Papers for

semiconductor device engineers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Physics-informed model predicts p-n diode behavior with uncertainty

A physics-informed uncertainty-aware surrogate for $p$-$n$ junction diodes

Abstract: We develop an uncertainty-aware physics-informed surrogate for a one-dimensional $p$-$n$ junction diode, conditioned on device length, doping and bias. Using the internal state of the device as predicted by the surrogate we develop a test-suite of quantities of interest including the terminal current, depletion width, peak field and stored charge. The formalism and the quantities are can be extended to asymmetric junction and two-dimensional diodes as shown by means of benchmark analysis. For the one-dimensional symmetric junction surrogate, we obtain 0.11% median $L_1$ error on the electrostatic potential, and 1.5% and 0.61% on the electron and hole densities. Finally, we develop an uncertainty analysis which determines the validity of surrogate answer within the user-specified tolerance.

Thu 29 OctMachine Learning
The gist
Modeling how p-n junction diodes behave can be complex and time-consuming. The authors developed a physics-based model that predicts diode characteristics like current and electric fields by using inputs such as device size and voltage. Their approach also estimates how confident the predictions are, so users know when to trust the results. This makes understanding and designing diodes faster while still being accurate.
Open → 2610.39993v1

Machine learning speeds up finding defects in semiconductors

Prescreening Point Defects in Semiconductors With Machine Learning

Abstract: High-throughput calculations using density-functional theory (DFT) are commonly used to explore point defects for applications in power electronics and quantum technologies. There is currently a major shift away from these traditional simulation techniques towards machine learning (ML) methods. We explore a class of physics-guided ML models for predicting defect formation energies and zero-phonon lines (ZPL) to identify point defects for quantum applications. The models are specifically targeted for use in a prescreening step for accelerated high-throughput workflows, and are therefore designed to avoid the costly relaxation step typically present with ML interatomic potentials (MLIPs). We compare performance for single and double point defect systems in 4H-SiC with ridge, kernel ridge, and multilayer perceptron (MLP) models using three different descriptors representing the defect systems. For vacancies and substitutions, the optimized models give mean absolute errors (MAEs) of 0.437 eV for the formation energy and 0.202 eV for ZPLs, which is just above the level at which such predictions can be useful even beyond the targeted prescreening, i.e., in some applications they may completely replace the need for costly DFT calculations. For interstitials the MAEs are larger, 1.101 eV for the formation energy and 0.230 eV for the ZPL, which, while still useful for prescreening, will not generally be useful for more detailed characterization. Hence, while the results may be further improved by model design and optimization, the models presented in this work are already useful for prescreening in high-throughput characterization of point defects.

Sun 13 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Finding tiny flaws called point defects in materials used for electronics and quantum devices usually takes a lot of computer time. The authors studied how machine learning can quickly guess important properties of these defects without slow simulations. They tested different machine learning models to predict energies and light emission features for common defects in a silicon carbide material. Their models work well enough to help quickly narrow down which defects to study further, cutting down on costly calculations. This could make searching for useful defects faster and less expensive.
Open → 2609.14846v1

Agent speeds up calibration of oxide semiconductor transistor models

Agentic TCAD Calibration Workflow for Oxide Semiconductor Transistors

Abstract: Experimental TCAD calibration is essential for predictive technology modeling of emerging oxide semiconductor transistors. However, it remains time-consuming and expert dependent because of model ambiguity. Multiple physical models and parameter sets can reproduce the same measured transfer characteristics, while local fitting alone cannot uniquely identify the underlying device physics. We present the first demonstration of an agentic TCAD calibration workflow for a fabricated bottom-gate In--W--O (BG-IWO) transistor. Starting from the measured transfer curve and device information, the workflow uses measurement--TCAD residuals and local sensitivity tests to select bounded parameter corrections or evaluate additional physical models, and accept only updates that improve device metrics. The LLM agent orchestrates the workflow, while Sentaurus governs the device physics. For the 2\%-W reference device, five agent-suggested updates yield a fixed calibrated model, reducing the multi-metric device objective $J$ by 14.3$\times$. Maximum $V_{\mathrm{th}}$/$I_{\mathrm{on}}$ errors are 36.1~mV/0.022 decade for varying-drain-bias tests and 46.2~mV/0.062 decade for varying-channel-length tests, demonstrating model transferability across bias and geometry rather than a local parameter fit. W-composition tests provide process-sensitive insight. This agentic workflow provides a faster route to model development for emerging device technologies.

Thu 10 SeptArtificial IntelligenceMachine Learning
The gist
Calibrating computer models to match how new oxide semiconductor transistors behave is usually slow and needs experts. The authors created a system where a smart agent helps adjust the model parameters automatically by testing different changes and only keeping those that improve the match. This method was tested on a specific transistor type and showed better accuracy across different conditions without manual tuning. It offers a faster way to develop reliable models for new transistor technologies.
Open → 2609.12184v1

AI enhances semiconductor device design and defect discovery with TCAD data

AI and TCAD for Inverse Design and Defect Discovery: From Simple Machine Learning to LLM

Abstract: AI has revolutionized various engineering domains, but its impact on semiconductor device design and defect discovery is still limited, due to limited data and the curse of dimensionality. In this paper, we will discuss our work on using the Technology Computer-Aided-Design (TCAD) to generate precise data needed for machine learning (ML) to enable simulation-augmented ML. We demonstrate that with minimal domain expertise, it is possible to create a machine that performs as well as a device engineer on a specific task. We will show that auto-encoder-based machine learning models and noise engineering applied to TCAD data are effective at learning latent physics, and that the models can be seamlessly applied to experimental data. We will demonstrate how to build a device-engineer-level model step by step through various examples, including using only non-destructive electrical data to inverse-engineer the PiN diode layer thickness variations, the Ga2O3 Schottky diode doping and anode workfunction variations, and the transistor contact resistance in an inverter. Examples also include the generation of a FinFET IV/CV prediction model, the mapping between transistor images and IV curves, and the automatic calibration of TCAD parameters for a Ga2O3 Schottky diode, which can only be handled well by experienced TCAD engineers. Finally, to fully realize the potential of AI, large language models (LLMs) and multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) are believed to be necessary. We will discuss the application of LLMs to TCAD command file creation and our vision for MLLMs in automated device design and defect discovery.

Mon 7 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Designing semiconductors and finding their defects is tricky because there's not enough data and the problems are very complex. The authors show how using computer simulations called TCAD can create accurate data that helps AI models learn much better. They teach AI to perform as well as expert engineers by using special machine learning techniques on this simulated data. They also explore how large language models might help automate designing devices and discovering defects in the future.
Open → 2609.07046v1