Papers for

social platform developers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Social media redesigned to prevent attention driven harm

Reclaiming the social in social media

Abstract: Concerns about polarization, antisocial behavior, and mental health have broadly led to two responses to social media: adapting platforms through moderation and prosocial design, and restricting access to these platforms through age limits and comparable measures. Both address consequences of social media while leaving the attention-driven architecture intact. We argue that the harms commonly attributed to social media arise not from technologies supporting social connection but from their implementation within the attention economy. In response, we ask what a digital social environment built for genuine human connection would look like. From four principles - Purpose, Alignment, Transparency, and Access - we can derive four technical properties that fulfill these principles: Operator Blindness, Algorithmic Sovereignty, Operational Parity, and Verifiability. To the best of our knowledge, no deployed alternative satisfies all four. We propose an architecture that does, making the attention economy not just discouraged but structurally impossible. We explain how the resulting user experience refocuses on each user's individual social environment and differs from that of current platforms.

Mon 28 SeptSocial and Information NetworksComputers and SocietyHuman-Computer Interaction
The gist
Social media can cause problems like arguing, antisocial behavior, and mental health issues, mostly because they are designed to grab and hold our attention for profit. The authors explain that these problems don’t come from the idea of connecting people online, but from how these platforms operate within an attention economy. They suggest a new way to build social media based on four key ideas—purpose, alignment, transparency, and access—that results in a system where the harmful attention-seeking design isn’t possible. Their proposed design changes the experience to focus more on genuine connections tailored to each user.
Open → 2609.35413v1

Large language model societies show coordinated collective behavior patterns

Population Physics, Population Problems: Safety and Emergence in LLM Societies

Abstract: The collective behaviour of large language model (LLM) societies is not the sum of their individual outputs. It yields statistically distinct, sometimes-unpredictable phenomena, for which the tools we use to study single agents may not scale. Due to recent incidents involving autonomous agentic systems, however, understanding these systems is paramount. For that we introduce a framework for measuring self-organisation in LLM social systems and apply it to three such systems: a Schelling grid, a social network (Moltbook), and a Twitter-like misinformation simulation ('Rogue'). All three exhibit statistically significant self-organisation. Moreover, their relaxation dynamics vary with the environmental information available to the agents, with open-ended systems (Moltbook, Rogue) exhibiting sharp, phase-transition-like dynamics. Further results show that population-level pathologies can emerge even when the LLMs are safety-tuned or monitored, being primarily driven by the coordinated activity of a population subset. We also show when self-organisation does \textit{not} emerge under two additional scenarios (a commons dilemma, GovSim, and a LLM-as-a-judge deliberation scheme, ChatEval). We argue that measuring signatures of this kind offers a lightweight, agent-agnostic diagnostic layer for detecting coordinated collective behaviour in deployed multi-agent systems without relying on natural language or model versioning.

Sun 27 SeptMultiagent SystemsComputation and Language
The gist
When many large language models (LLMs) interact in groups, their overall behavior can be surprising and different from just adding up their individual actions. The authors created a way to measure how these groups organize themselves and tested it on different simulations, including social networks and misinformation spreading. They found that groups of LLMs can suddenly shift their behavior and even develop problems, like coordinated harmful actions, even if each LLM is designed to be safe. Understanding these group effects helps detect and manage unpredictable behaviors in multi-agent AI systems.
Open → 2609.33871v1