Papers for

surgical navigation teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Cross modality tumour localisation improves liver cancer surgery guidance

Reinforcing intra-operative tumour localisation with weak supervision from pre-operative appearances

Abstract: Limited tumour visibility on intra-operative images complicates surgical navigation, including liver hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) targeting on computed tomography (CT) imaging. This makes labelled datasets difficult to curate for deep learning, and transferring pre-operative delineations through registration remains challenging due to intra-operative deformation and lack of paired pre- and intra-operative data. We propose to transfer tumour appearances learned from pre-operative magnetic resonance (MR) images to guide localisation on intra-operative CT through weak supervision. A classifier is trained to classify tumour presence on pre-operative images. This is applied to windows on intra-operative images, and despite the domain gap, it assigns higher tumour-presence probabilities on average to tumour-containing windows. These weak cross-domain signals guide a reinforcement learning agent to localise tumours on intra-operative images. We compare direct transfer, few-shot adaptation and synthetic transfer (trained using unpaired MR and CT), which translates CT into synthetic MR before localisation. On an external HCC cohort, synthetic transfer outperformed other tested methods and CT-only baselines. Our framework enables cross-modality tumour localisation without paired MR-CT training images.

Thu 22 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Finding tumours during surgery is hard because images taken during the operation don’t show tumours clearly and change shape compared to pre-surgery scans. The authors found a way to use information learned from pre-surgery MRI scans to help locate tumours on CT images taken during surgery without needing matching pairs of images. They use a computer program to guess where tumours might be by learning weak signals from one kind of image and guide tumour detection on another. This method worked better than others tested on liver cancer cases.
Open → 2610.31253v1

Liver surgery guidance improved with scale-free 3d model alignment

Landmark-Free and Scale-Blind Multi-View Registration of Preoperative Liver Models to Intraoperative Surfaces

Abstract: Augmented-reality guidance in laparoscopic liver resection requires aligning preoperative 3D liver models from CT/MRI with intraoperative surfaces. Monocular reconstruction in most cases cannot guarantee scale, albeit rigid-motion registration requires scale as an input. Our proposed framework ``SimCompose'' estimates the full similarity transformation $\Sim$, including scale, without relying on landmarks and applies the same transformation across multiple views with known relative geometry. However, reliable detection of registration failures remains challenging in surgical settings, where ground-truth alignment is generally unavailable. For this, we propose a geometry-based selector that evaluates candidate transformations without requiring ground truth. Large disagreement among these transformations is used to flag potentially unreliable registrations. Finally, we propose to use a non-rigid refinement based on a low-dimensional deformation model from Neo-Hookean simulations in the Simulation Open Framework Architecture (SOFA), without additional network training. SimCompose is trained exclusively on synthetic partial views. Its encoder processes point clouds normalised to a unit root-mean-square radius, without access to metric scale, and filters each view before multi-view fusion. Evaluation on unseen synthetic data (300 single-view pairs per run; 100 three-view registrations) shows that multi-view integration and candidate selection increase the success rate under stringent $\Sim$ accuracy criteria from 38.4% for a single-view, single-method configuration to 77%. Existing learning-based baselines do not satisfy these criteria even when provided with the exact scale. On five in-vivo patients with 92 keyframes, the rigid registration stage reduces surface error more than three-fold relative to learning-based baselines with external scale information.

Fri 16 OctComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionArtificial IntelligenceHuman-Computer Interaction
The gist
Aligning 3D models of a liver taken before surgery with the actual liver surface during surgery helps doctors work more precisely. The difficulty is that images taken during surgery often don't have a correct size scale, making alignment tricky. The authors created a method called SimCompose that figures out the right size and position automatically without needing special markers. Their system also checks if the alignment might be wrong and can fine-tune the match by allowing small, realistic deformations. Tests show this method works better than previous ones, including on real patient data.
Open → 2610.24218v1

Markerless spinal tracking validated using routine intraoperative X-rays

Bridging the Markerless Tracking Validation Gap: Intraoperative X-ray Workflow Integration

Abstract: Markerless intraoperative tracking of spinal anatomy via RGB-D sensors is a promising alternative to invasive bone-anchored fiducials, yet no existing clinical dataset provides independent subsurface ground truth for validating these methods. We address this gap with a clinically viable pipeline that derives per-vertebra 6-DoF pose from routine intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy, co-registered to the RGB-D camera frame through a multimodal fiducial array detectable in both imaging modalities. Critically, the pipeline requires no additional radiation, instrumentation, or deviation from standard surgical workflows, relying solely on the fluoroscopic images already acquired during routine level checks. A calibrated transform chain links the vertebral pose recovered via multi-view 2D-3D CT-to-fluoroscopy registration to the RGB-D coordinate frame, enabling direct comparison of any markerless registration estimate against a subsurface reference. Ex vivo validation against optically tracked ovine vertebrae confirms end-to-end accuracy of 2.06 +- 0.29 mm and 3.35 +- 0.93 degrees, sufficient to serve as independent ground truth for methods with substantially larger errors. We demonstrate the pipeline's utility by evaluating two markerless registration strategies on clinical data spanning 11 vertebrae across 1,500 frames from three surgical sequences: the first such evaluation against an independent subsurface reference in a clinical setting. The proposed framework provides reusable infrastructure for benchmarking emerging markerless tracking methods on real surgical data.

Thu 15 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Tracking the spine during surgery without attaching markers to bones is safer but hard to check for accuracy. The authors created a method that uses regular X-ray images taken during surgery to find the exact position of each vertebra and matches this to data from a special camera. This approach doesn't require extra equipment, changes to surgery, or additional X-rays. They tested it on animal bones and surgical data, showing it works reliably to measure how well markerless tracking methods perform.
Open → 2610.21696v1

Evaluating models for improving real-time endomicroscopy image alignment

Evaluating Transformation Models for pCLE Mosaic Registration

Abstract: Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (CLE) provides real-time, cellular-resolution optical biopsy but has a narrow field of view, which image mosaicing can extend to provide anatomical context. Because of line-by-line acquisition, probe motion, and probe-tissue interaction, frame alignment generally requires a non-linear transformation whose accuracy is difficult to quantify: flexible transformation models can fit intensity features and noise, so appearance-based metrics such as Normalized Cross-Correlation (NCC) can improve without a genuine gain in geometric accuracy. We therefore establish a dataset of 132 frame pairs across fourteen pCLE sequences from 4 patients with manually annotated landmark correspondences, so that Target Registration Error (TRE) can serve as a geometrically grounded complement to NCC. We assess the effect of progressively increasing the transformation model's degrees of freedom, from translation to Thin Plate Spline (TPS), and of six feature-matching backends spanning classical (Shi-Tomasi, Lucas-Kanade) and learned (SuperPoint, SuperGlue, LightGlue, LoFTR, RoMa) approaches. Translation and rigid models prove insufficient under tissue deformation, while TPS with random sampling achieves the strongest landmark-derived alignment of the evaluated configurations; among the learned matchers, used without fine-tuning, only RoMa offers a robust, if modest, advantage over other methods. At the sequence level, pairwise registration quality proved an unreliable predictor of final mosaic quality, so mosaic quality must be evaluated directly rather than inferred from pairwise metrics.

Mon 21 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (CLE) lets doctors look at cells inside the body in real time, but each image covers only a small area. To see a bigger picture, the images need to be stitched together exactly, which is tricky because the tissue can move and change shape. The authors created a dataset with marked points to measure how accurate different image alignment methods are. They found that simple techniques don’t handle tissue movement well, and that more flexible models work better, though some advanced AI methods showed only slight improvements. Also, aligning pairs of images well does not always guarantee good quality for the entire stitched image.
Open → 2609.24560v1