Bounds on binary quadratic systems with unique or no solutions revealed
A Note on Binary Quadratic Systems and their relation to complexity theory
Information TheoryComputational ComplexityCryptography and Security
Summary
Deciding if a set of binary quadratic equations has a solution is an important and difficult problem in computer science with uses in secure cryptography. The authors study how many such systems have exactly one solution compared to none and find precise mathematical bounds showing that there are always slightly more with one solution than none. They use ideas from geometry and coding theory to connect these systems to mathematical objects called matroids and error-correcting codes, which helps explain why this difference occurs. This work deepens understanding of the complexity behind solving these equations.
NP-completebinary quadratic equationsmatroid theoryevaluation matroidReed-Muller codecoding theorypost-quantum cryptographycoNP-completeminimum distanceMacWilliams identity
Authors
Gabriele Radici, Massimiliano Sala
Abstract
Deciding whether a system of multivariate quadratic equations over $\mathbb F_2$ has a solution is a classical NP-complete problem, and remains so for square systems, with as many equations as variables. The hardness of this problem is one of the cornerstones of nowadays post-quantum cryptography. Let $\MQ_0(n)$ and $\MQ_1(n)$ denote the sets of square quadratic systems in $n$ variables having respectively no solutions and exactly one solution. $\cup_{n\geq 2} \MQ_0(n)$ is a coNP-complete language, while $\cup_{n\geq 2} \MQ_1(n)$ lies in DP. It is known that $\lim_{n\to \infty} |\MQ_1(n)|/|\MQ_0(n)|=1$. Here we prove the explicit finite-$n$ bounds \[ |\MQ_0(n)|<|\MQ_1(n)| \le \left(1+\frac{1}{2^n-1}\right)|\MQ_0(n)|, \] More generally, let $Q_d$ be the space of polynomial functions $(\FF_2)^n\to\mathbb F_2$ of degree at most $d$, and let $α_k$ count square systems in $(Q_d)^n$ having exactly $k$ solutions. Then \[ α_0<α_1 \le \left(1+\frac{1}{2^n-1}\right)α_0\,, \qquad 2\le d\le n \,. \] The proof combines matroid and coding-theoretic methods. We interpret $(\FF_2)^n$ as the ground set of the evaluation matroid of $Q_d$, express $α_0$ and $α_1$ through characteristic polynomials, and use a Whitney-type sign-reversing involution to show that the only terms that can push $α_1-α_0$ below $α_1/2^n$ come from the elements of a matroid port. These are identified with minimal-support words of the Reed--Muller code $\RM(n-d-1,n)=\RM(d,n)^\perp$; the required estimate then follows from the MacWilliams identity, the minimum-distance bound $2^{d+1}$, and the even-weight structure of the code.