Papers for

voice communication engineers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Predicted speech quality scores often disagree with human preferences

How Reliable Are Predicted MOS for Reproducing Human System-Level Preferences in Speech Enhancement?

Abstract: We investigate whether predicted Mean Opinion Scores (MOS) can reliably support system-level comparisons of speech enhancement (SE) methods by introducing system-level preference accuracy (SPA). Although MOS prediction models are widely used to evaluate SE systems, their performance is typically assessed by correlation with human-rated MOS, which does not guarantee agreement on which system is better. SPA addresses this gap by directly evaluating whether predicted and human-rated MOS yield the same system preferences. Using SPA, we systematically evaluate three settings: single prediction models, ensembling, and domain adaptation. Through experiments, SPA varies substantially across single prediction models, from 9.4% to 76.8%. Even the best model disagrees with human judgments in approximately 23% of system comparisons. Ensembling yields only limited improvement, while domain adaptation tends to substantially improve SPA in the closed condition but brings only modest gains in the more practical open condition, where neither the target systems nor the speakers are known. These results suggest that SPA can reveal errors correlation-based evaluation alone does not expose, and that predicted MOS alone can lead to unreliable conclusions in practical SE system comparison.

Wed 30 SeptSound
The gist
People often use predicted scores called MOS to judge how good speech enhancement methods sound, but these scores don’t always match what humans prefer. The authors introduce a new way to measure how well these predicted scores agree with human choices when picking better systems. They found that even the best prediction models still disagree with humans about a quarter of the time. Improving predictions by combining models or adapting them to new conditions helps only a little, especially for unknown speakers or systems.
Open → 2609.39032v1

Corrective forcing improves speech quality in generative enhancement models

Corrective Forcing: Unified Post-Training for Diffusions and Flows in Generative Speech Enhancement

Abstract: Diffusion and flow models, as promising generative paradigms for speech enhancement, face a training--inference mismatch: training uses analytical path states, whereas inference recursively evaluates models on self-generated rollout states along discretized sampling trajectories. This mismatch causes prediction and discretization errors to accumulate. To address it, we introduce Corrective Forcing (CoF), a post-training paradigm that forces diffusion and flow models to learn from self-generated rollouts and correct their predictions. CoF corrects clean-speech predictions on rollout states toward the ground truth under dynamic sampling schedules, exposing the model to varying inference conditions. It further regularizes local evolution using locally corrected counterfactual transitions as references for factual transitions. By expressing model outputs through a shared clean-speech prediction parameterization, CoF applies the same post-training objective across diffusion and flow formulations. Experiments with SB-VE and OT-CFM demonstrate improvements in perceptual quality and reconstruction fidelity, together with robust performance across different numbers of sampling steps.

Mon 21 SeptMachine LearningArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Speech enhancement models that generate clean audio can make errors when they try to fix noisy speech step-by-step, because they are trained differently than they are used in practice. The authors introduce a method called Corrective Forcing that lets these models learn from their own mistakes after training, improving their ability to produce clearer speech. This method works for different kinds of generative models and helps them make better predictions even when the process is stopped early or takes more steps. Overall, it results in more natural-sounding and accurate speech enhancement.
Open → 2609.24651v1