Papers for

social data analysts

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

LLMs struggle to match age differences in loneliness in European surveys

Do LLMs Reproduce the Age Gap in Loneliness? Evaluating Survey Simulation against European Survey Data

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are often used to simulate survey respondents, but matching survey averages does not establish accurate demographic differences. We test whether LLM outputs reproduce within-country age gaps in loneliness using the 2022 EU Loneliness Survey, comparing adults aged 18-34 and 65 or older in France, Italy, Poland, and Sweden. We evaluate simulation with and without age information and direct distribution estimation against a probability-based sample, with a non-probability sensitivity reference. Both human samples show higher mean loneliness among younger adults. Under age-specified simulation with standard response-option order, Mistral Small 4 and GPT-5.6 Terra reverse this ordering under all three prompt framings in three and two countries, respectively, mainly by overestimating older-adult means. DeepSeek V4 Flash preserves the ordering everywhere but underestimates both group means, with errors largely cancelling in France and Italy. Against the probability-based reference, direct estimation has lower absolute age-gap error than simulation for Mistral and Terra in every country. For DeepSeek, simulation has lower gap error but direct estimation has lower group-mean error; these comparisons depend on low-validity older-adult simulation cells. Evaluating LLM outputs as proxies for age groups within countries therefore requires checking both group means and their contrast against human survey data.

Sun 18 OctComputation and Language
The gist
People often use large language models (LLMs) to mimic answers from different groups in surveys, like how lonely different ages feel. This paper checks if LLMs can correctly show that younger adults tend to feel lonelier than older adults in four European countries. The researchers found that some LLMs got this backward, saying older adults were lonelier, while others underestimated loneliness levels but kept the right order. The study shows it's important to carefully check both group averages and differences if using LLMs to simulate survey data about age groups.
Open → 2610.25158v1

Pre-trained language models accurately link records and infer ethnicity from names

Pre-Trained Language Models as Zero-Shot Tools for Social Science Research

Abstract: Record linkage and demographic inference from names are routine demands in social science. Most approaches to these problems require labeled training data that are difficult or costly to acquire. I show that pre-trained language models perform both tasks accurately without requiring task-specific training. For record linkage, I introduce EnsembleLink, an algorithm that uses pre-trained embeddings alongside string-based scorers to retrieve a short list of candidates and then identify the likeliest matches. EnsembleLink matches or exceeds the performance of most prior approaches while generalizing across scripts and formats that those methods are unable to handle. For ethnicity inference from names, I show that large language models (LLMs) achieve up to 83.8% accuracy on U.S. voter files, compared to 78.0% for name-supplemented BISG. Open-weight models offer reproducible implementations that approach these models in accuracy. Moreover, LLMs are able to infer group membership for religious, caste-based, and other ethnic group categories outside of the United States, and reduce bias in downstream estimates of geographic racial gaps. Where pre-training encodes the world knowledge required by each task, task-specific labels add less information.

Tue 13 OctComputation and Language
The gist
Many social science tasks need to match records or guess people’s ethnicity using their names, but getting good training data for this is hard. The paper shows that large language models, which are already trained on lots of text, can do these tasks well without extra training. They introduce a method called EnsembleLink for matching records that works better than many past approaches, even across different languages and formats. Also, these models can guess ethnicity more accurately than some common techniques and can handle groups beyond the U.S. This means the knowledge learned by the models is often enough for these tasks without needing specific extra examples.
Open → 2610.19048v1

Language model privacy improved with survey data protection methods

Differential Privacy Protected Preference Alignment on Survey Derived Data

Abstract: Preference alignment enables language models to better reflect human values, but the preference data contains sensitive information, especially when derived from surveys about political beliefs, social norms, religion, gender attitudes, and cultural values. This paper studies privacy-preserving alignment on questionnaire-derived data from the World Values Survey, where supervision takes the form of ordinal labels rather than standard pairwise rankings. Existing efforts mainly focus on general privacy protections upon model training, while data-specific methods for survey data remain unexplored. We first show the vulnerability of aligned models, then formulate the task as rating prediction and introduce label differential privacy. Building on this formulation, we construct a differential private pipeline utilizing three privacy mechanisms: randomized response, exponential mechanism, and DP-SGD. Experiments show that simple label-level mechanisms outperform gradient-level methods, and proper aggregation function for preprocessing also make large contribution. The new fine-grained private comparison motivates explorations toward language model alignment with formal privacy guarantees.

Mon 12 OctCryptography and SecurityComputation and LanguageMachine Learning
The gist
Language models learn human preferences to better reflect values, but this data often includes private information from sensitive surveys. This paper studies how to protect privacy when training models using survey answers ranked in order rather than typical ranking formats. The authors develop methods that add protections at the data label level, finding these simple steps work better than more complex approaches modifying training gradients. Their work paves the way for safer language model training with privacy guarantees.
Open → 2610.16458v1

Large language models reduce well-being differences but keep social patterns

Large Language Models Substantially Compress Well-Being Inequality but Largely Preserve Its Socioeconomic Structure

Abstract: Research using large language models (LLMs) to generate synthetic populations has repeatedly shown that model outputs compress the diversity of human experience. This has raised doubts about whether LLM-generated data can capture meaningful differences within populations. We show that such compression does not necessarily erase the social structure of human heterogeneity. Using 93,901 respondents from 66 countries and territories in Wave 7 of the World Values Survey, we ask six LLMs to predict respondents' life satisfaction from demographic, socioeconomic, and attitudinal profiles. All six models substantially understate the overall dispersion of life satisfaction. Yet after normalizing for these differences in scale, they largely reproduce the human income gradient in well-being inequality: lower-income groups remain relatively more heterogeneous than higher-income groups. The pattern is robust to country fixed effects, equal-country weighting, WVS survey weights, and observed demographic composition, and it extends directionally to employment, education, and perceived control. Fidelity is weaker for extreme outcomes and country-specific gradients. These results show that the amount of heterogeneity preserved by an LLM and the way that heterogeneity is distributed across social groups are distinct properties. LLM-generated populations can therefore substantially compress human variation while retaining meaningful information about where that variation is concentrated.

Sun 27 SeptArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Measuring how happy people are can be tricky, especially when using computer-generated data. The authors found that large language models tend to show less variation in life satisfaction than real survey data. However, these models still capture important social patterns, like how people with lower incomes tend to have more variation in happiness than wealthier groups. This means such models compress differences but preserve where those differences matter most.
Open → 2609.33055v1