traffic management operators

Abstract: Pedestrian tracking in video is important for applications such as surveillance and scene analysis, but it becomes more challenging in crowded scenarios with frequent occlusions and rapid motion. This paper analyzes how detector architecture, model scale, scene density, and inference regime affect the tracking of multiple pedestrians. We compare the YOLO11, RT-DETR, and YOLO26 detector families with the ByteTrack and BoT-SORT trackers on sequences from the MOT17, MOT20, and SOMPT22 benchmarks. For YOLO26, we also compare traditional overlap filtering via Non-Maximum Suppression (NMS) with end-to-end inference. The RT-DETR family achieved the highest mean scores on the HOTA tracking quality metric across all three benchmarks with both trackers, with a more pronounced advantage on MOT20, albeit at a higher computational cost. On MOT17 and SOMPT22, YOLO26 variants, especially YOLO26-L with NMS, offered favorable combinations of quality and speed compared with RT-DETR. In the YOLO26 inference comparison, the end-to-end mode did not yield consistent tracking gains over the NMS-based regime. Taken together, these results provide a practical guide for selecting detectors and trackers for this task based on application priorities.

Abstract: Large-scale applications of lifelong multi-agent path finding (LMAPF) call for computationally inexpensive movement decisions under changing traffic conditions and across varied layouts. We propose a navigation policy in which a convolutional network computes a shared spatial field over the map once per timestep and a compact goal-conditioned operator derives agents' movement preferences. The complete policy is trained end-to-end using average-reward reinforcement learning with throughput as the reward, without planner demonstrations or a separate online path planner. For structured and unstructured layouts, we train one policy per class on mixtures of small maps and deploy each without retraining on larger, unseen layouts and agent populations. Across six layouts with 10000 agents, our policies achieve throughput comparable to or higher than the strongest evaluated baselines. The proposed method has an average execution time below 10 ms per step, more than an order of magnitude faster than several established planners.

Abstract: Traffic signal control (TSC) is essential for mitigating urban congestion. Recent advances in vision-language models (VLMs) enable richer interpretation of intersection scenes, opening new opportunities for visual-context-aware TSC. However, the loose coupling and repeated information conversion between modules can lead to the loss of fine-grained visual details, while sequential inference introduces substantial latency. To address these limitations, we propose VLALight, a lightweight end-to-end vision-language-action framework that directly maps intersection observations and signal-phase information to discrete signal actions. To handle the multi-view nature of TSC, VLALight combines multiple directional camera views into a unified visual input and uses textual instructions to establish their correspondence with traffic movements and signal phases. This design enables direct action prediction with a compact 0.5 B-parameter model, without intermediate image-to-text descriptions or handcrafted traffic-state representations. Experiments show that VLALight delivers the best emergency-vehicle service of all compared methods, reducing pooled emergency waiting time by 21.1% over the cascaded VLMLight while running in real time on local hardware and generalizing to unseen intersection topologies and traffic-flow patterns.

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to make predictions from numerical time-series histories and textual events. Yet accuracy alone cannot reveal whether correct answers reflect effective integration of the two inputs or instead arise from event polarity, unimodal priors, or superficial cues. Likewise, plausible explanations may rationalize predictions without faithfully reflecting the evidence that drives model behavior. We introduce TimeLitmus, a diagnostic benchmark for cross-modal understanding and explanation faithfulness in event-conditioned time-series prediction. TimeLitmus contains 4,856 evaluation records across Finance and Traffic, combining natural prediction with controlled counterfactual and contrastive interventions, explanation-targeted faithfulness tests, and systematic shortcut controls. Across ten representative LLMs, standard prediction accuracy substantially overstates reliable cross-modal understanding: Hard Paired Contrast (HPC) pair correctness peaks at only 19.2% in Finance and 11.7% in Traffic, and all ten models show lower-than-expected consistency on Finance series-side controls. Models often recognize scenario relations explicitly yet fail to apply them during independent prediction. Explanation faithfulness shows a similar gap: in Traffic, most models cite the manipulated temporal factor in over 90% of cases, while behavioral support remains below 22%. Human annotators outperform LLMs on matched controlled and hard-pair diagnostics, confirming that these distinctions are recoverable from the inputs. Natural-only adaptation yields selective gains in evidence selection and input sensitivity, but not consistent gains in controlled or hard-pair behavior. The benchmark, evaluation suite, and supervised adaptation data will be released publicly.