Papers for

social policy analysts

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Mathematical measures reveal how groups interact and separate

Measuring Diversity and Segregation with Convex Functions

Abstract: The problem of segregation measurement is to quantitatively describe the interaction of a population's attributes (such as race, ethnicity, education level, or income) with a separating distinction (such as organizational rank, school district, or spatial location). This primarily expository article gives an opinionated tour of one mathematical approach to measuring segregation. We begin with some basic intuitions about diversity and unify these through the framework of convex functions on the probability simplex. Formalizing segregation as a local-to-global comparison of diversity measures, resulting in the general class of Jensen informations as segregation measurements. We describe and computationally illustrate three ways to incorporate spatial structure into segregation measurements: spatial smoothing, aggregation, and local Jensen information. We close with several suggestions for future work.

Thu 1 OctSocial and Information Networks
The gist
Measuring segregation means figuring out how different groups of people mix or stay apart based on things like race or income. The authors explain a mathematical way to do this using convex functions, which help measure diversity more clearly. They describe how to compare local and global diversity to understand segregation, calling these comparisons Jensen informations. They also show how to include location or space when measuring segregation and suggest ways to explore this research further.
Open → 2610.02446v1

Proximal balancing improves causal effect estimates with hidden confounders

Proximal Balancing for Causal Effect Estimation under Unmeasured Confounding

Abstract: Estimating causal effects from observational data is central to science and policy, but the effects are not identified when confounders are unmeasured. Proximal causal inference addresses this problem with proxies of the unmeasured confounders. However, existing proxy-based approaches either designate proxy roles and solve an inverse problem, which is ill-posed and hard to estimate with high-dimensional proxies, or use a latent-variable model, which assumes that the learned latent variable matches the hidden confounder and leaves bias when it does not. To address these challenges, we introduce proximal balancing. It carries the classical idea of covariate balancing to confounders that are observed only through proxies: it learns a low-dimensional summary of the covariates and proxies that makes the treatment groups comparable, and then adjusts for this summary. It needs no designated proxy roles, inverse problem, or latent model. We give identification theory, finite-sample guarantees, and a practical algorithm, PROBE. We demonstrate the method on low-dimensional, high-dimensional, and image proxies and on real-world data.

Wed 30 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Estimating cause-and-effect from data can be tricky when some influencing factors are hidden. The authors address this by using proxy variables—indirect clues about the hidden factors—but without needing strict roles or complex modeling. Their method, called proximal balancing, finds a simpler summary that balances groups so their hidden influences are accounted for. This approach works well for different types of data, including images, and helps make better judgments about cause and effect.
Open → 2609.40051v1