Papers for
chip design teams
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
PlaceReasoner Beta improves macro placement in chip design using reasoning
PlaceReasoner-Beta: Reasoning-Driven Macro Placement and Benchmarking
Abstract: Automated macro placement remains a fundamental challenge in VLSI physical design. Despite decades of research, existing approaches predominantly optimize hand-crafted proxy objectives, such as estimated wirelength, and typically produce placements through one-shot numerical optimization, limiting their ability to incorporate visual layout context, codified design expertise, and downstream physical-design feedback in a unified loop. We present PlaceReasoner-Beta, a verifier-guided multi-agent framework that reformulates macro placement as a closed-loop reasoning problem rather than black-box optimization. A vision-language model (VLM) planner generates candidate placements from the floorplan image, macro specifications, and connectivity structure; a geometric verifier enforces physical legality and expert placement principles; a physical verifier refines candidates using early implementation feedback; and a post-route optimizer further improves promising layouts using final PPA. To enable reproducible evaluation, we introduce PlaceReasoner-Bench, a fully open end-to-end benchmark built from open RTL designs, EDA tools, and technology libraries. It comprises 8 designs at two aspect ratios, yielding 16 tasks with fixed floorplans and I/O assignments, so methods differ only in macro positions and orientations and are evaluated using routed PPA and DRC rather than pre-route proxies. Across the benchmark, PlaceReasoner-Beta achieves the best timing among DRC-clean methods on all square tasks, reducing post-route TNS by 61.2% at 1:1 and 53.0% at 2:1 relative to the classical baseline field. It also shortens routed wirelength on most designs despite never explicitly optimizing it, demonstrating that reasoning over spatial structure under physical-design feedback can improve end-to-end layout quality beyond proxy-objective optimization.
AutoTrans automates secure RISC-V assertion translation with AI help
AutoTrans: AI-Assisted Automatic Translation of Security Assertions for RISC-V Processors
Abstract: Reusing a set of verified security assertions across RISC-V processor targets remains one of the most expensive bottlenecks in hardware security verification. Manual translation takes hours per assertion. Raw LLM translation is fast but unreliable, introducing signal hallucination, where the model invents port names absent from the target RTL and produces outputs that may vary across model updates or even within the same model version. This paper presents AutoTrans, an automated framework that addresses the above shortcomings. First, a new lightweight Regular Expression-based System Verilog signal extractor is proposed to identify the signals for generating security assertions. This step is necessary to prevent signal hallucination. Second, a template is introduced to create prompt and pinned inference parameters that guarantee a byte-identical prompt assembly on every run, making the pipeline output resilient to model updates. Moreover, the introduced template for LLM prompting is capable of generating security assertions from English-only security descriptions of RISC-V processors, with no manual authoring. Third, a formal verification process (JasperGold FPV) is integrated, which guarantees that the generated security assertions verify the security of the RISC-V processor rather than silently entering the result set. The workflow is applied on Deepseek V4 to translate security assertions from one RISC-V to another (e.g., for IBEX from NS31A RISC-V). The experiment shows that AutoTrans achieves 78\% Auto Translation Acceptance Rate (TAR) automatically and without human intervention and 100\% Final TAR after refinement by humans.