Papers for
visual content creators
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Improving text-to-image generation by handling negation clearly
Negation without Confusion: Decomposing Bias and Recomposing Style in Text Embeddings for Negation-aware Image Generation
Abstract: Negation-aware image generation remains challenging for text-to-image diffusion models, which often struggle with negation due to implicit linguistic biases that are deeply entangled within text representations. As a result, bias-aligned semantics frequently dominate over intended negative constraints. To overcome this limitation, we propose a simple training-free method of Decompose and Recompose text embedding (Dero), which constructs a semantic-preserving subspace and a bias subspace using auxiliary prompts and performs semantic disentanglement based on bidirectional SVD. By decomposing entangled representations and selectively recomposing disentangled semantic components, Dero realigns text representations toward intended negation semantics while restoring residual stylistic features to preserve semantic fidelity and image quality. As a model-agnostic inference-time framework operating solely on text representations, Dero can be seamlessly applied to diverse diffusion architectures, including both U-Net and DiT based models. Extensive experiments on both object- and concept-level negation demonstrate consistent improvements in negation-aware image generation, achieving stronger text-image alignment, better semantic fidelity, and higher human preference scores.
Thinking reward model improves visual generation quality control
Think Before You Score: Thinking Reward Model for Visual Generation
Abstract: Visual reward models are essential for evaluating and improving visual generation models, yet existing approaches typically map task conditions and candidate outputs directly to scalar rewards, leaving implicit what should be evaluated for each individual case. We introduce Think Before You Score, a paradigm that explicitly determines what matters for each case before judging how well the candidate performs. Following this principle, we propose the Thinking Reward Model (TRM), which formulates case-adaptive rubrics, performs rubric-guided assessment, and produces fine-grained pointwise rewards. We further observe that conventional pairwise preference optimization can induce score polarization, and introduce Pairwise Dual-Group Relative Policy Optimization (PD-GRPO), which leverages pairwise supervision to improve reward discrimination while preserving fine-grained pointwise scoring. Extensive experiments on image generation and editing reward-modeling benchmarks demonstrate that TRM achieves state-of-the-art performance among open-source reward models while remaining highly competitive with proprietary alternatives. Moreover, using TRM as a reward for reinforcement learning consistently improves diverse visual generation models, demonstrating that its fine-grained, case-adaptive rewards translate into effective optimization signals for visual generation.