Papers for

software developers in computational physics

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Hybrid neural network method improves solving complex physics problems

A Hybrid Physics-informed holomorphic neural networks Method

Abstract: Physics-informed holomorphic neural networks (PIHNNs) exploit complex-analytic representations to satisfy homogeneous PDEs by construction, but their extension to nonhomogeneous problems is nontrivial. We propose a hybrid physics-informed holomorphic neural network (HPIHNN) framework based on a decomposition of the solution into particular and homogeneous components. The particular component is computed by a spectral method on a simple extended domain, while the homogeneous component is approximated by a PIHNN trained only on the boundary with modified boundary data. The resulting formulation avoids meshing complex geometries and retains the dimensionality-reduction advantage of holomorphic representations. The method is applied to nonhomogeneous Poisson, Stokes, biharmonic, linear elasticity, and Helmholtz equations. Numerical experiments covering complex geometries, corner singularities, and nearly incompressible regimes demonstrate that the proposed method accurately resolves the corresponding solutions and, in the considered tests, generally achieves lower errors and shorter training times than standard PINNs. The results indicate that coupling spectral particular solutions with holomorphic neural approximations provides an efficient approach to nonhomogeneous PDEs on complex domains.

Wed 28 OctMachine Learning
The gist
When solving certain complex physics problems using computers, it’s hard to handle equations that don’t fit easily into existing methods. The authors combined two techniques: one that breaks down the problem into simpler parts and another that uses a special type of neural network related to complex math. Their approach avoids complicated mesh setups and works well on tricky shapes and conditions. Tests show their method is often faster and more accurate than standard approaches.
Open → 2610.38269v1

Physics informed neural networks adapt online to solve partial differential equations better

PINNMorph: Evolving Online Adaptation Policies for Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) provide a learning-based framework for solving partial differential equations (PDEs), yet their training behavior can change substantially throughout optimization. Residual distributions, gradient interactions, regional learning difficulty, and model-capacity requirements may evolve over time, while the network architecture and major training mechanisms are typically determined before training. We propose PINNMorph, an online PINN adaptation framework based on large language model (LLM)-guided policy evolution. PINNMorph maintains a population of state-conditioned adaptation policies that map execution diagnostics to controlled interventions over topology modification, additive representation augmentation, objective balancing, gradient handling, adaptive sampling, and optimizer-phase control. At each intervention opportunity, candidate programs are instantiated from the current policy population, selected according to the observed training state, and applied directly to the PINN under training. The resulting model inherits its existing parameters and training state and continues optimization along the same trajectory. Execution outcomes are subsequently used to evaluate interventions and evolve the policy population. Unlike pre-training architecture search or fixed adaptation rules, PINNMorph jointly adapts the current PINN and the policies governing its interventions using feedback from actual training. Experiments on 13 PDE benchmarks show that PINNMorph achieves lower solution errors than SA-PINN, ConFIG, RoPINN, HARMONIC, and PINNsAgent across all evaluated problems. Ablation studies further examine the effects of online adaptation, state-conditioned intervention selection, and execution-feedback-driven policy evolution.

Sat 26 SeptArtificial IntelligenceMachine Learning
The gist
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) use machine learning to solve complex mathematical equations called partial differential equations (PDEs). The authors found that fixed network designs and training rules can limit performance because the problem changes during learning. They created PINNMorph, a system that changes the network’s structure and training steps dynamically based on how well it is learning, guided by policies evolved from experience. This approach improved accuracy compared to previous methods on many test problems.
Open → 2609.32685v1

AI agents create specialized neural solvers for complex physics modeling

AutoPDEBench: Benchmarking LLM Auto-Research for Neural PDE Solver Design

Abstract: Partial differential equations (PDEs) are essential for modeling complex physical systems, and neural solvers have recently emerged as powerful data-driven tools for numerically solving them. However, existing neural solvers struggle with domain-specific challenges, such as varying parameters and high-speed flows, necessitating specialized architectures. Manually designing these specialized solver architectures is a highly iterative, time-consuming process requiring deep expertise, creating a significant bottleneck in scientific discovery. We propose leveraging autonomous AI research agents to automate the synthesis of specialized solvers. To support this, we introduce AutoPDEBench, a benchmark dedicated to LLM-driven automated research for PDE solver design. The benchmark includes 25 challenging datasets featuring both novel and actively studied physical scenarios. We evaluate a suite of general-purpose models (transformer, ROM, and graph-based) alongside a multi-agent instantiation of the iterative automated research pipeline, which serves as an agentic baseline. Empirical results show that the iterative automated research system significantly outperforms the general-purpose neural solver baselines. Our findings demonstrate the viability of using AI agents to automatically design neural solvers for complex physical systems. AutoPDEBench provides a foundational testbed to accelerate agent-driven scientific discovery in physics and engineering.

Sat 26 SeptComputational Engineering, Finance, and ScienceArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Solving complex physical problems often requires specialized tools that take a long time to design. The authors introduce a new benchmark called AutoPDEBench to test AI systems that automatically design these tools, called neural PDE solvers, for different physical scenarios. They show that an AI system that iteratively improves solver designs works better than standard approaches. This makes it easier and faster to build solvers that handle tricky situations like changing parameters or fast flows.
Open → 2609.32245v1