EEG signals help detect passenger danger awareness in self driving cars
EEG-Driven Decoding Framework for Passenger Hazard Perception in Highly Automated Vehicles
Artificial IntelligenceMachine Learning
Summary
Figuring out when a self-driving car passenger notices danger can help improve safety. The authors designed a system that reads brain signals (EEG) from passengers to understand if they sense risk or specific hazards. They used advanced neural networks to analyze these signals and found their method works well even across different people and sessions. This approach could give future autonomous vehicles extra information to make smarter safety decisions without needing the passenger to actively help.
Electroencephalogram (EEG)Brain-computer interface (BCI)Autonomous vehicles (AVs)Risk predictionDanger identification3D convolutional recurrent neural network (3D-CRNN)Balanced accuracyCross-subject generalizationPassenger cognitionSafety of the Intended Functionality (SOTIF)
Authors
Yingkai Yang, Ashton Yu Xuan Tan, Bowen Li, Xiaorong Gao, Sifa Zheng, Jianqiang Wang, Xinyu Gu, Yang Zhao, Yuxin Zhang, Sharon X. Huang, Tania Stathaki, Jun Li, Hong Wang
Abstract
Reliable risk assessment remains a central challenge for Autonomous Vehicles (AVs). Despite advances in automation, passenger cognition provides a non-intrusive auxiliary signal that improves both objective and perceived safety without requiring active human intervention. We introduce an Electroencephalogram (EEG)-based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) that decodes passenger neural responses for both Risk Prediction (RP) and Danger Identification (DI), explicitly modeling humans as passengers to match real-world AV use. To achieve this, we propose the Passenger Cognitive Model (PCM), Risk-aware Sequential Labeling (RSL), and the Passenger EEG Decoding Strategy (PEDS), which integrates a 3D Convolutional Recurrent Neural Network (3D-CRNN) model for joint EEG decoding. Experimental results show that 3D-CRNN achieves a Balanced Accuracy (BA) of $95.3\% \pm 2.7\%$ in RP and improves single-subject DI from $80.9\% \pm 3.9\%$ to $85.0\% \pm 3.2\%$ with RSL. Event-wise analyses further show that 3D-CRNN consistently outperforms other models across different event types in RP and DI. In generalization experiments, 3D-CRNN achieves $77.0\% \pm 5.3\%$ BA in cross-session DI and $77.4\% \pm 1.1\%$ BA on seen subjects in cross-subject evaluation, while maintaining a $64.9\% \pm 8.5\%$ BA on unseen subjects, demonstrating promising generalizability and transferability across both intra-subject and inter-subject variability. These findings establish an Electroencephalogram (EEG) decoding framework for AV passenger hazard perception and suggest that passenger cognitive signals can provide auxiliary supervision for future AV decision-making and Safety of the Intended Functionality (SOTIF) support.