Papers for
wireless communication system designers
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Reed-Solomon and network coding compared for satellite error correction
RLNC vs Reed-Solomon in Satellite Channels: Crossover Analysis and the Bridging Property
Abstract: Satellite communication systems are increasingly relied upon for connectivity in remote areas and are expected to play a pivotal role in 6G networks, operating under high round-trip times and packet loss where forward error correction is essential. This work evaluates Reed-Solomon (RS) coding, Random Linear Network Coding (RLNC), and a combined RS+RLNC hybrid over a three-hop satellite channel whose loss statistics are derived from orbital geometry and link-budget calculations rather than assumed, comparing RS and RLNC at matched code rates of 0.800. The central finding is the \emph{bridging property} of RLNC: every RS code rate collapses above a crossover threshold $p^*$, while RLNC operates continuously through all failure regions with overhead growing as $1/(1-p)$. At rate~0.800, $p^* \approx 0.21$. Under the derived satcom channel with mean burst duration 166~minutes, RS$(255,204)$ is impractical despite an average loss rate of 1%, while RLNC requires 15.5~Mbit to recover all 1000 packets. An RS+RLNC hybrid reduces overhead by 19% relative to pure RLNC at BER$=10^{-3}$. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first analytical derivation of the rate-normalised crossover $p^*$ between RS and RLNC and the first experimental confirmation of the bridging property under a physically derived satellite channel model.
Distributed satellite antennas deliver broadband closer than expected
Modeling and Performance Evaluation of Distributed Satellite Antennas: Space Is Much Closer Than One Might Think
Abstract: Distributed satellites can deliver broadband connectivity directly to commercial handsets. In the formation of arrays (FoA) architecture, cooperating satellites synthesize a large aperture whoseextent depends on their number, arrangement, and spacing, with intersatellite distances ranging from tens of meters to hundreds of kilometers. For representative S-band geostationary and low-Earth-orbit configurations, the Fraunhofer distance may exceed the nadir link range at spacings on the order of a hundred meters. Therefore, accurate assessment of FoA performance across satellite populations and spacings requires spherical-wave modeling for users in the radiative near field, below the formation's Fraunhofer distance. Planar models of satellite positions, array orientations, and user locations must also be assessed against spherical geometries accounting for orbital and Earth curvature. This paper combines these models to quantify how simplifying assumptions affect throughput and outage probability. Numerical results show that multi-antenna precoding based on a local plane-wave approximation within each satellite array closely matches the spherical-wave reference. A global plane-wave approximation can instead cause severe losses, including full outage. In the investigated scenarios, formation curvature has little impact, whereas neglecting Earth curvature overestimates low-Earth-orbit throughput. These findings clarify when geometric and propagation approximations remain reliable and demonstrate that, for large distributed antenna apertures, space is much closer than one might think.