Papers for
vehicle software developers
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Adaptive cruise control adjusts settings for different driving scenarios
Cross-Scenario Controller Parameter Transformation from Real-World Driving Data through Flow Matching
Abstract: Advanced Driver Assistance Systems have become increasingly widespread, aiming to support drivers, reduce workload, and improve traffic safety. However, many systems are rarely used because their behavior feels unnatural and does not match individual driving behavior. The growing availability of large-scale, real-world human driving data enables more human-like and driver-individual assistance functions. This paper formulates the adaptation of Adaptive Cruise Control parameters as a driver-individual scenario-to-scenario transport problem, transforming controller parameters from one driving context to another. Using flow matching, we train a generative model to predict the target-scenario behavior of previously unseen drivers from only a few demonstrations in a source scenario. We compare the approach with a linear parameter-shift baseline and evaluate flow-matching variants incorporating driver-consistent coupling, driver embeddings, and classifier-free guidance based on driving profiles extracted from trajectory data using a variational autoencoder.
SecJev improves security decision models with expert training
SecJev: Bringing Security Expertise to System One Decision Models
Abstract: Security workflows need models that turn complex observations and explicit policies into decisions. System One models introduced by Jev return typed predictions and probabilities; security specialization supplies the domain expertise behind those predictions. We introduce SecJev, to our knowledge the first family of Jev-like decision models specialized for security, spanning 0.8B to 9B parameters. Built on Kev's single-pass candidate scorer, SecJev learns Boolean, choice, and ordered decisions from text, telemetry, and observation histories. We develop SecJev-Corpus to unify source-label prediction and explicit-policy evaluation across 14 tasks and eight sources. It covers tool outputs, traffic, federated updates, consensus, authentication, and vehicle messages. Scene-weighted training adapts the models across these domains while preserving a shared typed decision interface. Security specialization improves every model in the family; SecJev-0.8B outperforms general Kev-9B by 20.51 percentage points in task-macro accuracy. Comparisons with answer-only generative fine-tuning show close accuracy and latency with lower peak inference memory. Tests on new source groups reproduce gains over Kev in prompt-injection and traffic decisions, with capture-dependent false alarms. We release adapters, decision heads, SecJev-Corpus, and training and inference code.
Vision language models improve adaptive driver alerting timing and accuracy
Observe Before You Alert: Adaptive Driver Alerting with Vision-Language Models
Abstract: Driver alerting from dashcam video requires sequential decision-making under partial observability: a system must decide not only whether a scene is risky, but also when the evidence is sufficient to warn. Most existing accident anticipation models output a binary risk score, leaving ambiguous scenes to be handled by thresholding. We propose VLAlert, a vision-language alerting framework that casts warning generation as a tri-action policy over SILENT, OBSERVE, and ALERT. The OBSERVE action acts as an internal evidence-gathering decision that delays uncertain warnings and changes the next observation window, creating a lightweight perception-action loop for adaptive alerting. VLAlert uses Qwen3-VL-4B as a safety-evidence generator and pools hidden states from structured belief spans to form compact representations for danger estimation and policy prediction. We evaluate VLAlert on VLAlert-Bench, a unified per-tick benchmark from four real-world dashcam alert datasets, and further test transfer to held-out naturalistic ADAS takeover clips. On VLAlert-Bench validation, VLAlert achieves the highest deployment-oriented utility among tested baselines, with DAUS 0.4878 compared with 0.4752 for Open-BADAS, and improves AUROC, AP_tick, F1_t, and balanced accuracy from 0.610, 0.176, 0.276, and 0.581 to 0.689, 0.195, 0.297, and 0.648, respectively. On 221 held-out ADAS-TO-Critic clips, VLAlert improves R@5s from 74.2% to 88.7% and F1 from 0.585 to 0.686. These results indicate that adaptive observation and safety-focused VLM representations provide measurable gains for driver-facing alert decisions.