Papers for
space mission operators
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Robots safely push objects in space using human guidance
Multi-Agent Transportation of Free-Flyers in Microgravity Via Pushing Interaction Under Human-in-the-Loop Control
Abstract: We propose a safety-critical framework for the cooperative transportation of passive targets in microgravity, where a team of chaser robots acts through unilateral pushing contacts to track a human-provided desired twist while ensuring safe target motion. The pushing-only nature of the interaction introduces sparse, configuration-dependent actuation constraints requiring chasers to physically relocate on the target body when the desired pushing allocation changes. To address these challenges, we formulate a delay-aware feedback control architecture leveraging Control Lyapunov Function (CLF) and Control Barrier Function (CBF) constraints within a mixed-integer thrust allocation program to enforce stability and safety of the target, respectively. The proposed framework enables reference tracking while guaranteeing obstacle avoidance with a circular obstacle despite intermittent control authority, providing a foundation for human-supervised cooperative transportation of free-flyers in space environments. The proposed framework is validated through Gazebo simulations.
Autonomous spacecraft maneuver planning improves collision avoidance under uncertainty
Chance-Constrained Belief-Space Maneuver Planning for Autonomous Collision Avoidance Under Uncertainty
Abstract: Increasing conjunction frequency in low Earth orbit places growing pressure on spacecraft operators to determine not only whether an encounter requires mitigation, but whether sufficient information is available to commit to a maneuver. This work formulates this information-action tradeoff as a belief-space planning problem for conjunctions between a maneuverable spacecraft and an unmaneuverable secondary object. The planner represents the uncertain orbital states as Gaussian beliefs and uses a chance-constrained belief-space Monte Carlo tree search framework to reason over possible future tracking updates before time of closest approach (TCA). A terminal chance constraint limits the probability of reaching TCA above a prescribed collision-risk threshold, allowing the planner to wait for informative tracking while intervening when deferral becomes too risky. We evaluate the approach on eight historical conjunctions from NASA's Conjunction Assessment Risk Analysis dataset. By varying the secondary-object measurement quality and tracking cadence, we generate a total of 96 distinct evaluation scenarios. Across the evaluated conditions, the planner reaches TCA without maneuvering in approximately 40% of episodes while maintaining no terminal collision-risk violations. In contrast, fixed-time rule-based maneuver policies resolve more encounters without maneuvering when intervention is deferred closer to TCA, but at the expense of increasing terminal risk violations. The fraction of episodes reaching TCA without maneuvering depends strongly on tracking quality and measurement cadence, ranging from 76% under accurate, frequent measurements to approximately 18%-20% under the poorest tracking conditions. These results show that tracking quality and frequency are not only inputs to collision-risk estimation: they can determine when intervention becomes necessary.