Papers for

content moderation developers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

MMFact simplifies comparing multimodal misinformation detectors

MMFact: Simplifying Multimodal Misinformation Detection with Shared Resources and Tools

Abstract: Multimodal misinformation detection methods often rely on different preprocessing pipelines and auxiliary resources, making experimental comparisons difficult to interpret. We present MMFact, a collection of shared resources and tools that simplifies this research workflow. It brings together 47 detector implementations and baselines, three multimodal datasets, and prepared materials ranging from semantic features to OCR, image descriptions, and external evidence. Compatible methods can use the same materials, reducing variation introduced by preprocessing and supporting fairer comparisons. A modular training and evaluation framework preserves method-specific designs while providing common experimental procedures. By treating prepared materials as a shared research resource, MMFact helps researchers focus on developing and evaluating detection methods.

Sun 25 OctMultimedia
The gist
Detecting false information that combines text and images is tricky because researchers use many different tools and data preparations, making comparisons hard. The authors created MMFact, a shared set of tools and resources that collects many detector methods, datasets, and prepared materials like text features and image descriptions. This lets different detection methods use the same starting materials, making comparisons fairer and easier. MMFact also provides a modular system for training and testing detectors while keeping their unique designs intact. This helps researchers focus on building better ways to spot misinformation.
Open → 2610.34162v1

Layer patterns reveal how harmful AI prompts develop over processing

Harmfulness Propagation Dynamics: Layer-wise Trajectories of Adversarial Intent in Large Language Models

Abstract: We identify \textbf{Harmfulness Propagation Dynamics (HPD)}: for harmful prompts, the projection of the last-token hidden state onto a learned harm direction rises monotonically with transformer depth, whereas benign prompts remain flat or oscillatory. This cross-layer signature reflects harmful intent as a \emph{progressively resolved} semantic property: surface form appears early, while pragmatic intent consolidates later, making the \emph{trajectory shape} more informative than any single-layer snapshot. Moreover, LDA-based harm directions, learned per layer, remain stable across random splits (pairwise cosine similarity $>0.97$), supporting the projection sequence as a reproducible structured signal. Building on HPD, we introduce \textbf{\herald{}} (\textbf{H}armful \textbf{E}ncoding \textbf{R}ecognition via \textbf{A}ctivation \textbf{L}ayer \textbf{D}ynamics). This lightweight input moderator extracts a seven-dimensional feature record, slope, curvature, monotonicity, onset layer, and related statistics from the cross-layer projection sequence and classifies it with a 288-parameter MLP. \herald{} stores one $d$-dimensional direction per layer ($262$\,KB for a 32-layer, $d{=}4096$ model), requires no gradient computation during training, and adds only $2.6{\times}10^{-6}$ prefill FLOPs at inference. Across eight prompt-harmfulness benchmarks and four model families, \herald{} achieves an average F1 of $89.3$ on OLMo2-7B, surpassing all tested guard models on adversarial jailbreak detection ($98.4$ vs.\ $96.9$ F1) and outperforming prior latent-based methods by $2.3$-$4.1$ F1 points on every backbone. Per-instance trajectories provide machine-readable audit records that reveal \emph{when} and \emph{how} harmfulness emerges, offering an interpretability advantage over single-layer approaches.

Fri 11 SeptComputation and Language
The gist
Some prompts given to large AI language models are harmful or dangerous. The authors find that the way harmful intent builds up in the AI’s processing layers follows a clear pattern, rising steadily in strength as the model thinks deeper. They create a lightweight tool called HERALD that watches how harmful signals grow through the layers to detect harmful prompts better than older methods. HERALD can say when harmful ideas appear and how they form inside the AI, helping to understand and catch bad inputs more reliably.
Open → 2609.13534v1