voice interface designers

Abstract: People who are blind or have low vision (BLV) are largely excluded from 3D modeling tools that rely on visual representations of geometry. Natural language descriptions offer a potential path to accessibility, but it is unclear whether language alone can support the deep spatial understanding that editing, not just browsing, requires. Advances in generative AI offer the promise of automatic model description, yet descriptions suited to BLV modelers are structurally distinct from alt-text and from existing 3D model captioning datasets, and the domain-specific requirements for generating them are not well understood. We address this through two coordinated studies: an autoethnographic pilot in which the blind first author worked with 12 sighted participants to develop a taxonomy of descriptive strategies, and a Wizard-of-Oz main study that applied those strategies as idealized scripts with 10 BLV participants. We identify a systematic use-to-editing gap: descriptions that support accurate but incomplete mental models are insufficient for specifying modifications, because editing requires knowing the state of features the user did not know to ask about. We show that this gap produces four failure types (accuracy, completeness, expression, and navigation) that accuracy-focused evaluation frameworks cannot detect. We propose a two-phase evaluation framework that diagnoses the failure type a description system exhibits and guides developers toward targeted design interventions, thereby providing a methodological standard for assessing whether description-based systems genuinely support BLV modelers as creators.

Abstract: Post-training often improves the performance of large audio-language models on audio understanding and reasoning benchmarks. However, these improvements may reflect adaptation to specific question formats, such as multiple-choice questions, rather than genuine advances in audio understanding and reasoning capabilities. To investigate what LALMs actually learn from post-training, we conduct controlled experiments that disentangle improvements in audio understanding from adaptation to specific question formats. Across different models and post-training methods, we find that much of the reported improvement persists even without informative audio, but largely disappears when the question format changes. These findings suggest that post-training often teaches models to exploit task-specific textual cues and answer patterns rather than developing generalizable audio understanding and reasoning capabilities.

Abstract: Personal-agent memory has largely focused on learning what users know, prefer, and want. However, knowing the user does not necessarily mean knowing what the user and the agent have established together. An assistant's proposal should not become an authorized instruction merely because it is remembered. We introduce Grounding Awareness, the ability to distinguish accepted, unacknowledged, revised, and scoped arrangements when selecting actions. We develop a controlled benchmark to test whether agents can tell the difference between proposals users have accepted and those they have not, and whether they apply accepted arrangements only where appropriate. Across multiple agents and memory systems, we find that strong memory performance does not ensure Grounding Awareness. More surprisingly, providing more complete user information can increase execution of unacknowledged proposals, while persistent memory can cause agents to treat these proposals as if they were user instructions. We trace these failures through memory writing, retrieval, and action selection. Finally, we introduce Grounding Layer, a lightweight, training-free extension that explicitly tracks grounding status and checks consequential actions, substantially improving agent behavior without modifying models or memory systems.