Papers for

synthetic data providers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Synthetic face data similarity does not always mean privacy leaks

Not All Similarity Is Leakage: Distribution-Aware Identity Leakage Assessment in Synthetic Face Datasets

Abstract: Synthetic data provides the means for more ethical and less biased facial recognition. Nonetheless, the limitations of generative models and the conditioning process they rely on pose a risk of identity leakage, resulting in synthetic samples that are overly similar to those seen in a generator's training set, mitigating privacy benefits. In this work, we show that previously proposed approaches are affected by two key limitations: high classifier dependence and a tendency to identify leakage with respect to real datasets that were not used in training. To address these shortcomings, we propose a novel metric called Scaled Overlap (SO), which adapts a non-parametric data-copying test for facial recognition and extends it to the identity level. By leveraging a multi-model setup that compensates for errors in individual classifiers, it provides insights into the true strength of identity leakage. Our analysis identifies leaking datasets (CemiFace, SFace2, IDNet) with the most acute leakage introduced by generative model conditioning in CemiFace, demonstrates that real datasets do not contribute equally to generator training, and shows that the majority of synthetic images are drawn from multiple identities rather than relying on a single identity. Ultimately, our study provides new insights into the quality of synthetic datasets and gives more reliable techniques to help the community ensure the trustworthiness of synthetic data.

Mon 19 OctComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Synthetic facial images can help protect privacy, but sometimes they look too much like real people used to train the models, causing privacy issues. The authors found that previous ways of spotting this problem had flaws, so they created a better method called Scaled Overlap to measure true identity copying more accurately. Their findings show that some synthetic datasets have more identity leakage than others and that most synthetic images mix features from different people instead of copying just one. This helps improve how we trust and use synthetic face data.
Open → 2610.26077v1

Control constraint satisfaction in data generation with primal dual flow matching

Primal-Dual Flow Matching for Sample-Wise Constrained Generation

Abstract: We consider the problem of learning to generate data while satisfying a prescribed \emph{sample-wise} constraint with a user-specified probability of constraint satisfaction. Starting with a population-level constrained negative log-likelihood minimization and using a flow-matching (FM) parameterization, under regularity assumptions and sufficient expressivity of the velocity field family, we derive guarantees on the probability of constraint satisfaction for the corresponding primal-dual optimization algorithm. We provide a practical implementation of this approach, called Primal-Dual Flow Matching (PDFM), which has direct control over constraint satisfaction rate and requires only binary membership oracle feedback for constraint satisfaction, avoiding the need for differentiable distances, projections, or special structure of the constraint set, such as convexity. We show that PDFM improves constraint satisfaction over vanilla FM and achieves competitive performance against constraint-aware baselines while maintaining distributional fidelity. Our code is available at https://github.com/ZhengyanHuan/PDFM.

Thu 8 OctMachine Learning
The gist
Generating new data samples often needs to meet specific rules or constraints, but making sure these rules are met can be tricky. The authors present a method called Primal-Dual Flow Matching (PDFM) that learns to generate data while ensuring the rules hold with a certain user-chosen probability. Their method only needs to know if a sample passes the rule or not, without needing complicated math about the rule's shape. They show that PDFM better satisfies these constraints compared to previous methods without losing the quality of the generated data.
Open → 2610.12699v1