geospatial data analysts

Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown strong potential for remote sensing understanding, yet reliable reasoning remains challenging when tasks require fine-grained visual grounding and multi-step inference. Existing approaches typically rely on either costly pre-constructed reasoning trajectories or self-generated signals such as response consistency, which can reinforce shared errors and provide unreliable supervision. We introduce \textbf{Reasoning--Diagnosis Self-Evolution (ReDiS)}, a framework that separates reasoning exploration from candidate evaluation while allowing the two processes to evolve jointly. ReDiS instantiates two role-specific experts from a shared multimodal backbone: a \textbf{Reasoner} that explores diverse visual evidence--answer candidates and a \textbf{Diagnoser} that jointly evaluates the complete candidate set and provides credibility-aware feedback. As the Reasoner evolves, it exposes new candidate distributions and failure modes; the Diagnoser adapts to these changes and, in turn, reshapes the learning signal for subsequent exploration. To handle groups in which all sampled answers are incorrect and group-relative advantages vanish, we further introduce \textbf{Failure-Triggered Recovery (FTR)}, which provides minimal outcome-level correction without prescribing intermediate reasoning trajectories. Experiments on LHRS-Bench, MME-RS, and CHOICE show consistent improvements over Qwen3.5 backbones at 0.8B, 2B, and 4B scales. ReDiS improves category-averaged accuracy by 6.47 percentage points at 0.8B, while ReDiS-4B achieves the highest average performance among the compared remote sensing MLLMs.

Abstract: Remote sensing scene classification is a fundamental task in Earth observation and geospatial analysis. Existing approaches mainly follow three paradigms: task-specific visual classification, vision-language similarity matching, and autoregressive multimodal generation. However, visual classifiers rely on predefined label spaces, CLIP-based methods perform recognition through static image-text alignment, and multimodal large language models (MLLMs) introduce unnecessary token-level generation for classification tasks with explicit candidate categories. To address these limitations, we propose RSJEV, a one-pass multimodal decision framework for remote sensing scene classification. Unlike conventional MLLMs that formulate classification as autoregressive text generation, RSJEV reformulates scene classification as a candidate-conditioned multimodal discriminative decision process, where visual representations, task instructions, and candidate category semantics are jointly modeled. Specifically, we introduce a OnePass Decider that extracts multimodal decision states and directly estimates category probabilities within the candidate category space, eliminating autoregressive decoding while preserving vision-language interactions. Extensive experiments on three widely used remote sensing scene classification benchmarks, including UC Merced, AID, and NWPU-RESISC45, demonstrate that RSJEV achieves superior classification performance compared with representative CNN-, Transformer-, Mamba-, CLIP-, and MLLM-based methods. Moreover, RSJEV significantly reduces inference costs and achieves a better accuracy-efficiency trade-off with only a compact 0.8B-parameter model. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of state-conditioned multimodal decision making for efficient remote sensing image understanding. The code will be available at https://github.com/Dongtcs/RSJEV.

Abstract: Earth-observation (EO) foundation models provide reusable embeddings, yet downstream task accuracy does not reveal whether these representations encode geographic information, which may be beneficial for location-aware applications but potentially detrimental when representations invariant to geographic location are desired. We therefore evaluate the geographic coordinate robustness of Tessera v1, Tessera v1.1, and AlphaEarth by testing whether coordinates can be predicted from the embedding representations using 284 quality-verified European solar farms from 2024. We assessed geographic information content information through the association between cosine and geodesic distances and through prediction of projected coordinates in EPSG:3035. Embeddings from all three EO foundation models contain recoverable geographic information. All prediction models significantly outperform training-range uniform random sampling baselines, with AlphaEarth exhibiting the strongest distance association and lowest mean geodesic error. Both Tessera variants also yielded higher geographic distance correlations than the Sentinel-2 controls. These findings motivate geographic information content as an additional criterion for auditing EO foundation models.

Abstract: Disaster-risk-reduction archives describe hazard events in prose that databases such as EM-DAT (Delforge et al., 2025) cannot ingest directly. We present an LLM pipeline that generates candidate georeferenced event records using a controlled hazard vocabulary and fixed schema, retaining evidence for review. Applied to 10,000 documents from PreventionWeb, the knowledge hub managed by UNDRR, it produced 3,572 records from 1,913 documents across 24 hazard types and resolved 81% of location mentions to OpenStreetMap geometries. On 171 human-positive document windows from a stratified 217-document reference set, GPT-5 achieved 86.0% pooled attribute $F_1$, versus 44.2% for the spaCy-gazetteer baseline. Evaluation pools hazard families, location strings, and event years within documents, without assessing their assignment to individual events. GPT-5.4 ranked highest among ten LLMs (86.6% $F_1$). Verbatim evidence occurrence was 72.0% for GPT-5 and 47.2% for GPT-5.4, measuring textual traceability without establishing attribute support. We report production failure modes and automated label and location-rule compliance checks. Prompts, schema, and outputs will be released for adaptation to national reporting archives.

Abstract: Geospatial agents are increasingly expected to support recurring and evolving analytical tasks rather than execute isolated workflows. In such settings, effective agents must distill prior execution experience into reusable geospatial procedural knowledge to guide future planning and tool use. However, existing memory-augmented paradigms struggle to summarize both long-horizon tool-chain orchestration experience and tool-level invocation constraints in geospatial analysis, while directly relying on LLM self-reflection to update experience often leads to misattribution and unreliable revisions. To address these challenges, we propose GeoSkill, an experience-driven hierarchical skill learning framework for geospatial agents. GeoSkill comprises two core components: (i) a Hierarchical Skill Bank (HSB), consisting of a Planning Skill Bank and a Tool Skill Bank, which respectively distill high-level task-planning experience and tool usage constraints, enabling structured representation and cross-task reuse of historical execution experience; and (ii) a Collaborative Trace-driven Skill Revision (CTSR) mechanism, where Judge, Critic, and Refiner collaboratively perform error identification, skill-level defect localization, and targeted modification, preventing misattributed and unreliable revisions from polluting the skill bank. GeoSkill learns and validates skills from historical executions during development, and freezes the skill bank for retrieval-only guidance on unseen tasks during deployment. Extensive experiments on EarthBench and ThinkGeo demonstrate that GeoSkill effectively transforms historical execution experience into reusable hierarchical skills, improving both end-to-end task accuracy and tool-execution reliability in geospatial tasks.