Information-Directed Sampling for Causal Bandits

Machine LearningArtificial Intelligence

Summary

The authors study a type of decision-making problem called contextual causal bandits where some important factors can't be changed directly but still affect outcomes. They assume the relationships between variables are known and use a Bayesian method to share information between different actions, improving learning efficiency. They create algorithms based on Thompson Sampling and Information-Directed Sampling adapted for this problem, and prove how well these perform using theoretical regret bounds. Their tests on simulated tasks show these new methods work better than previous approaches by using information more effectively across different choices.

Authors

Muhammad Qasim Elahi, Murat Kocaoglu, Mahsa Ghasemi

Abstract

Causal bandits exploit structural relationships among variables to share information across interventions and accelerate the identification of high-reward decisions. In many applications, however, some variables cannot be directly manipulated, even though they influence the reward and provide useful information about the underlying causal system. We study contextual causal bandits with non-manipulable variables, where context variables are observed before action selection and additional variables are observed after each intervention. Assuming a known causal graph without latent confounding, we adopt a Bayesian formulation in which the conditional probability tables of the observational distribution constitute the unknown parameter. This representation allows observations collected under one intervention to update reward estimates for other interventions through their shared causal mechanisms. We develop causal variants of Thompson Sampling and Information-Directed Sampling (IDS) for this setting. For Thompson Sampling, we establish an entropy-dependent sublinear Bayesian regret bound. For IDS, we derive an entropy-dependent regret bound that explicitly quantifies the additional error introduced by Monte Carlo approximation of the expected regret and information gain; when these quantities are available exactly, the bound recovers the standard sublinear IDS rate. We further provide high-probability confidence bounds for the Monte Carlo estimates used by the algorithm. Experiments on several synthetic causal bandit tasks show that the proposed methods outperform causal and non-causal baselines by more effectively exploiting information shared across interventions.