Papers for
travel app developers
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Eco-friendly trip planner cuts travel time and carbon in major cities
An Eco-Friendly Tourism Trip Planner Driven by Z-Number Uncertainty: Evidence from Baku, Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Tashkent, and Istanbul
Abstract: Deployed tourism trip planners ingest travel times and ratings as exact numbers, although routing services return travel times that vary with the hour of departure and a platform rating may rest on a handful of reviews or on tens of thousands. We present an eco-friendly trip planner that represents both quantities as Z-numbers, which pair a fuzzy restriction on a value with a fuzzy reliability on the evidence behind it, and that constructs them directly from routing-service observations at six departure hours and from platform review counts rather than from linguistic elicitation. A hybrid loss combines score, carbon, travel-time, and reliability terms, and an adaptive large neighborhood search returns single-day itineraries with per-leg reliability annotations through a conversational front end. We compare the planner with a crisp-mean baseline under an identical optimizer in Baku, Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Tashkent, and Istanbul, with fifteen points of interest and thirty seeds per city, and we evaluate the selected itineraries on their trip carbon and their total travel time. Pooled over 150 seed-paired runs, the planner lowers trip carbon from 3.24 to 2.61 kg (19.3%, Wilcoxon p = 0.017; city-clustered bootstrap interval 6.4% to 26.7%) and travel time from 123 to 109 minutes per trip (11.5%, p = 2.8e-10; interval 5.0% to 18.2%). The travel-time reductions survive a Holm correction in Baku, Istanbul, and Abu Dhabi, the carbon reduction is significant in Baku and large but uncertain in the dispersed catalogs of Dubai and Abu Dhabi, and neither metric changes in Tashkent. Review counts were measured for Baku and estimated for the other four cities, and the comparison involves a single baseline, so the results establish feasibility and direction rather than a general advantage. Code, routing caches, frozen routing tables, and per-seed results are openly released.
Image context improves recommendations when combined with other signals
Seeing the Context: Enhancing Recommender Systems with Image-Derived Contextual Signals
Abstract: Contextual information, capturing the circumstances of a user-item interaction, is central to recommender systems. Prior work draws context from location, time, or reviews, but not images; multimodal recommender systems mainly use images to enrich item or user representations, not identify situational context. We propose a new representation of context derived from images, spanning physical, social, and modal categories learned via a vision-language model. We introduce ICE-Fuse, a pipeline for evaluating this representation that fuses these categories and integrates them into a context-aware recommender system, using TripAdvisor data and Review-aware Graph Contrastive Learning as the recommendation algorithm. Image context does not outperform established signals standalone, but improves them combined, indicating complementary information. Semantic analysis shows image- and review-derived context capture distinct aspects of the interaction, positioning images as complementary context.
How constraints and preferences shape travel planning actions
How Constraints and Preferences Shape Travel Planning: Implications for AI Planning Support
Abstract: Planning is a common yet complex activity shaped by constraints to satisfy and preferences to balance. Travel planning, as both an everyday activity and a frequent benchmark for evaluating intelligent systems, offers a rich context for examining how constraints and preferences emerge and evolve. While recent AI systems have achieved impressive results in generating personalized itineraries, they often assume that users can articulate stable goals upfront. To understand how real-world planning unfolds, we conducted a two-part interview study: one with eight travelers reflecting on their planning experiences, and one with nine travel agents sharing professional practices. We trace the dynamics of constraints and preferences as they are surfaced, refined, and coordinated throughout the planning process, and identified 11 actions revolving around constraints and preferences, which shaped the planning process. We offer design heuristics for planning tools that better support human-AI collaborative actions to support the fluid, contingent nature of planning.