Papers for
software engineers deploying ai models
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Decision model factory builds fast specialists with improved accuracy
Decision Model Factory: Building Specialized Sovereign Decision Models
Abstract: Decision needs vary with each application, language, and deployment environment. The Decision Model Factory turns those needs into specialized, sovereign models on demand. A brief recipe guides the training, calibration, verification, and evaluation of a selected backbone, delivering a deployable decision model under the operator's control. The same workflow creates a new specialist whenever the requirements change. Across Japanese decision tasks, compact deployment, and long-context passage ranking, five factory-built models improve upon their backbones; three surpass the strongest results in a fixed public Japanese benchmark comparison. A dedicated runner computes only permitted-answer probabilities and reuses shared context, more than doubling serving speed on matched multi-question workloads with essentially unchanged decision scores. Together, the factory and runner make fast, task-specific decision models practical to build and deploy whenever needed.
Upcycling pretrained large language models with efficient gated layer loops
UpLoop: Upcycling Large Language Models with Gated Loop
Abstract: Looped large language models trade parameter storage for recurrent computation, but most are trained from scratch. In practice, pretraining with looped depth is expensive, making post-training upcycling of a pretrained non-looped LLM an attractive alternative. We introduce \textbf{UpLoop}, a post-training recipe based on \emph{layer-wise} recurrence. Instead of looping a whole model or a middle block, UpLoop loops each selected layer locally, preserving the pretrained depth hierarchy and avoiding feature-space mismatch. To make loop execution useful, we add hidden-wise gates on the attention and MLP residual branches, so later loops act as progressive refinements rather than redundant rewrites. Empirically, UpLoop breaks the commonly observed saturation at two loops ($R=2$) in prior looped models. Starting from Qwen3-4B Base and applying SFT, UpLoop improves the average accuracy across 20 benchmarks by 6.17\% at $R=3$. We use $R=3$ as the main setting for the best accuracy--cost trade-off, while both native and extrapolated $R=4$ yield further gains.