Papers for
structural engineers
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Structural topology optimization using graph based neural methods
HGTO: A Unified Graph-Based Physics-Informed Formulation for Structural Topology Optimization
Abstract: Density-based topology optimization is typically structured as a nested sequence of material updates, structural analyses, and sensitivity assessments. While neural density parameterization and dual-field physics-informed approaches provide data-free alternatives, most existing methods represent density and displacement as coordinate fields and make limited use of the discrete relationships inherent in the finite element mesh. The present study introduces HGTO, a unified graph-based formulation that extends complete neural topology optimization from coordinate space to finite-element graph space. Element densities are parameterized on the element graph derived from the mesh, and the structural state is determined on the corresponding node--element hypergraph. Finite element kinematics, numerical quadrature, constitutive response, and force assembly remain explicitly defined operations within the differentiable computation. The material field and equilibrium state are therefore coupled through a common finite-element incidence structure. Numerical studies show compliance comparable to conventional density-based optimization at substantially lower computational cost than a representative coordinate-based dual-field neural method. The same coupled formulation accommodates high-resolution and irregular meshes, three-dimensional structures, finite deformation, and elastoplastic response.
Graph neural operator predicts concrete stress during high speed impacts
Field-level prediction of mid-plane stress tensor fields in concrete target penetration: a cross-velocity graph neural operator surrogate
Abstract: Although the impact resistance of concrete has been studied extensively, a framework linking mesoscale heterogeneity to full-field stress-tensor prediction has been lacking. Data were generated with a full-scale aggregate-resolved LS-DYNA model (projectile diameter 45 mm, mass 2.13 kg, target diameter 500 mm x thickness 200 mm, mesh 10 mm), verified against published penetration experiments (Frew 2006, Hanchak 1992, Forrestal 1996) by configuration similarity. The dataset contains six-component stress-tensor fields on the X-Z mid-plane for 400 cases (4 impact velocities x 100 aggregate seeds). Three contributions are reported. First, case-by-case verification of the terminal penetration state delimited the rest-state validity of penetration depth and anchored reliable observables to rigid-body motion and field-level stress evolution. Second, a field-level graph neural operator surrogate learned the time-varying stress-field evolution and evaluated cross-velocity leave-one-out extrapolation. Third, the full-scale, aggregate-resolved, cross-velocity, per-seed database was established as a reproducible resource. Cases at 100, 135 and 200 m/s still moved at window end (negative velocity, i.e. rebound), and only one 165 m/s case arrested. Penetration depth is therefore not reported as a rest-state scalar except for the single arrested case (69.33 mm); nose-node depth differences were confirmed as numerical artifacts of displacement integration after erosion. The single-step relative L2 error was 0.6977, reported honestly; autoregressive rollout from frame 11 to 39 took about 144 ms, a speedup of about 3.6x10^3 to 4.3x10^3 relative to single-core LS-DYNA, reported as application value. Validation is bounded by configuration similarity and field-level self-consistency; the framework is a simulation-trained decision-support method within the studied parameter space.