Papers for

smart building engineers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Digital twins must include human and social system factors

Missing Dimensions: Integrating Human and Social Systems into Digital Twin Engineering

Abstract: Digital twins (DTs) have emerged as a key technology at the core of digital transformation, yet their engineering practice remains too narrowly focused on engineered and natural systems. This paper argues that four system dimensions must be explicitly recognized in DT engineering: Engineered, Natural/Biological, Human, and Social. Each dimension brings distinct properties, modeling requirements, and ethical obligations that fundamentally shape what a DT must represent and how it must be built. We further argue that as DTs extend into the Human and Social dimensions, the emphasis should shift from automated control toward decision support and occupant empowerment. We illustrate our arguments using a smart building as a running example and identify four open research challenges for multi-dimensional DT engineering.

Thu 10 SeptSoftware Engineering
The gist
Digital twins are computer models that replicate real-world systems for monitoring and control. But most digital twins only focus on physical or natural elements, leaving out humans and their social interactions. The authors say we should build digital twins that also model human behavior and social dynamics, which means shifting from just automatic control to helping people make decisions. They use smart buildings as an example and highlight challenges in creating these multi-dimensional digital twins.
Open 2609.12131v1

Networked sensors improve message decoding from physical signals

Networked Embodied Communication: From Collective Distinguishability to Communication Reliability

Abstract: Embodied agents need to convey information to surrounding infrastructure, but their active communication interfaces may be unavailable, constrained, or intentionally inactive.Their ability to manipulate physical states offers a complementary path: messages can be encoded in deliberately selected configurations and recovered through infrastructure sensing. This principle underlies embodied communication. Yet physical differences do not guarantee distinguishable messages: a single sensing viewpoint may leave ambiguities that repeated sensing cannot resolve. This paper develops networked embodied communication, where distributed access points (APs) jointly observe message-bearing scatterer positions under fixed illumination.Under a correlated Gaussian sensing model, we characterize the additional distinguishability supplied by receive APs, establish exact redundancy conditions, and reveal how distinctions absent from individual observations can emerge through cross-AP statistical relationships. We then establish the exact asymptotic optimal maximum-error behavior of a finite alphabet under repeated independent sensing. The largest group of indistinguishable messages determines the error floor; once all messages are distinguishable, the minimum pairwise Chernoff information determines the error exponent. For a given alphabet, receiver cooperation can therefore eliminate an error floor that repetition at any individual AP cannot overcome. Building on these results, we derive finite-budget reliability conditions and jointly design the receive AP set and message-bearing positions. Numerical results show that the proposed search closely approaches exact benchmarks on reduced instances with substantially fewer candidate evaluations than exhaustive enumeration, while receiver cooperation reduces the sensing intervals needed to guarantee reliable decoding.

Mon 7 SeptInformation Theory
The gist
Some devices communicate by physically arranging parts so nearby sensors can read hidden messages. But if sensors see the message only from one spot, they might get confused by similar-looking signals. The authors show that using multiple sensors working together helps clear up these ambiguities, making messages more reliable to decode. They also find the best ways to place these sensors and arrange message parts to reduce errors efficiently.
Open 2609.06969v1