Papers for

video security teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

AI generates fewer calculations for spotting fake videos fast

Temporal Slice Learning for AI-Generated Video Detection with 400$\times$ Fewer FLOPs

Abstract: Recent advances in generative video models have improved visual realism, making detection increasingly dependent on subtle temporal inconsistencies. However, these signals are weak and spatially localized, while most of the video content is redundant. This creates a fundamental mismatch: existing detectors rely on heavy backbones to model full videos, which leads to high computational cost and limited scalability. In this work, we rethink AI-generated video detection from a representation perspective. Instead of modeling entire videos, we restructure them into compact temporal slice representations that isolate informative temporal evolution. We introduce a lightweight framework using frequency-aware temporal slice consistency learning, where informative spatial rows and columns are aggregated over time to form slice-domain inputs. This reparameterization suppresses redundant appearance while preserving discriminative temporal dynamics, enabling efficient and targeted detection. By constructing slices from both high- and low-frequency regions, our method exposes complementary temporal artifacts, including unstable details and abnormal motion smoothness. We instantiate this idea in a Temporal Slice Consistency Network, which integrates task-driven slice localization, hierarchical positional encoding, and a lightweight Transformer to model cross-slice and cross-frequency dependencies. We further introduce AI-Artist, a new benchmark with artist-curated videos from recent high-fidelity generators, including Seedance and Kling. Experiments on GenVideo and AI-Artist show that our method achieves strong performance while requiring over 400$\times$ fewer model-forward FLOPs and 3.6$\times$ faster model inference than the strong video-based baseline ReStraV (2.9$\times$ faster end to end, including preprocessing), enabling scalable and practical deployment.

Mon 26 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Detecting AI-created fake videos is harder as they look more real, with only tiny timing errors to spot. The authors offer a new way to look at videos by slicing just key parts over time, cutting out repeated content. This approach uses much less computing work but still catches weird moves and details that reveal fakes. Their method runs hundreds of times faster than earlier ones and works well on real examples from modern AI video tools.
Open → 2610.35148v1

Audio visual method detects edits in long videos with sparse changes

AV-FABLE: Audio-Visual Manipulation Forensics in Long-Form Videos

Abstract: Localized AI manipulations in long-form videos often affect brief events within otherwise authentic content, making video-level classification insufficient for forensic analysis. Existing audio-visual deepfake benchmarks largely focus on short talking-head clips, while long-form temporal forensics remains predominantly visual. We introduce AV-FABLE, a dual-timeline benchmark for sparse manipulations in open-scene long-form audio-visual videos. AV-FABLE contains 16,650 pristine--manipulated twin pairs (998 hours) created with 27 editing configurations, with separate audio and visual timelines that enable modality-specific temporal localization and expose errors hidden by joint-timeline evaluation. On AV-FABLE, zero-shot prompting of audio-visual large language models (AV-LLMs) yields near-chance detection and poor temporal localization. In contrast, supervised readouts of their frozen perception features recover strong forensic signals, suggesting manipulation evidence is encoded in these representations but not effectively exposed through language outputs. Motivated by this observation, we propose NFSR(Native Forensics via Separated Readouts), which reads frozen AV-LLM features with separate audio and visual temporal decoders. NFSR achieves the best audio-visual localization performance in-domain and across all three out-of-distribution settings, including transfer to held-out videos from an external long-video forensic benchmark. AV-FABLE, code, and model weights will be publicly released.

Sat 24 OctComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionMultimedia
The gist
It can be hard to find small edited parts in long videos that mostly look real. The authors created a big test set called AV-FABLE with many long videos that have small audio or visual edits, to help find these tricky changes. They tried using big audio-visual language models to spot edits but got almost random results. However, when they used parts of these models in a new way that looks separately at audio and video, they could find the edited parts much better. Their approach works well even on new videos not seen before.
Open → 2610.33413v1

Ai video detector improves artifact spotting and explanation accuracy

Verus-Insight: Towards Explainable Artifact Detection in AI-Generated Videos

Abstract: Recent advances in video generation have made synthetic videos increasingly realistic, placing greater demands on reliable AI-generated video detection. Existing artifact-based detectors typically identify generation artifacts as evidence for source prediction, yet they may either fail to recognize subtle artifacts or reach the correct source decision without faithfully identifying the evidence underlying it. In this work, we systematically investigate how to design and train effective artifact detectors and formulate artifact detection as a structured process comprising three complementary capabilities: Inspection Planning, which determines what should be examined; Evidence Verification, which verifies whether the inspected content exhibits genuine generation artifacts; and Evidence Aggregation, which integrates the verified evidence into the final source decision. Building on this formulation, we introduce Verus-Insight, trained with human-anchored full-process supervision and progressive capability training to strengthen both fine-grained artifact detection and video-level detection. We further introduce Verus-Bench, a benchmark with fine-grained human annotations of perceptible artifacts for evaluating artifact detection. Extensive experiments across diverse benchmarks demonstrate that Verus-Insight achieves strong performance in both fine-grained artifact analysis and AI-generated video detection, with substantial gains in recovering human-perceived artifacts. Further analyses reveal that the three capabilities are complementary yet distinct, and that Verus-Insight more reliably converts relevant inspection targets into supported artifact evidence without increasing spurious artifact claims.

Thu 22 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Detecting videos created by AI can be tricky because the fake parts might be subtle or hard to identify. The authors studied how detection systems can be better designed by breaking the process into three parts: deciding what to check, confirming if what is checked really shows signs of AI creation, and combining all the findings to make a final call. They built a system called Verus-Insight that learns from detailed human input to do these steps well. Their tests show that Verus-Insight not only spots AI-generated videos better but also explains its decisions more clearly by pointing out the real clues.
Open → 2610.30866v1

Model learns to pick video moments that explain anomalies better

Learning Temporal Evidence Selection for Video Anomaly Understanding

Abstract: Video anomaly understanding (VAU) aims to generate language-level interpretations of anomalous events in long videos, requiring visual evidence that supports explanation beyond anomaly detection alone. Existing VAU pipelines commonly rely on anomaly-centric or predefined temporal sampling strategies, which efficiently emphasize suspicious moments but overlook contextual cues, object interactions, and temporally distributed evidence needed for reasoning. Motivated by recent progress in learnable temporal selection for long-video question answering, we revisit VAU temporal sampling as a downstream-aligned evidence selection problem. We introduce the semantic-conditioned Temporal Sampling Q-Former that learns to select temporal visual evidence through the VAU generation objective. Since generic VAU prompts provide weak video-specific guidance, we condition the sampler on CLIP-embedded object tags automatically extracted from the input video. These tags are used only for temporal evidence selection and are not appended to the LLM generation prompt, separating sampler conditioning from prompt augmentation. The proposed sampler operates in visual-token space, computes soft temporal selection weights from frame-level representations, and merges duplicated selections before response generation. Experiments on HIVAU-70K show that our model achieves the best performance among the compared fine-tuned models, while ablations demonstrate that learnable temporal sampling improves over fixed anomaly-focused sampling and that CLIP-embedded object-tag conditioning further improves over generic-prompt conditioning. Our results suggest that temporal sampling in VAU should be aligned with explanation-oriented evidence utility rather than anomaly saliency alone.

Mon 12 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Understanding strange or unusual events in long videos means explaining what happens, not just spotting when something is odd. The authors show that picking which parts of the video to look at is important for good explanations. They made a model that learns to choose video moments based on objects it sees, improving the detail in explanations over just focusing on the most obviously strange parts. Their approach works better than previous methods on a big test set of annotated videos.
Open → 2610.16299v1

Motion aware deepfake videos can be detected with new method

Stop My Dancing! Understanding, Detecting and Attributing Motion-Aware Deepfake Videos

Abstract: Pose-guided diffusion models can now synthesize entire human figures in motion, spawning a new class of deepfakes: Motion Aware Deepfake (MAD) that have already reached hundreds of millions of viewers. To better understand this emerging threat, we construct the first MAD-specific benchmark and measurement framework, containing over 1.5 million frames that mix 1,363 real and 30,122 synthetic videos from six controllable generators, with realistic perturbations and open-world evaluation splits. Then, we dissect MAD and discover that, despite their global coherence, these videos betray faint yet reliable cues: because the model relies on limited input frames for motion synthesis, it must predict and simulate coherent movement at motion boundaries, thereby producing high-frequency artifacts along with model-specific spectral fingerprints. Based on the observations obtained from analysis on dataset, we propose MoDA, the first defense framework tailored to detect and attribute MAD videos. MoDA couples spatial semantics with steganalysis-rich frequency features via cross-domain alignment and multi-scale aggregation, achieving 94.8% in-distribution and 89.1% cross-dataset detection accuracy gains of 10% to 25% over prior work and 91.5% model attribution accuracy. MoDA achieves 81.94% accuracy on 200 clips produced by two unseen commercial MAD platforms, indicating promising zero-shot transfer, and 78.13% detection accuracy on 1,200 unseen MAD video clips (55k frames in total) collected from the open Internet. Under white-box, gray-box, and black-box adaptive attacks, MoDA maintains relatively stable detection and attribution performance while the accuracies of the baselines drop rapidly.

Thu 8 OctComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionCryptography and Security
The gist
Fake videos that show moving people can now be made very realistically, which can trick many viewers. The authors created a large test collection of these fake videos and real ones to better understand them. They found these videos have tiny signs in how movement is created that give them away. Using these clues, they built a system called MoDA that can detect and say which method made the fake video with high accuracy. MoDA also works well on unseen fake videos and can still detect fakes even when attackers try to hide them.
Open → 2610.11496v1

Unified score matching improves video anomaly detection and anticipation

A Unified Score Matching Paradigm for Video Anomaly Detection and Anticipation

Abstract: Video anomaly detection (VAD) is a fundamental and safety-critical task in computer vision. Recent generative approaches detect anomalies from a distributional perspective, but remain limited by local anomaly modes. Meanwhile, video anomaly anticipation (VAA), as a proactive extension beyond post-hoc detection, introduces additional challenges. In particular, the contrastive inference paradigm in VAD, which relies on ground-truth frames, is not applicable to VAA, hindering its development. To address these challenges, we propose a unified score-driven framework, termed Uni-DSM, based on denoising score matching (DSM), which models anomaly patterns through likelihood estimation and score functions over the learned data distribution. Within this unified framework, we adopt a shared noise-conditioned score transformer backbone with scene-dependent embeddings and motion-aware weighting for distribution-level modeling. Instead of introducing separate architectures, Uni-DSM unifies VAD and VAA through different inference and supervision paradigms built upon the same score-based formulation. For VAD, we instantiate an autoregressive denoising score matching (ADSM) mechanism, which progressively accumulates anomalous evidence via autoregressive denoising, enabling enhanced perception of local modes beyond visual cues. For VAA, we extend the same architecture by incorporating a lightweight auxiliary decoder and a novel self-distilled denoising score matching (SDSM) mechanism. By constructing supervision from output discrepancies instead of relying on unavailable future ground truth, our method achieves efficient training suitable or early anomaly anticipation. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate state-of-the-art performance in both VAD and VAA while maintaining high efficiency, establishing a unified and scalable pipeline from anomaly detection to anticipation.

Thu 8 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Detecting unusual events in videos is important for safety, but current methods struggle with some local details and predicting problems before they happen. The authors propose a single method called Uni-DSM that uses a score-matching approach to better understand normal video patterns and spot when something unusual occurs or is about to occur. Their method shares parts of the model for both finding and anticipating anomalies, overcoming previous limitations that needed future video frames to learn. Tests on several video datasets show their method performs better and faster than existing ones for both detecting and predicting unexpected events.
Open → 2610.11149v1

Deepfake detection improves with explicit forensic video features

Interpretable Deepfake Detection in Videos via Explicit Forensic Features and Temporal Modeling

Abstract: Deepfake detection in videos remains challenging, as manipulated content may appear visually consistent at the frame level while exhibiting subtle temporal inconsistencies. This paper introduces an interpretable deepfake detection framework that models spatially and temporally coherent facial features in video sequences. Unlike end-to-end deep models relying on implicit representations, the proposed approach explicitly encodes physically grounded forensic cues, enabling transparent analysis and improved multi-dataset generalization. The pipeline transforms videos into identity-consistent facial trajectories, segments them into fixed-length temporal windows, and represents each frame using 68 structured descriptors spanning four complementary domains: photometric, textural, geometric, and compression-based features. These descriptors provide a compact multi-domain representation of manipulation artifacts and are processed by a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network to capture temporal dependencies and subtle irregularities. Evaluation on four benchmark datasets, FaceForensics++, Celeb-DF v2, a curated subset of the DeepFake Detection Challenge (DFDC), and DeeperForensics, yields strong and consistent F1-scores of 98.0%, 91.0%, 97.6%, and 96.2%, respectively. The approach also demonstrated a good cross-dataset generalization, providing a robust and interpretable solution for video deepfake detection.

Fri 2 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Detecting videos altered by deepfake technology is hard because fake faces can look real in single frames but show small inconsistencies over time. The authors present a method that watches how facial features change across frames using clear and understandable clues, like lighting, texture, shape, and video compression artifacts. Their approach helps detect deepfakes better across different video collections and explains why the detection works. It uses a special type of neural network to spot subtle timing problems that reveal if the video is fake.
Open → 2610.03380v1

AI videos detected using first-digit gradient statistics and analysis

A Generalizable and Explainable Framework for Synthetic Video Detection Using First-Digit Gradient Statistics

Abstract: AI video generators have not only become harder to detect but are used to generate a diverse set of scenarios from landscapes to street views to animal videos. This creates a problem where CNN-based detectors are effective but offer no insight into their inner workings, while forensics-based detectors are often pretrained for a set scenario or become too complex to derive meaningful insights. We present a novel approach to AI video detection using Sobel gradient values analysed with the first-digit law. Using linear discriminant analysis, we visualise the discriminatory signal, while a multi-layer perceptron is used for classification. The detection method has no generator- or scenespecific features, and the model has no knowledge of container formats, codec, bitrate, or compression artefacts. The model is trained and tested on GenBuster-200K, GenBusterBench, GenVA, FaceForensics++ C23, and CelebDF. We also show how zero-shot detection fails even though the feature set carries a discriminatory signal.

Wed 30 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Detecting AI-generated videos is getting harder because they can show many different scenes. The authors developed a new way to spot these videos by looking at the edges in the images using a special math rule about numbers, called the first-digit law. Their method doesn’t rely on knowing what kind of video generator made the video or details like compression, making it very general. They tested their approach on multiple big datasets and showed how it works even when others fail. This helps explain why their method can tell real from fake videos in many cases.
Open → 2609.39585v1

Audio video translation boosts video deepfake detection accuracy

Cross-modal Translation via Conditional Latent Denoising for Video Deepfake Detection

Abstract: The growing threat of video deepfakes necessitates multimodal detection. Beyond serving as independent indicators of authenticity, audio and visual signals have intrinsic dependencies that also provide an essential criterion for detection. Previous methods often overlook the cross-modal correspondences, hindering information transfer between domains and leaving crucial detection cues unexplored. To address this challenge, we propose a framework called Cross-modal Translation via Conditional Latent Denoising (CTCLD) for video deepfake detection. It connects the distinct distributions of heterogeneous modalities in latent spaces, enabling smooth cross-domain information transfer to improve detection performance. We first establish a Bayesian foundation by decomposing the audio-visual joint distribution. Subsequently, CTCLD translates both modalities via bidirectional latent denoising conditioned on each other, effectively capturing subtle inconsistencies in the manipulated signals. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed CTCLD enables comprehensive domain alignment, resulting in a robust video deepfake detection approach with competitive performance.

Sun 27 SeptArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Detecting fake videos created by altering both sound and visuals is hard because the two parts are connected in subtle ways. The authors came up with a method that helps the computer translate information between audio and video signals to spot inconsistencies caused by manipulation. This approach looks at how the audio and visual parts relate inside the computer’s hidden understanding, making detection better. Tests show their method can find deepfakes more reliably by comparing the two signals carefully.
Open → 2609.33394v1

AI generated videos detected by tracking motion consistency patterns

TRACE: Trajectory Representation and Consistency Estimation for AI-Generated Video Detection

Abstract: Recent advances in generative video models have enabled the synthesis of visually realistic content, posing significant challenges to synthetic video detection. Existing detectors often rely on appearance artifacts, semantic inconsistencies, and temporal patterns that may be generator-specific, limitating generalization to unseen synthesis models. We investigate whether responses to a pretrained generative model provide more transferable forensic cues. Our key observation is that real and AI-generated videos exhibit distinct \emph{velocity responses} under a pretrained Flow Matching video model. This distinction persists when different pretrained video-generation backbones are used as probes, suggesting that velocity responses offer transferable forensic signals beyond visual artificts. Motivated by this observation, we propose \textbf{TRACE} (\emph{\underline{T}rajectory \underline{R}epresentation \underline{a}nd \underline{C}onsistency \underline{E}stimation}), a generation-process-aware framework for AI-generated video detection. TRACE leverages a pretrained video DiT as a velocity-field probe to extract representations at multiple flow time points, and models cross-frame consistency through velocity differences between adjacent frames. We further introduce a \emph{Real-Centered Trajectory Optimization} objective that encourages generator-invariant representation learning. Extensive experiments on AIGVDBench demonstrate that TRACE generalizes effectively across diverse generators, substantially outperforming prior state-of-the-art methods on unseen open- and closed-source video generation models.

Tue 22 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Detecting videos made by AI is hard because fake videos often look very real and use different tricks. The authors found that real and AI videos behave differently when analyzed through a special tool that looks at their motion patterns, not just how they look. They created a method called TRACE that studies how movements change between video frames, which helps tell real videos apart from AI-generated ones, even if the AI used is new or unseen before. This makes the detection more reliable across many types of synthetic videos.
Open → 2609.25775v1

Deepfake detection improves with pulse and face movement analysis

Beyond Ambiguous Visual Cues: Studying Physiological Disruptions and Cross-Modal Inconsistencies in Deepfake Videos

Abstract: Recent deepfake detection studies increasingly suggest remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) signals as an authenticity cue. However, existing benchmarks lack physiological ground truth, and current detectors underexplore the cross-level relationship between facial features and physiological dynamics, often relying on late fusion or rPPG features alone. In this paper, we construct high-fidelity deepfake manipulations on established real rPPG datasets (COHFACE and UBFC-rPPG) to investigate how forgeries disrupt natural physiological signals and facial behavior at the same time. Building on this analysis, we propose a bidirectional co-attention fusion detector that jointly models rPPG and facial behavior tokens. This mechanism explicitly captures the cross-level dependencies between pulse dynamics and facial motion to learn a robust, joint authenticity representation. Extensive experiments using a subject-disjoint 5-fold evaluation demonstrate the superiority of our approach. Achieving a 92.80\% AUC on constructed datasets using face swapping and 96.78\% AUC on motion transfer, our model outperforms both the rPPG-only single modality baseline and the best feature-level fusion methods. Furthermore, transfer-learning result of the fusion detector on Celeb-DF-v2 while keeping both feature extractors fixed achieves 91.20\% accuracy and 86.08\% AUC, which suggests applicability under target-domain adaptation.

Fri 11 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Deepfake videos are fake videos often created by swapping or changing faces in videos. The authors show that these fake videos disrupt natural body signals like heartbeats seen in face color changes. They created a method that looks at both the heartbeat signals and facial movements together to better spot fakes. Their approach performs better than methods looking at just one of these signs and works well even on new datasets.
Open → 2609.12668v1

AI generated videos become almost impossible to detect by humans or tools

DF26: We Cannot Tell Fake From Real Anymore

Abstract: We introduce DF26, a novel benchmark for detecting AI-generated videos containing fully synthetic clips produced by recent text-to-video and image-to-video models. The videos capture single-person public-speaking scenarios, spanning direct-to-camera recordings, official statements, and studio interviews - 271 real and 2,420 synthetic videos generated by seven modern video models. The study on DF26 shows that human performance in detecting AI-generated videos, as well as state-of-the-art deepfake detectors, is close to random chance. Our results highlight the limitations of current evaluation protocols and motivate the need for benchmarks that explicitly measure robustness to modern generative model distribution shifts.

Mon 7 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
People find it nearly impossible to tell if certain videos of someone speaking on camera are real or made by AI. The authors created DF26, a set of videos including hundreds of real clips and thousands made by different AI models, to test detection skills. Both humans and the latest fake video detectors performed no better than guessing. This shows current methods to find fake videos are not reliable anymore with newer AI-generated media.
Open → 2609.07369v1