Papers for
video content platforms
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Video language models generate intermediate event chains for causal reasoning
From Cause to Effect: Generating Intermediate Event Chains in Videos
Abstract: Video-Language Models (VLMs) excel at visual recognition but struggle with causal reasoning. Current evaluations are flawed: multiple-choice QA allows shortcuts, and open-ended QA lacks robust automatic evaluation. We introduce Causal Chain Generation (CCG), a novel task where models have to generate the sequence of intermediate events connecting a cause and an effect. This structured setup demands genuine reasoning and enables reliable automatic scoring. We accompany this task with two complementary metrics: SODA-Embedding, which measures the semantic matching of a generated chain against a reference, and Causal-QA, which probes the chain's causal coherence by asking whether it contains the specific causal facts needed to reconstruct the narrative. We provide two test sets: SF20K-CC, a manually annotated diagnostic on 20 short films, and CMD-CC, a movie clip benchmark derived from audio descriptions. Our analysis reveals that state-of-the-art VLMs struggle with narrative causality understanding, frequently hallucinating or omitting key events. To address this, we fine-tune VLMs with GRPO using a composite reward that combines a format reward, SODA-Embedding, and Causal-QA accuracy, demonstrating substantial improvements over strong baselines.
Audio and video combined improve reasoning in ai models
OmniReasoning: Pushing the Limits of Audio-Visual Joint Reasoning
Abstract: Recent advances have enabled unified omni-modal models in understanding audio, vision, and language. However, existing benchmarks, training data, and learning methods largely treat the modalities independently, leaving the capability of audio-visual joint reasoning poorly evaluated and insufficiently elicited. We address this gap with a benchmark, data engine, and learning method. First, we introduce OmniReasoningBench, a benchmark where both audio and visual evidence are indispensable. It comprises 1,150 multiple-choice and open-ended questions across two tasks, reasoning over video and reasoning beyond video. Second, we develop a data engine OmniQA. It automatically constructs evidence-grounded QA pairs that explicitly necessitate audio-visual joint reasoning, together with time-stamped clue chains that guide the annotation of thinking process. Besides our benchmark, this engine produces training data OmniReasoning-SFT-112K and OmniReasoning-RL-19K. Finally, we propose an on-policy self-distillation method Modality-Factored Self-Distillation (MFSD). It evaluates each sampled response under modality-specific clue contexts, disentangling the contributions of individual clues and their cross-modal interactions for token-level credit assignment. With our training data and learning method, our model OmniReasoning-30B-A3B achieves 50.0% on OmniVideoBench and 42.5% on OmniReasoningBench, improving the base model Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Thinking by 12.8 and 9.3 percentage points, respectively. Moreover, it delivers substantial gains on general and long-video benchmarks, including Video-MME-v2. We hope our work offers a solid step for facilitating future research in omni-modal joint reasoning.
Emotion grounded video captioning reduces misleading background bias
Causal-EVC: Breaking Emotional Spurious Causality via Spatiotemporal Grounding and Counterfactual Intervention
Abstract: Emotional Video Captioning aims to generate factually accurate and emotionally empathetic descriptions. While recent methods have recognized the importance of visual causes to guide emotion perception and caption generation, they fundamentally rely on simple attention matching, which inevitably suffers from {causal redundancy and spurious correlations} in co-occurrence bias (e.g., misclassifying ``sadness'' as ``joy'' on a sunny beach), leading to severe shortcut learning from confusing backgrounds. Furthermore, existing evaluations fail to verify whether models have genuinely mastered causal reasoning or merely exploited background confounders. To address these limitations, we first construct {EVC-CauseGround}, a comprehensive benchmark with dense spatio-temporal causal annotations. Crucially, it introduces a carefully selected {Causal-Faithfulness Subset} to explicitly quantify genuine emotion-cause attribution. Second, we propose {Causal-EVC}, an emotion-grounding captioning framework, which introduces a Motion-guided Causal Spatiotemporal Localization module to precisely decouple causal triggers from background confounders. Besides, we introduce an Interpretable Sparse Emotion Routing module. By synthesizing counterfactual representations and formulating a novel counterfactual contrastive objective, we enforce the model to anchor its emotion predictions strictly on authentic causal triggers instead of confusing background. Extensive experiments show that Causal-EVC not only achieves the best performance on semantic metrics but also exhibits significant advantages in the causal-faithfulness subset, which demonstrates that our model could mine emotional cues from genuine visual causes and mitigate co-occurrence bias for interpretable multimodal emotion understanding.