ReDiS: Reasoning-Diagnosis Self-Evolution for Multimodal Reasoning in Remote Sensing
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Summary
The gist is being written…
Authors
Yi Liu, Wentao Jiang, Shuo Ni, Zhiming Luo, Di Wang, Zengmao Wang, Jing Zhang, Bo Du
Abstract
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown strong potential for remote sensing understanding, yet reliable reasoning remains challenging when tasks require fine-grained visual grounding and multi-step inference. Existing approaches typically rely on either costly pre-constructed reasoning trajectories or self-generated signals such as response consistency, which can reinforce shared errors and provide unreliable supervision. We introduce \textbf{Reasoning--Diagnosis Self-Evolution (ReDiS)}, a framework that separates reasoning exploration from candidate evaluation while allowing the two processes to evolve jointly. ReDiS instantiates two role-specific experts from a shared multimodal backbone: a \textbf{Reasoner} that explores diverse visual evidence--answer candidates and a \textbf{Diagnoser} that jointly evaluates the complete candidate set and provides credibility-aware feedback. As the Reasoner evolves, it exposes new candidate distributions and failure modes; the Diagnoser adapts to these changes and, in turn, reshapes the learning signal for subsequent exploration. To handle groups in which all sampled answers are incorrect and group-relative advantages vanish, we further introduce \textbf{Failure-Triggered Recovery (FTR)}, which provides minimal outcome-level correction without prescribing intermediate reasoning trajectories. Experiments on LHRS-Bench, MME-RS, and CHOICE show consistent improvements over Qwen3.5 backbones at 0.8B, 2B, and 4B scales. ReDiS improves category-averaged accuracy by 6.47 percentage points at 0.8B, while ReDiS-4B achieves the highest average performance among the compared remote sensing MLLMs.