A Taxonomy on Collective Awareness

As robotic teams tackle increasingly complex tasks in dynamic and unstructured environments, effective coordination requires agents to maintain accurate, aligned representations of their environment, teammates, and mission state. We argue that Mutual Awareness, Shared Situational Awareness, and Team Situational Awareness --- three concepts widely invoked in the multi-robot systems literature --- are not interchangeable: they form a containment hierarchy in which each type subsumes the previous in scope, and span a distribution spectrum from fully individualized understanding (MA) to fully uniform understanding (SSA), with TSA occupying a mixed position. We establish this through a two-dimensional taxonomy organized along the object of awareness and awareness distribution axes. Treating these terms as synonyms obscures the precise coordination requirements each imposes on a robotic system. A Search and Rescue case study with heterogeneous aerial and ground robots grounds each taxonomy position in concrete coordination requirements. These findings provide a conceptual foundation for principled specification, design, and comparison of collective awareness in multi-robot systems.