Papers for
social network analysts
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Graph coarsening improved by geometric flow based edge weighting
Geometric Flow enhanced Graph Coarsening
Abstract: Recently, researchers have proposed a graph pooling operation, akin to the pooling process in conventional convolutional neural networks (CNN), aimed at reducing the computation cost of Graph convolutional neural networks (GCNNs). While most GCNN-based methods treat graph pooling as a node clustering problem and propose learning a cluster assignment matrix, existing clustering-based pooling methods tend to focus solely on the rough topology information of graphs, neglecting the exploitation of higher-order mutual connections among neighbors. In terms of message passing on graph, the ease of information passing on edges reflects the closeness between neighboring nodes, which significantly relies on the interconnectivity among neighbors. In this study, we address this gap by considering such local connection information and introducing a novel graph pooling method named RicciPool. We introduce discrete graph curvature, particularly Ollivier-Ricci curvature, as a measure of higher-order connectivity around an edge. Subsequently, we construct an Ollivier-Ricci flow formula to reweigh edge weights, leveraging the crucial information provided by Ricci curvature, particularly vital for extracting clusters in graphs. Building upon this foundation, we utilize the spectral clustering technique to learn a new cluster assignment matrix. Experimental results on multiple bioinformatics protein datasets and social networks underscore the effectiveness of our proposed method.
Private testing of large graphs for key properties with few queries
Private Graph Property Testing
Abstract: Graph property testing asks whether a massive graph satisfies a given property, or is far from doing so, using only a sublinear number of queries to the graph. Since property testers typically inspect only a small, randomly sampled portion of the input, they appear naturally compatible with differential privacy and privacy amplification by subsampling. Despite this, few results link these two fields. We initiate a systematic study of differentially private graph property testing with the goal of designing efficient testers with formal privacy guarantees in the dense and bounded-degree graph models. We develop new privacy amplification theorems for several widely used graph-sampling procedures such as induced subgraph sampling, random walks and k-disc sampling. We then leverage these privacy amplification techniques to design a private canonical tester in the dense graph model, as well as private bipartiteness testers and subgraph freeness testers in the dense and bounded-degree graph models. Finally, using the new privacy amplification theorem for k-disc sampling, we prove that every property of hyperfinite graphs is privately testable. The resulting query complexities of our private testers are comparable to those of their non-private counterparts.
Quantum method extracts graph balance features from spectral data
Learning structural balance of graphs from quantum spectral features
Abstract: We develop a quantum approach to spectral feature extraction from the density of states (DOS) of a problem-dependent Hamiltonian, and apply it to machine learning on signed graphs. We propose to embed a signed graph as an Ising model instance with positive and negative interactions, and use the standardized moments of the Ising DOS as features for learning. We show that these moments count signed closed walks, are switching-invariant, and are size-free by construction. As a benchmark, we target learning the frustration index, an NP-hard measure of structural balance that can be labeled exactly at moderate size. At zero field, the models can be sampled classically, allowing the quantum extraction procedure to be certified against exact ground truth. We propose DOS-QPE, a phase estimation on a purified maximally mixed probe, which samples the spectral density with orders of magnitude fewer shots than Hadamard test-based trace sampling and feeds the resulting features directly into classically trained models. On $1.4\times10^5$ labeled graphs the exact DOS determines the frustration index, and five moments recover it with a mean error of 0.4, well below one sign flip. Beyond zero field, the underlying trace-estimation problem is DQC1-complete, providing access to spectral features for which no efficient classical sampling method is known. Our work opens routes towards quantum applications in social network balance analysis, spin-glass studies, correlation clustering, and protein-interaction networks.
Benchmark compares models tracking evolving network structure and meaning
TTGBench: Benchmarking Topological Evolution and Semantic Drift in Text-attributed Temporal Graphs
Abstract: Temporal graph learning models the evolution of dynamic systems, where both structural interactions and semantic states change over time. However, existing benchmarks primarily emphasize structural evolution via temporal link prediction (TLP), while support for semantic evolution remains limited. Although temporal node classification (TNC) is sometimes included, it is typically restricted to simplistic binary settings that fail to capture realistic semantic drift. Moreover, commonly used datasets exhibit high link repetition, leading to inflated performance estimates and obscuring true model capability. To address these limitations, we introduce \textbf{TTGBench}, a new benchmark that jointly evaluates structural and semantic evolution. TTGBench comprises six real-world, text-rich datasets characterized by \emph{Dual Volatility}, enabling rigorous and fair evaluation of existing models. Notably, it is the first benchmark to support both multi-class and multi-label TNC, filling a critical gap in evaluating temporal semantic drift. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation of 17 state-of-the-art methods across Temporal Graph Neural Networks (TGNNs) and Large Language Model (LLM)-based paradigms. The results reveal a clear \emph{capability divide} between the two paradigms: TGNN-based methods excel at structural prediction but fail at semantic tracking, whereas LLM-based predictors show the opposite trend. Through in-depth analysis, we uncover their fundamental limitations and provide insights for developing more comprehensive temporal graph models.