AIPOCH Open-Science: An Open-Source AI Research Workbench with Reproducible .science Packages
Software EngineeringArtificial Intelligence
Summary
The gist is being written…
Authors
Wen Ouyang, Bocheng Huang, Qianyu Yao, Fei Sun, Minying Deng, Haoyue Cheng, Wenwen Zhou, Lei Mou, Yusi Wei, Jiang Li, Kun Zhu, Lei Wang, Yi Feng, Jiaheng Dai, Ke Qian, Dan Wang, Yahui Wang, Chenyi Wang, Mingsheng Lyu, Yaqiang Zhang, Ping Zheng, Chunhua Tang, Xinge Ma, Xu Zhang, Youjia Fan, Can Lu, Zhijun Dai, Man Hu, Qiqi Xie, Beinan Liu, Yuanning Guo, Yunze Liu, Jinhong Jiang, Xianjun Fu, Mingwei Zhang, Yuanji Xu, Shilin Xia, Bowen Yang, Mingjun Yu, Jingdun Xie, Xuwei Chen, Xia Zou, Yuzhou Xue, Jianguo Zhou, Chunhao Cao, Donghao Tian, Lei Huang, Jinxiao Li, Shengrong Long, Zefeng Song, Honglin Li, Jiang Luo, Wenying Jiang, Shanshan Li, Lei Dai, Ning Jiang, Ying Cai, Chaohui Li, Chunyan Peng, Hetong Zhao, Angqing Li, Chunyan Yang, Chongyang Sun, Yong Li, Xinyu Shi, Wei Dai, Ming Peng, Chen Sang, Yuanyuan Han, Desong Qiu, Haixin Miao, Jian Xu, Yi Chen, Xiaoliang Shi, Tian Shen, Teng Hu, Shuhao Wang, Yingyong Hou, Huimei Wang
Abstract
AI-assisted research leaves instructions, computations, artifact revisions and checks whose relationships matter when another researcher receives the work. We present AIPOCH Open-Science, an open-source research workbench with portable .science session packages, and specify an exchange contract for these recorded relationships. Version and assessment targets remain attributable while receiving-workspace identifiers can be remapped, eligible contents can be omitted explicitly, and imported history remains separate from a writable fork. A controlled session tested an incorrect first version, a reviewed correction, an unreviewed revision and a planned but unexecuted step. We compared complete and partial exports with source records extracted independently of the exporter, then inspected imports into separate projects within the same installation. Both conditions retained the tested version and review associations, kept the unreviewed revision distinct from earlier assessments and represented excluded content as unavailable. A documentation-rich ordinary directory also supplied evidence for all seven static inspection questions. A separate registry case connected a table to its recorded task, execution and review; offline execution of its retained script and fixed input reproduced two saved CSV tables byte for byte. The study contributes an implemented exchange contract and a controlled examination of its preservation rules, content-selection constraints and interpretation boundaries.