Papers for
transportation analysts
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Two stage method improves detecting air trips from incomplete mobile data
A Two-Stage Hybrid Framework for Inferring Air Trips from Mobile Location-based Service (LBS) Data under Incomplete Airport Sightings
Abstract: Mobile device location-based service (LBS) data provide large-scale spatiotemporal observations that can help airport planners understand air travelers' mobility patterns. However, airport sightings are often missing before or after flights, making strictly rule-based detection incomplete. This study develops a two-stage framework to infer U.S. domestic air trips from large-scale LBS data under incomplete airport sightings. Stage 1 uses heuristic rules to identify high-confidence air trips whose endpoints are observed at two distinct airports. Stage 2 addresses latent air trips with a probabilistic model that infers air routes using spatial proximity, temporal compatibility, and historical flight schedule information. Using January 2022 nationwide LBS data with nearly 10 million users and 131 million sightings, results are validated against T-100 Domestic Segment route benchmarks and a Stage 1 pseudo-ground-truth reference set. The framework increases air route coverage from 10.65% under Stage 1 to 50.60% and recovers nearly all top-1,000 benchmark routes. It improves Spearman rank correlation with T-100 route shares from 0.4490 to 0.7630 and reduces Jensen-Shannon divergence from 0.2808 to 0.2263. Stage 2 also recovers 92.2% of Stage 1 reference trips. This study formalizes three endpoint observation regimes for LBS-based air trip inference (airport-observed, semi-observed, and latent) and helps airport agencies identify domestic air travel patterns missed when airport sightings are incomplete.
New regression method improves prediction under rare data shifts
CVaR anchor regression protects against rare shifts
Abstract: We study prediction in new environments when training data contain rare, large shifts. Anchor regression penalizes the average of the squared mean residual across environments. It protects against shifts in an ellipsoid determined by the second moment of the training shifts. Covering rare shifts may therefore require a large penalty, expanding the ellipsoid in every direction and reducing accuracy on common environments. We propose CVaR anchor regression, which replaces the average of the squared mean residuals with a tail average. Unlike CVaR or GroupDRO applied directly to prediction risks, it does not give environments more weight solely because their noise levels are high. We prove an exact worst-case risk guarantee under a linear structural model that allows for heteroscedastic noise. For discrete environments, decreasing the CVaR tail fraction expands the robustness set from an ellipsoid to a scaled convex hull of the training shifts and their negatives. A separate parameter controls its scale. Examples show how the method can improve protection against rare shifts while retaining accuracy on common environments. We illustrate the method on New York City taxi data.
Urban models improve decisions by comparing activity to local baselines
Measuring Decision-Scale Use in Tool-Augmented LLMs: A Contrastive Urban Benchmark
Abstract: Urban decision-support often asks whether activity is unusually high or low for a specific place, not which place has the larger raw count. Twenty pickups in a quiet neighborhood can be more abnormal than 180 at an airport. We introduce URBANCONTRASTIVEQA, a benchmark that asks whether tool-augmented language models can make this baseline-relative comparison. Each item pairs two urban situations from public mobility data in NYC, Chicago, and Seattle, labeled by how far current activity deviates from that place's historical baseline. We evaluate six instruction-tuned models under five tool-output formats. With only raw counts, models often pick the larger number even when it is less abnormal for its zone. Server-computed baseline scores and ordinal labels raise accuracy, but gains vary by model. For heterogeneous urban feeds, tool interfaces need to expose local baselines, not just activity volumes. We release the pair bank, labels, scoring scripts, and data card.
Urban region embeddings improve by combining mobility flow and connectivity patterns
Synergistic Fusion of Topological Structure and Temporal Semantics of Mobility for Urban Region Embedding
Abstract: Urban region embeddings have shown promising results in diverse urban sensing tasks such as crime, income, and service-call prediction. Recent methods improve representation quality by integrating mobility data with auxiliary modalities, using cross-view attention or contrastive objectives to align heterogeneous features into a unified region representation. However, leveraging the temporal dynamics of human mobility remains under-explored. Regional inflow and outflow fluctuate throughout the day, and inter-region connections emerge, persist, and dissolve over time. Moreover, prevailing fusion strategies combine views additively and miss the joint signal that emerges only when views co-occur. To address these gaps, we propose Mobility Stream-Structure Synergy (MoSS), which derives complementary views from mobility data: a Sequence view that preserves each region's hourly inflow/outflow profile, and a Structure view based on zigzag persistence diagrams that capture how regional connectivity emerges, persists, and dissolves over time. A synergy module then extracts emergent representations from the co-occurrence of these views through multi-degree interactions, explicitly capturing higher-order signal across views. Extensive experiments on New York City and Chicago show that MoSS achieves state-of-the-art performance across three downstream tasks using mobility data alone, outperforming baselines that rely on auxiliary modalities.