Enhancing Personalized Bladder Cancer Treatment Through Reinforcement Learning: A Recurrent Patient State Transition Decision Support Framework

Machine Learning

Summary

The authors developed a computer system to help doctors decide how to treat bladder cancer, especially when the cancer comes back multiple times. Their system predicts how the cancer might change after each treatment and uses a method called reinforcement learning to find the best sequence of treatments over time. This approach adjusts recommendations based on how the patient's condition evolves and provides clear treatment plans and logs for doctors to understand. They tested their system and found it improved treatment planning compared to other similar methods.

Authors

Divyansh Chawla, Anshu Garg, Isshaan Singh

Abstract

Bladder cancer treatment requires personalized and adaptive decision-making, particularly for recurrent disease, where treatment effectiveness changes across successive clinical episodes. Conventional clinical decision support systems typically rely on static treatment guidelines or single-step predictive models, limiting their ability to capture disease progression over time. This paper presents a recurrent patient state-transition simulation framework for bladder cancer treatment planning that integrates predictive state-transition modeling with a Markov Decision Process (MDP) and a Deep Q-Network (DQN) reinforcement learning environment. The predictive module estimates changes in tumor characteristics following treatment, while the reinforcement learning agent sequentially optimizes treatment decisions by interacting with simulated patient trajectories. This framework enables dynamic, patient-specific treatment planning by continuously adapting recommendations to evolving clinical states. It also generates interpretable treatment trajectories and detailed simulation logs to improve transparency and support clinical decision-making. The proposed framework was evaluated against existing reinforcement learning-based treatment planning approaches. It achieved a cumulative reward of 63,918.87, an average training loss per episode of 0.0056, and a policy improvement score of 6.62%, demonstrating effective sequential learning and robust treatment optimization in a simulated recurrent treatment environment. These findings highlight the potential of recurrent patient state-transition simulation with reinforcement learning as a flexible decision-support framework for personalized bladder cancer treatment planning and AI-assisted precision oncology.