Papers for

tts system developers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Expert supervision affects text to speech quality in complex ways

Does Expert Supervision Improve Text-to-Speech? An Empirical Study of Preference Optimization

Abstract: Preference optimization promises to improve text-to-speech (TTS) systems by learning which speech outputs are better. External expert speech seems a natural source of preferred responses, especially when student generations contain errors. Yet demonstration quality does not establish whether the student can benefit from that supervision, or whether better target fitting will produce better speech. We examine this gap across two TTS students using real and synthetic expert speech, comparing preference objectives and direct versus bridge supervision while tracking fixed-sequence likelihoods and generation metrics. With expert supervision held fixed, objectives differ markedly in their sensitivity to preference-score scaling and the resulting generation quality. Likelihood diagnostics characterize these responses, but cannot establish their benefit: expert likelihood can increase while intelligibility worsens, or decrease while it improves. Bridge supervision highlights a distinction between mitigating degradation and improving the student: it can recover performance lost under direct training without consistently surpassing the pretrained base. Route benefits vary across objectives, students, and expert sources; neither route consistently dominates. Together, these findings distinguish demonstration quality, target fitting, and generated-speech quality as complementary criteria for assessing expert supervision.

Sun 18 OctSound
The gist
Improving text-to-speech (TTS) voices by learning from expert examples sounds promising, but it’s not clear if just copying better examples helps. The authors studied how using expert speech affects TTS models in different ways, revealing that better matching to expert voices doesn’t always mean better sounding or clearer speech. They found that supervision approaches can help avoid worse performance but don’t guarantee improvements beyond the original model. This shows that judging TTS improvements requires looking beyond just copying expert speech.
Open → 2610.25292v1

Method calibrates gender bias in instruction text to speech models

Training-Free Instruction TTS Gender Bias Calibration Using Model-Adaptive Steering

Abstract: Instruction text-to-speech (ITTS) systems systematically encode acoustic gender skews from descriptive style prompts, such as occupations or personas, even when demographic attributes are left unspecified. Calibrating the implicit gender distribution of the synthesized voices, across heterogeneous architectures and without model retraining or overriding explicit user prompts, is an open problem. In this work, we propose \textit{model-adaptive steering}, a training-free bias calibration method that steers post-encoder conditioning representations using a group deviation vector paired with a coarse-to-fine strength search on a development set. A deterministic lexical gate bypasses intervention whenever explicit gender keywords are detected, preserving intended prompt semantics. Evaluated on a 12,800-prompt held-out benchmark across four ITTS models (three architectures), the proposed method reduces aggregate calibration error from 11.5--28.1 to 0.8--5.9 percentage points (e.g., shifting Parler-TTS Mini from 78.1\% and PromptTTS++ from 27.3\% female to 50.8--52.4\%). Output rates stay within 0.9 pp across anchor set sizes at fixed operating points, while UTMOS decreases by at most 0.08 and WER degrades by at most 3.3 pp.

Wed 7 OctSound
The gist
Text-to-speech systems sometimes change the voice gender based on style prompts like job titles, even when no gender is specified. This paper introduces a way to adjust these systems without retraining, to make the gender distribution in generated speech more balanced. The method uses adjustments to the model’s internal signals and avoids changing voices when explicit gender words are given. The approach was tested on multiple different text-to-speech models and showed it can reduce gender bias while keeping speech quality high.
Open → 2610.09831v1