Papers for

vehicle control engineers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

New finite-data test certifies safe commands under uncertain control limits

Finite-Data Safety Informativity Under Dynamic Asymmetric Actuation

Abstract: When the system model is not fully known, measurement error and limited excitation can leave several models consistent with the same finite data. A command judged safe for one model may fail for another, while limited control authority can prevent the corrective action needed to preserve safety. To ensure safety under model uncertainty and asymmetric input limits, we develop a finite-data certificate that determines whether a command can enforce a prescribed safety inequality. For a linearly parameterized safety channel with exactly known regressors and bounded aggregate residual error, we derive a support formula for the worst-case safety contribution of all data-consistent models. The formula identifies the regressor directions that admit a finite bound, allowing rank-deficient records to contribute to safety certification. Using certified componentwise bounds on actuator tracking error yields an affine inequality with a necessary and sufficient test for pointwise command feasibility. The affine inequality reduces computation of the closest certified command to a scalar root-finding problem. It also yields a closed-form gate that selects the largest certified fraction of a prescribed command segment. The proposed certificate guarantees output safety within its operating domain, provided the feedback is locally Lipschitz and the uncertainty bounds remain valid. Domain retention and full-state continuation extend this guarantee to all time. A vehicle study demonstrates that output safety can be certified from finite measurements in a safety-critical setting with model and actuator uncertainty.

Thu 1 OctRobotics
The gist
When controlling machines like vehicles or robots, it's hard to guarantee safety if you don't fully know how they behave and have limits on how much you can adjust them. This paper by the authors develops a new way to check if a command is safe using only limited past data, even when control actions are unevenly restricted. Their method produces a simple test that tells you whether a command will keep the system safe despite uncertainties. They show this works with a vehicle example where safety matters and data is limited.
Open → 2610.01820v1

Multi-objective agent-based control improves vehicle flexibility and efficiency

Multi-Objective Agent-Based Model Predictive Controller for Plug-and-Play Vehicle Control

Abstract: Functional integration is a growing trend in vehicle control, often involving the coordination of multiple controllers to achieve various objectives simultaneously. The need for flexibility and reliability has led to a "plug-and-play" approach in control system design, which presents challenges for traditional integrated model predictive control (MPC). Agent-based model predictive control (AMPC) has recently emerged as a distributed solution that treats controllers as agents, creating a collaborative framework among them to reach a common goal. However, this approach struggles to manage distributed conflicting objectives when agents are coupled or interdependent. To address this, we propose a novel, practical distributed control scheme called multi-objective AMPC, which adapts the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) into a general control strategy that approximates global optimization while decoupling objectives. We systematically develop three formulations that maintain convergence while addressing control regularization and inequality constraints, applying them to complex vehicle control systems for the first time. The proposed method has been tested on two vehicle control scenarios with a multi-objective topology. Different formulations are compared through simulations, and the most computationally efficient one was implemented on an electric vehicle for real-world evaluations. The results demonstrate that the proposed multi-objective AMPC can converge approximately to the same global optimum as integrated MPC with greater flexibility and the potential to reduce computational costs.

Thu 10 SeptRobotics
The gist
Controlling modern vehicles often requires balancing several goals at once, like safety, comfort, and energy use. The authors propose a new way to let multiple vehicle controllers work together as independent agents, each with its own goal, while still cooperating to achieve the best overall result. They developed a system that helps these agents solve conflicts and constraints efficiently, tested it in simulations, and on a real electric vehicle. Their method approximates the best combined control strategy but with more flexibility and possibly less computing power than traditional methods.
Open → 2609.12108v1

Learning agent control improves vehicle performance and safety

Learning Agent-based Model Predictive Control for Holistic Vehicle Performance

Abstract: Agent-based model predictive control (AMPC) has recently been proposed as a distributed scheme that collaborates with all agents to achieve optimal holistic performance. However, its optimality highly depends on the prediction accuracy that requires all agents or their contributions to be known, which is too idealistic for actual implementation. This research proposes a novel practical hybrid control scheme - learning agent-based MPC (LAMPC), combining the model-based AMPC approach and data-based learning methods to improve the holistic vehicle performance for multi-agent systems. The Gaussian process regression (GPR) enhanced by an online data management strategy serves as the learning core to predict unknown contributions. A novel multi-step prediction mechanism leverages the GPR learning potential along the horizon. The predicted mean, representing the learned unknown contributions, completes the system model in the MPC for more accurate control. Meanwhile, a stochastic framework is formulated to guarantee control safety and feasibility using soft chance constraints based on the prediction variance. Both simulations and experiments show that, with the learning capability, LAMPC outperforms the traditional AMPC. LAMPC can achieve higher tracking performance in well-learned scenarios and always guarantee constraint satisfaction even in less-learned scenarios. Moreover, the proposed hybrid control scheme is efficient for real-time implementation and is flexible to any control agent topology.

Thu 10 SeptRobotics
The gist
Controlling vehicles with many independent parts working together is hard because it's difficult to predict how each part will behave. The researchers propose a new control method that combines traditional mathematical models with machine learning to better predict unknown behaviors. This approach uses data collected while the vehicle operates to improve predictions and control safety, even when not all behaviors are well understood. Their method performs better than older ones in tests, ensuring the vehicle follows commands accurately and safely.
Open → 2609.11871v1