Dynamic Agent Skills: A Lifecycle Survey and Taxonomy of Evolving Skill Libraries

2026-07-11Artificial Intelligence

Artificial Intelligence
AI summary

The authors look at how "skills"—which are reusable procedures like code, instructions, or workflows—are stored and updated outside large language models. They analyze 124 papers from 2023 to 2026 to understand how these skill libraries change over time, proposing a detailed framework that covers how skills are created, verified, organized, and maintained. They identify key challenges like maintaining skill quality and effective retrieval as these libraries grow. Their work suggests better ways to report and evaluate these dynamic skill collections compared to treating them as static assets.

large language modelsskillsskill librariesdynamic systemsverificationretrievalskill lifecycleskill maintenancereinforcement learningartifact management
Authors
Yubo Li
Abstract
Large language model agents increasingly store reusable procedures outside the model. These reusable procedures are often called \emph{skills}: they may be code functions, natural-language instructions, SKILL.md packages, workflow graphs, or learned adapters that a future agent can retrieve and invoke. This taxonomy-driven survey asks how such skill libraries change over time. Across a $124$-paper $2023$--$2026$ audit set, we synthesize dynamic skill systems as \emph{lifecycle-managed, verified, evolving artifact stores}: agents collect evidence from interaction, propose skill updates, verify and admit candidates, organize them for retrieval and composition, repair or prune stale entries, and govern sharing through provenance and rollback. We organize the literature around three survey tools. First, a $\text{six}$-sense taxonomy distinguishes the structurally different artifacts called ``skills'' in current papers. Second, an $\text{eight}$-stage lifecycle architecture identifies the recurring design decisions behind evidence acquisition, proposal, verification/admission, storage, retrieval/composition, maintenance, distillation/portability, and governance. Third, a lightweight skill-record schema and $\text{ten}$-operator vocabulary provide common terms for comparing library updates without elevating them into a separate method contribution. Using this structure, we synthesize evidence-graded patterns with explicit caveats: admission and repair are repeatedly important, verifier quality materially affects skill-aware RL, flat retrieval can degrade as libraries grow, and current benchmarks still under-report library trajectories, usage--utility gaps, and safety surfaces. We close with concrete reporting standards and open problems for evaluating dynamic skills as changing libraries rather than static prompt or tool collections.