Papers for

sports performance coaches

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Reliability-gated fusion improves lower-body 3d pose from consumer imu devices

Reliability-Gated Fusion of Consumer Head and Foot IMUs for Lower-Body 3D Pose

Abstract: Sparse inertial pose estimation promises camera-free motion capture from consumer devices, but consumer sensors are unreliable: firmware-fused orientations are biased, mounting varies between sessions, and streams drift or drop out. On a new 35-take single-subject benchmark pairing an earbud head inertial measurement unit (IMU) with two smart-insole foot IMUs (SAM-3D-Body pseudo-ground-truth labels), we show the reliability problem is channel-level: a channel ablation isolates foot acceleration as the most informative input (66.6 mm vs. 79.0 mm head-only) and the firmware-fused foot orientation as the liability that destroys the gain. We therefore let the model learn how much to trust each channel of each stream: one temporal gate per stream per channel block, trained with an auxiliary reliability objective on synthetically corrupted pretraining data. The channel-gated model is the most accurate of our learned fusion arms on clean data (69.4 mm vs. 83.7 static, 86.6 ungated) and under every simulated fault (bias in training; drift, dropout eval-only); its gates suppress the natively biased foot-orientation channels on clean real data without test-time supervision and flag dropout bursts at 0.92-0.999 AUROC. Two contrasts: dropping a channel known a priori to fail is flat across foot faults but collapses when an unanticipated stream fails (head dropout: 92.9 vs. 79.3 mm); and a fine-tuned HMD-Poser is more accurate on clean data (64.4 mm) and nominally under drift, with no significant paired difference under bias or dropout, but a larger worst-case degradation from clean (+16.1 vs. +3.5 mm, single seed). Learning to gate reliability instead of sensor count is the lever for deployable sparse inertial capture. Code is available at https://github.com/ZhilinGuo/reliability-gated-imu-fusion.

Mon 28 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionHuman-Computer Interaction
The gist
Measuring body movements without cameras can be tricky with common sensors found in everyday gadgets because these sensors sometimes give unreliable data. The authors studied how to better combine signals from a head sensor (like in earbuds) and foot sensors (smart insoles) to capture leg movements more accurately. They found some data from the foot sensors were often misleading and so taught a model to decide which sensor signals to trust at different times. This method made pose estimates more accurate and robust, even when sensors fail or drift over time. Their approach can help make motion capture from simple sensors more dependable and practical.
Open → 2609.35764v1

Prosthesis aware 3D human pose estimation improves motion capture

Prosthesis-Aware 3D Human Pose Estimation: A Dataset and Benchmark for RSP Users

Abstract: Recovering 3D human body motion from video is important for applications such as rehabilitation assessment and sports performance evaluation. For prosthesis users, this requires capturing both natural body joints and the geometry of the prosthetic device, a challenge that existing methods are not designed to address. Model-based estimators rely on body models trained on non-amputee individuals and cannot represent prosthesis geometry, while model-free methods lack body kinematic priors and are unreliable under occlusion. This challenge is particularly prominent for users of running-specific prostheses (RSPs), where the RSP has a complex curved geometry and moves dynamically during exercise. To fill this gap, we collect RSP3D, the first 3D dataset of RSP users, covering essential daily-life and exercise actions from participants with varied amputation conditions, using a multi-camera marker-based motion capture setup. We formally define the task of prosthesis-aware 3D pose estimation, evaluate representative methods in a zero-shot setting, and confirm their individual limitations. We further propose a hybrid baseline combining model-based body joint estimation with model-free RSP shape recovery, establishing a starting point for future research.

Wed 16 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Capturing 3D body movement from video helps with things like rehab and sports training but is hard for people with prosthetic limbs. Existing methods don’t work well because they don’t understand prosthesis shapes or movement. The authors created a new dataset of people using running-specific prostheses (RSPs) to help machines learn these special cases. They tested current methods and introduced a combined approach to better estimate the body and prosthetic pose together.
Open → 2609.18406v1