Papers for
transportation simulation developers
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Map-conditioned model generates human movement adapting to map edits
Editable Map-Conditioned Trajectory Generation for Human Mobility Simulation
Abstract: Geospatial simulation of infrastructure interventions requires mobility generators that respond directly to edited maps, yet many data-driven generators do not expose the map as an editable condition. We formulate this task as map-conditioned autoregressive generation of human mobility: a road raster conditions a decoder that emits nominal 31.25 m mesh-cell tokens at one-minute intervals. The mesh-local vocabulary supports held-out and locally edited maps without retraining or vocabulary changes. We instantiate a ResNet-50 visual-prefix configuration and a Vision Transformer (ViT) cross-attention configuration, trained from scratch on 87,400 smartphone-derived trajectories from 874 meshes in Ishikawa Prefecture, Japan; 219 meshes are held out. We evaluate map sensitivity by comparing correct-map and within-split shuffled-map generations with held-out real trajectories. On the 110-mesh test split, for the ResNet-50 configuration, correct-map generations are closer than shuffled-map generations on 60% of meshes under Hausdorff-based energy distance (p = 0.021), while DTW is directional but inconclusive (57%, p = 0.074); correlation with real density is 0.38 with the correct map versus 0.01 with shuffled maps. The ViT configuration shows weaker trajectory-level sensitivity and smaller density gains. An illustrative bridge-removal edit changes generated continuations without retraining. Together, these results support the feasibility of editable-map human-mobility simulation.
Aurora framework makes air ground co simulation more reliable and verifiable
AURORA: A Natural Language-Driven Agentic Framework for Understanding, Reasoning, and Orchestrating Reliable Air-Ground Co-Simulation
Abstract: Air-ground transportation research increasingly relies on co-simulation, yet constructing scenarios remains labor-intensive and difficult to validate. More importantly, a generated scenario may execute successfully while failing to realize the spatial, temporal, communication, or behavioral relationships requested by the user. This paper presents AURORA, a natural-language-driven agentic framework that treats air-ground scenario generation as a process of compilation with verification. Central to AURORA is the Air-Ground Scenario Graph (AGSG), a typed intermediate representation that explicitly connects agents, aerial missions, events, communication links, success conditions, and their cross-domain dependencies. This shared representation enables simulator-grounded parsing, joint road-airspace grounding, temporal planning, pre-execution feasibility checking, trace-based runtime verification, failure localization, and bounded repair within a unified workflow. We further introduce AURORA-Bench to evaluate not only whether generated scenarios execute, but whether they faithfully realize the requested interactions. Experiments across multiple language models show that structured execution substantially improves reliability, while runtime verification exposes silent failures that completion-based evaluation overlooks. Localized repair further resolves many violations without regenerating the entire scenario. The results show that reliable scenario generation requires verifying realized behavior, not merely executable code, and demonstrate the value of explicit intermediate representations for verifiable and repairable language-driven co-simulation.