Papers for

automata theorists

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Classification of prime deterministic automata over finite alphabets

Prime Accessible Deterministic Automata

Abstract: We classify prime accessible deterministic automata over finite alphabets, both among finite automata and among automata with arbitrary state sets. Every one-state automaton is prime. Over a one-letter alphabet, a finite nontrivial automaton is prime exactly when it is a cycle of prime-power length or a finite chain ending in a fixed state. The unique infinite accessible unary automaton, up to isomorphism, is also prime. Every nontrivial automaton over an alphabet with at least two letters is not prime. Shen proved the finite case; we give a shorter proof. We also characterize a decomposition of the automaton whose states are all finite input words. The reachable product of the quotients by the least right congruences identifying the empty word with nonempty words $p$ and $q$, respectively, is isomorphic to this automaton exactly when $p^r\ne q^s$ for all positive integers $r,s$.

Fri 9 OctFormal Languages and Automata Theory
The gist
This paper identifies which simple types of deterministic state machines, called automata, are 'prime'—meaning they cannot be broken down further. The authors show that all single-state machines are prime and that over a single-letter alphabet, prime automata correspond to cycles with lengths based on prime powers or simple chains. They confirm that more complicated machines with two or more letters are not prime. They also analyze the structure of infinite automata built from all finite input words and offer a precise condition when certain combinations of these automata are isomorphic.
Open → 2610.13274v1

Certifying short extending words improves analysis of finite automata subsets

Certificates for short extending words in a finite automaton

Abstract: Let $\mathcal A$ be a complete deterministic finite automaton on a state set $Q$ of size $n$ with $k$ letters, and for a proper nonempty subset $S$ of $Q$ let $\mathrm{minext}(S)$ be the length of a shortest word $u$ with $|Su^{-1}|>|S|$, where $Su^{-1}=\{q: q\cdot u\in S\}$. To each state $q$ attach the integer $β^{\ast}_q=\sum_{t=1}^{n-1}k^{\,n-1-t}(\mathrm{indeg}_t(q)-k^{t})$, where $\mathrm{indeg}_t(q)$ counts the pairs $(p,u)$ with $|u|=t$ and $p\cdot u=q$, and let $B(S)=\sum_{q\in S}β^{\ast}_q$. On every synchronizing automaton, $B(S)\ge0$ implies $\mathrm{minext}(S)\le n-1$, so, as $B(Q)=0$, one of $S$ and $Q\setminus S$ extends within $n-1$; when $B(S)>0$ no hypothesis is needed. Kari's Eulerian extension lemma is the case $β^{\ast}=0$, and $β^{\ast}$, like every member of the family $\sum_{t=1}^{n-1}c_tσ_t$, $c_t>0$, vanishes identically if and only if the automaton is Eulerian, where $σ_t(S)=\sum_{q\in S}(\mathrm{indeg}_t(q)-k^{t})$. On strongly connected automata $σ_t(S)/k^{t}$ has Cesàro limit $n\,e(S)/e(Q)-|S|$ for Friedman's weight $e$; that limit certifies singletons but no larger subset in general. The hypothesis $B(S)\ge0$ cannot be relaxed by one integer unit, nor can the constant $n-1$ be improved. A second-moment test on the sizes $|Su^{-1}|$ certifies 60 to 95 percent of the subsets with $B(S)<0$ at $n\le7$. Along non-Eulerian automata whose words of length $n-1$ merge a fraction of the state pairs bounded below, with $\max_q\mathrm{indeg}_{n-1}(q)=o(nk^{n-1})$, it certifies all but a vanishing share of them. The functional $B$ certifies half of the subsets outside $\{B=0\}$. At each subset size coprime to $n$ ($n\ge4$) some synchronizing Eulerian binary automaton attains the constant $n-1$; whether only there is open. No reset bound follows: Černý's automata have subsets not extending within $n-1$.

Fri 18 SeptFormal Languages and Automata TheoryDiscrete Mathematics
The gist
This paper studies how to recognize certain short words in finite automata that 'extend' subsets of states, making these subsets larger when traced backward. The authors introduce a mathematical tool called the functional B to certify when short extending words exist, and they prove limits on how this certificate behaves. They also explore statistical tests to cover more cases, providing ways to better understand the structure and synchronization properties of automata.
Open → 2609.21603v1