature extraction and publication of structured records through ORKG templates.

Thu 10 SeptArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Atomic layer deposition and etching are important methods to build and shape very thin layers of materials, used in technology development. These processes are described in many ways across scientific papers, making comparisons and digital reuse difficult. The authors created standard templates in JSON format that organize information about these processes, including conditions and results. These templates help extract and share process data consistently, making it easier to find and use.
Open 2609.12139v1

Crystal orientation maps improved with symmetry aware super resolution

Symmetry-aware super-resolution of crystal orientation maps via invariant latent-space learning

Abstract: Crystal-orientation maps are physical fields defined only up to crystal symmetry; electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) resolves them experimentally, but acquisition-time constraints limit spatial resolution. Unlike conventional images, EBSD data lie on the quotient space $\mathrm{SO}(3)/G$, where $G$ is the crystal-symmetry group. Standard Euclidean interpolation can therefore mix symmetry-equivalent representations and blur grain boundaries. We introduce the Symmetry-Group-Aware Super-Resolution Attention Network (SG-SRAN), which incorporates crystal symmetry and boundary preservation by design. A frozen, locally isometric encoder maps equivalent orientations to a common latent representation in which Euclidean distance approximates misorientation. Super-resolution is performed in this space, with each high-resolution token restricted to a feature-consistent local support to prevent cross-boundary mixing. A dictionary-based decoder then recovers valid orientations. Across FCC and HCP benchmarks, SG-SRAN matches 15-16 million parameter backbones using only 27-49k trainable parameters, while achieving the lowest p68 errors, highest inverse-pole-figure fidelity, and zero-shot transfer to unseen alloys.

Wed 9 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionMachine Learning
The gist
Crystal orientation maps show how crystals are arranged inside materials, but measuring them precisely takes a long time and can give blurry results. The authors designed a new method called SG-SRAN that understands the natural symmetries in crystals and improves the clarity of these maps without mixing up different regions. Their approach uses a special math space that treats equivalent crystal orientations as the same, keeps sharp boundaries, and learns efficiently. It works well across different crystal types and can even handle materials the method was not trained on.
Open 2609.10898v1

New model speeds crystal structure prediction with fewer steps

uFlowCSP: Crystal Structure Prediction using Mean flow generative models

Abstract: Crystal structure prediction (CSP) is fundamental to computational materials discovery. Generative models including CDVAE, DiffCSP, FlowMM, and CrystalFlow learn stable-crystal distributions directly, but diffusion and flow-matching inference requires tens to thousands of sequential network evaluations per candidate. We introduce uFlowCSP, a MeanFlow-based CSP model that learns the average, rather than instantaneous, probability-flow velocity. It generates a complete structure in one to five evaluations, delivering 5x-58x faster inference with equal or better performance. A chemistry- and symmetry-aware Transformer uses canonical atom ordering, global composition, and per-token chemistry embeddings. A coarse crystal-system token is used only during training; it provides additive gains, particularly improving space-group agreement despite being absent at inference, which remains formula-only. On MP-20 with 20 candidates per target, one step matches CrystalFlow (78.38% vs. 78.34%) with 100x fewer evaluations and about 10x lower wall-clock time. Five steps reach 83.64%, exceeding CrystalFlow (78.34% at 2,000 evaluations) and DiffCSP (77.93% at about 20,000), while using 20x fewer evaluations. uFlowCSP generates 10,000 structures in 0.39-1.31 minutes, versus 6.5 for CrystalFlow and 76.1 for DiffCSP. Under CSPBench's energy-ranked top-five structure-and-space-group criterion, five-step uFlowCSP reaches 72%/72%/65% structure, space-group, and consensus match rates. CrystalFlow reaches 78%/73%/68% at 100 steps but falls to 49%/32%/31% at five. Thus, uFlowCSP improves accuracy per network evaluation, not merely peak accuracy.

Wed 9 SeptArtificial IntelligenceMachine Learning
The gist
Predicting crystal structures is important for discovering new materials but can be slow because traditional methods require many steps to find stable arrangements. The authors present uFlowCSP, a model that predicts crystal structures much faster with only a few steps, while keeping or improving accuracy. It uses a special transformer to understand chemistry and crystal symmetry, making it efficient even without extra information at prediction time. This can help researchers explore materials more quickly and efficiently.
Open 2609.09799v1

Plasticity model improves accuracy and training speed using parallel state dynamics

Constitutive State-Space Modeling of Path-Dependent Plasticity: A Resolution-Consistent and Parallelizable Computational Framework

Abstract: Data-driven constitutive models for path-dependent plasticity are commonly formulated using nonlinear recurrent neural networks, whose sequential state evolution limits parallel training and whose predictions may depend on the discretization of the applied strain path. We introduce a Constitutive State Space (CSS) model that reformulates structured state-space dynamics as an incremental constitutive operator. The strain increment is decomposed into magnitude and direction: the loading direction drives the latent state-space system, while the increment magnitude enters the zero-order-hold discretization of its continuous-time linear recurrence. This mechanics-tailored construction guarantees stationarity under zero increments, strongly reduces sensitivity to strain-path resolution, and retains the parallel-scan structure of S5 for efficient training on long constitutive histories. The CSS and Minimal State Cell (MSC) architectures are compared for four multiaxial path-dependent material models including isotropic J2 plasticity, pressure-sensitive foam plasticity, and combined isotropic-kinematic hardening. CSS matches or exceeds the prediction accuracy of the MSC, including one order of magnitude lower validation losses for the plastically incompressible materials. Importantly, CSS maintains low errors across large changes in strain-path discretization, whereas the MSC error increases substantially when evaluated at coarser resolutions than used for training. CSS trains substantially faster and requires fewer strain-stress pairs to attain comparable or better accuracy. Analysis of the learned state further reveals latent structure consistent with the dimensionality of the underlying physical constitutive models. These results establish mechanics-tailored structured state-space dynamics as a computational framework for efficient and discretization-robust data-driven constitutive modeling.

Mon 7 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Modeling how materials change their shape and behavior under stress can be complex and slow when done step-by-step. The authors introduce a new way to model this plastic behavior using a parallel approach that breaks down strain into direction and amount. This method trains faster, works well even with fewer example data points, and remains accurate even when tested with different detail levels in the applied stress. Overall, the new model can better predict material behavior across a range of conditions and is more efficient to use.
Open 2609.07294v1