Traceable Virtual Sea Trials in the Marine Robotics Unity Simulator for Manoeuvring Assessment of Unmanned Surface Vehicles
2026-06-10 • Robotics
Robotics
AI summaryⓘ
The authors improved a marine simulator by adding an automated way to run and analyze important boat maneuvers called Turning Circle and Zig-Zag tests. Their system carefully tracks commands and actions to produce consistent and reliable data that matches international standards. Results show their simulator can mimic real boat behavior accurately, making it useful for studying how unmanned surface vehicles move and helping build digital models of them. This work helps reduce the need for costly and risky physical sea tests.
Unmanned Surface VehiclesHydrodynamic DerivativesTurning Circle TestZig-Zag TestSystem IdentificationMarine SimulatorIMO StandardsITTC ProceduresDigital TwinDifferential Thrust Steering
Authors
Paria Rezayan
Abstract
Accurate identification of hydrodynamic derivatives is essential for control and navigation of Unmanned Surface Vehicles (USVs), but high-fidelity manoeuvring data from physical sea trials are constrained by cost and safety. Turning Circle (TC) and Zig-Zag (ZZ) trials remain fundamental to IMO and ITTC assessment procedures. This paper extends the Marine Robotics Unity Simulator (MARUS) by introducing a standardised Virtual Sea Trial framework for automated execution and data generation of TC/ZZ manoeuvres, with traceable command-actuation logging, system-identification (SI)-focused data conditioning, and automated extraction of IMO/ITTC-aligned manoeuvring metrics. A key contribution is a dedicated TC/ZZ data acquisition and post-processing pipeline, improving the repeatability and auditability of simulator-based manoeuvres while producing SI-ready datasets for hydrodynamic-derivative identification and digital-twin workflows. Another feature is explicit command-execution separation for differential-thrust steering, where inputs are recorded as ordered rudder-equivalent commands and realised actuation is logged as an execution-level proxy derived from applied thrust. Case-study results demonstrate repeatable and compliant manoeuvre behaviour. For TC tests, the normalised advance differs by approximately 3.9 percent between port and starboard sides, while the tactical diameter differs by approximately 4.6 to 4.7 percent. For ZZ tests, first and second overshoot excesses remain below 1 degree for both +/- 10 degree and +/- 20 degree manoeuvres, satisfying IMO criteria, while peak yaw rates range from approximately 4.1 to 5.8 deg/s. Overall, the framework provides a repeatable and auditable virtual sea-trial workflow for generating IMO/ITTC-aligned datasets and supporting system identification, hydrodynamic-derivative estimation, and digital-twin calibration.