Papers for

vehicle software developers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Adaptive cruise control adjusts settings for different driving scenarios

Cross-Scenario Controller Parameter Transformation from Real-World Driving Data through Flow Matching

Abstract: Advanced Driver Assistance Systems have become increasingly widespread, aiming to support drivers, reduce workload, and improve traffic safety. However, many systems are rarely used because their behavior feels unnatural and does not match individual driving behavior. The growing availability of large-scale, real-world human driving data enables more human-like and driver-individual assistance functions. This paper formulates the adaptation of Adaptive Cruise Control parameters as a driver-individual scenario-to-scenario transport problem, transforming controller parameters from one driving context to another. Using flow matching, we train a generative model to predict the target-scenario behavior of previously unseen drivers from only a few demonstrations in a source scenario. We compare the approach with a linear parameter-shift baseline and evaluate flow-matching variants incorporating driver-consistent coupling, driver embeddings, and classifier-free guidance based on driving profiles extracted from trajectory data using a variational autoencoder.

Fri 23 OctMachine Learning
The gist
Many driver assistance systems feel strange because they don’t match how individual people drive. This paper shows how to change settings for cruise control from one driving situation to another based on only a few examples of how a person drives in the first situation. The authors use a math technique called flow matching to predict how a driver would behave in a new scenario. Their method is smarter than simple ways that just shift settings linearly and includes ways to capture each driver’s unique habits.
Open → 2610.32719v1

SecJev improves security decision models with expert training

SecJev: Bringing Security Expertise to System One Decision Models

Abstract: Security workflows need models that turn complex observations and explicit policies into decisions. System One models introduced by Jev return typed predictions and probabilities; security specialization supplies the domain expertise behind those predictions. We introduce SecJev, to our knowledge the first family of Jev-like decision models specialized for security, spanning 0.8B to 9B parameters. Built on Kev's single-pass candidate scorer, SecJev learns Boolean, choice, and ordered decisions from text, telemetry, and observation histories. We develop SecJev-Corpus to unify source-label prediction and explicit-policy evaluation across 14 tasks and eight sources. It covers tool outputs, traffic, federated updates, consensus, authentication, and vehicle messages. Scene-weighted training adapts the models across these domains while preserving a shared typed decision interface. Security specialization improves every model in the family; SecJev-0.8B outperforms general Kev-9B by 20.51 percentage points in task-macro accuracy. Comparisons with answer-only generative fine-tuning show close accuracy and latency with lower peak inference memory. Tests on new source groups reproduce gains over Kev in prompt-injection and traffic decisions, with capture-dependent false alarms. We release adapters, decision heads, SecJev-Corpus, and training and inference code.

Fri 2 OctCryptography and SecurityComputation and Language
The gist
Security systems have to make smart decisions using lots of complicated information and rules. The authors built SecJev, a special kind of decision-making model trained specifically for security tasks, that works better than more general models with many more parameters. SecJev learns from many different types of security data and tasks, helping it make more accurate and reliable security decisions. The team also shared tools and data to help others build on their work.
Open → 2610.03073v1

Vision language models improve adaptive driver alerting timing and accuracy

Observe Before You Alert: Adaptive Driver Alerting with Vision-Language Models

Abstract: Driver alerting from dashcam video requires sequential decision-making under partial observability: a system must decide not only whether a scene is risky, but also when the evidence is sufficient to warn. Most existing accident anticipation models output a binary risk score, leaving ambiguous scenes to be handled by thresholding. We propose VLAlert, a vision-language alerting framework that casts warning generation as a tri-action policy over SILENT, OBSERVE, and ALERT. The OBSERVE action acts as an internal evidence-gathering decision that delays uncertain warnings and changes the next observation window, creating a lightweight perception-action loop for adaptive alerting. VLAlert uses Qwen3-VL-4B as a safety-evidence generator and pools hidden states from structured belief spans to form compact representations for danger estimation and policy prediction. We evaluate VLAlert on VLAlert-Bench, a unified per-tick benchmark from four real-world dashcam alert datasets, and further test transfer to held-out naturalistic ADAS takeover clips. On VLAlert-Bench validation, VLAlert achieves the highest deployment-oriented utility among tested baselines, with DAUS 0.4878 compared with 0.4752 for Open-BADAS, and improves AUROC, AP_tick, F1_t, and balanced accuracy from 0.610, 0.176, 0.276, and 0.581 to 0.689, 0.195, 0.297, and 0.648, respectively. On 221 held-out ADAS-TO-Critic clips, VLAlert improves R@5s from 74.2% to 88.7% and F1 from 0.585 to 0.686. These results indicate that adaptive observation and safety-focused VLM representations provide measurable gains for driver-facing alert decisions.

Tue 8 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionRobotics
The gist
Driver assistance systems that warn about dangers from dashcam videos usually decide only if there is risk, but not when to warn. The authors introduce VLAlert, which gives the system three choices: stay silent, keep watching, or alert the driver. This lets the system wait for clearer evidence before warning, making alerts more accurate and timely. They tested VLAlert on multiple real-world dashcam datasets and found it improves how well and when warnings are given compared to previous methods.
Open → 2609.08130v1