Papers for

service operations teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Ai deployment changes worker behavior in customer calls early in day

When Better Opportunities Backfire: Service Worker Responses to Parallel AI Deployment in Customer Acquisition

Abstract: As AI voice agents get deployed in high-volume contact centers, firms can route low-intent leads to AI and allocate high-intent leads to human workers. Drawing on sequential search theory, we posit that AI-induced task allocation reshapes work, enriching opportunities facing human workers but also raising their reservation value for continuing with the lead in hand, making them less willing to persist. We study the effects of an AI voice-agent deployment at a Chinese online health-insurance brokerage using more than a half million customer outreach records surrounding the rollout. Adopting a regression-discontinuity-in-time design, we trace how worker behavior changes across the workday. Results show that the enrichment of human-facing opportunities concentrates early in the workday, raising the probability that a call is a high-intent lead by about 23 percentage points on the first three calls and fading to zero later. However, customer acquisition by human workers declines precisely where the enrichment is greatest, falling about 5 percentage points on the first three calls and flattening over the day. Consistent with the theorized reservation value mechanism, workers reallocate their earliest leads about 8 percentage points more often and persist less with them, shortening those calls by about 13%. A calibrated decomposition analysis further shows that the modest gain from improved lead ordering is outweighed by a much larger negative behavioral response. By reshaping the quality and within-workday distribution of opportunities, parallel AI deployment alters how workers pursue tasks, highlighting opportunity distribution as an important service operations state variable beyond workload and congestion.

Mon 19 OctArtificial IntelligenceEmerging TechnologiesHuman-Computer Interaction
The gist
The paper studies how introducing AI voice agents in a call center changes the way human workers handle customer calls. When AI takes over less promising leads, humans get more high-quality calls early in their workday. Surprisingly, instead of improving outcomes, humans become less willing to keep trying on these early calls and end up acquiring fewer customers. The authors show that this is because workers value their opportunity to wait for better leads more, so they shorten calls and reallocate customers more quickly. Overall, this changes the daily workflow and reduces human effectiveness despite better calls.
Open → 2610.25603v1

Probabilistic forecasting improves timing predictions in business processes

Probabilistic Forecasting of Business Process Executions with Neural Temporal Point Processes

Abstract: Operators of service-based systems act on forecasts of how a running execution will continue, and such a forecast is actionable only if its reliability is known. Mainstream deep-learning models for this task are discriminative and deterministic: they emit a single next activity and a single remaining-time estimate, without a distribution to reason over. We instead cast the problem as generative sequence modelling with marked temporal point processes, which define a joint density over the next mark and its inter-event time and therefore deliver predictive distributions by construction. Real event logs violate the simple-point-process assumption these models rest on, since consecutive events frequently carry identical timestamps; we handle such ties explicitly and combine a transformer encoder with a mixture decoder over inter-event times, trained by exact log-likelihood. On ten public logs, the resulting model matches discriminative baselines on point accuracy, dominates them on the calibration and sharpness of remaining-time distributions, and is the cheapest at inference, since a full predictive distribution is obtained in a single forward pass without sampling.

Fri 18 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Predicting what happens next in business workflows helps companies plan better, but knowing how reliable these predictions are is crucial. The authors developed a way to make forecasts that not only guess the next action but also provide a sense of uncertainty about when it will happen. Their method uses a special type of model that treats actions as events happening over time and can handle situations where multiple actions occur simultaneously. Tested on real data, their approach matched or outperformed existing methods in accuracy and gave better estimates of timing uncertainty, all while being computationally efficient.
Open → 2609.21382v1