Papers for
data center engineers
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Software platform emulates AI and HPC datacenter racks for development
Cnuas: A Software-Defined AI/HPC Rack-scale Emulation Platform and Hyperscale Data Center Facility Twin
Abstract: Modern AI and HPC systems integrate accelerators, high-speed networks, and management controllers at rack scale. Developing software for this infrastructure typically requires access to scarce, costly hardware, while software abstractions can obscure how workloads depend on resources across servers and accelerators. This paper presents Cnuas, an open-source, experimental rack-scale emulation platform whose baseline architecture follows the Open Compute Project (OCP) Open Rack v3 specifications. Through functional emulation, it supports experimentation, learning and software development within academic and industrial research and development, rather than matching the throughput or latency of physical hardware. Its web-based user interface visualizes racks, devices and their interconnections to help developers build a system-level mental model of the infrastructure supporting their workloads. At its core, CnuasNIC and CnuasSwitch implement a guest-visible remote direct memory access (RDMA) adapter and a host-resident hybrid software switch supporting both RoCEv2 and native InfiniBand. The platform also provides a dedicated AI/ML accelerator (GPU) peer fabric and OpenBMC-based rack management with executable power supply and battery backup firmware over RS-485. These components support the study of device, driver, and firmware interfaces on commodity hosts. The accelerator software stack remains an early research prototype, and facility modeling with OpenUSD is an exploratory extension. The paper presents the architecture, interfaces, and bounded prototype results as a basis for community collaboration across the core platform and its extensions.
AI data centers require flexible power and grid stability design
From Grid to Chip: Power Architecture, Stability, and Flexibility of AI Data Centers
Abstract: The rapid growth of artificial intelligence (AI) computing is transforming data centers into large, dynamic electrical loads. Their deployment is primarily constrained by energy availability and grid-connection capacity, which is further aggravated by the ability of power-delivery architectures, control systems, and computing workloads to operate reliably during fast grid disturbances. This article presents a technological perspective on AI data centers as grid-interactive computing systems. First, it reviews grid-integration bottlenecks, evolving connection policies, grid-code requirements, which has fostered new technological trends via spatio-temporal flexibility available through workload orchestration, cooling systems, on-site resources, and energy storage. Second, it maps the evolution of power-delivery architectures from medium-voltage grid interfaces to chip-level, discussing higher-voltage DC distribution, solid-state transformers, wide-bandgap devices, advanced chip-level power delivery, and liquid cooling. Third, it establishes a three-level stability framework spanning rack-level DC-bus dynamics, facility-level converter interactions, and system-level grid-coupled behavior. The framework connects dominant instability mechanisms, including constant power load effects, impedance interactions, forced oscillations, and operating-mode transitions, with suitable modeling, assessment, and mitigation approaches. Synthesizing these topics, this article highlights grid-to-chip co-design as a central requirement for scalable AI infrastructure, linking computing workloads, power-delivery systems, energy buffers, and grid operation.
Probabilistic models run over 1000 times faster on new memory hardware
Bio-inspired Learning and Decision-Making with Probabilistic In-Memory Computing Hardware: Part 2
Abstract: This report extends our previous work (Part 1), which introduced an energy-based model for learning and decision-making under uncertainty. The model leverages stochastic Langevin dynamics to continuously evolve approximate probability distributions over neuron states and model weights. However, as noted in Part 1 and confirmed through GPU-based implementations, large-scale probabilistic energy-based models of this nature face significant scalability challenges due to excessive execution latency. This latency stems from a fundamental mismatch: massively parallel models with low arithmetic intensity (such as energy-based models) are being executed on processor architectures like GPUs that rely on high-bandwidth memory (HBM) interfaces. The HBM imposes brutally sequential execution constraints on inherently parallelizable models, creating the false impression that such models are unscalable. In reality, it is the GPU architecture itself, with its dependence on HBM interfaces, that is not a scalable processor architecture for this class of AI model. In this report, we demonstrate using a detailed transaction-level model (TLM) of a probabilistic analogue in-memory computing (AIMC) processor that the same energy-based model can execute well over 1000x faster than data-center-grade hardware by eliminating the HBM interface and performing computation directly within on-chip memory.
Distributed gpu solver handles massive linear programs faster than cpu
Distributed Linear Programming on GPU Clusters at Extreme Scale
Abstract: Large linear programs can exceed the memory of a single compute node. Although first-order methods replace sparse factorizations with GPU-suited matrix-vector products, other solver phases can reintroduce a single-node memory limit. We present SHARDLP, a distributed GPU LP solver that keeps the matrix and primal-dual state partitioned from sharded input through solution output. On the Google PDLP benchmark, SHARDLP reaches the published criterion on nine of eleven instances, compared with eight in the published CPU PDLP study. On the largest benchmark, eight H200 GPUs solve a 1.185-billion-variable, 6.338-billion-nonzero LP in 9.9 minutes; the published CPU experiment reports 21.06 hours on different hardware. Beyond this benchmark, separately checked multi-node solves reach up to 13.604 billion variables and 40.807 billion nonzeros, while validated executions span up to 76 GPUs across 29 compute nodes. For column-partitioned solves, support-aware communication skips GPUs that store no coefficients for a row; on an LP with 2.76 billion nonzeros, it cuts modelled communication by 92.97% and improves solver time by 1.27x-1.52x