security teams for ai products

Abstract: The emergence of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) has established a robust foundation for Large Reasoning Models (LRMs). While deep reasoning is widely believed to enhance safety alignment, the stability of alignment mechanisms under extended reasoning remains underexplored. This paper challenges the prevailing view by revealing a critical vulnerability: Deep Reasoning May Induce Alignment Collapse. To rigorously quantify this phenomenon, we propose the Alignment Loss Rate (ALR) metric. Our experiments demonstrate that as reasoning depth increases, ALR rises significantly, indicating a severe degradation in model robustness against external perturbations. Capitalizing on this instability, a novel jailbreaking paradigm, Reasoning Trap (RT), is proposed. RT induces the model into extended reasoning to amplify the impact of adversarial attacks, leading to a sharp decline in safety capabilities. To elucidate the mechanism behind this collapse, we identify Attention Dilution as the root cause, arising from the competition for attention between the extended reasoning process and the original input. To mitigate this, Reasoning Residual Alignment (RRA), a lightweight defense strategy that dynamically re-emphasizes the input via residual connections integrated with the reasoning process.

Abstract: Natural adversarial examples (NAEs) reveal that vision models can fail under realistic semantic changes beyond norm-bounded perturbations. However, generating NAEs in a black-box setting remains challenging because existing generative attacks often rely on surrogate models, learned attack priors, or costly query-based optimization, whereas the natural transformations that expose model vulnerabilities are unknown a priori. We propose \textbf{Adversarial Scenario Attack (ASA)}, a query-based black-box framework that searches over natural-language editing scenarios using a multimodal language model and a modern text-guided generative editor. ASA jointly explores background, weather, and material/color transformations through winner--loser feedback, and uses a greedy explorer to compose only attack-improving scenarios. Across diverse ImageNet classifiers, ASA achieves substantially higher attack success rates than prior query-based generative attacks while requiring fewer victim-model queries and preserving competitive perceptual quality. Moreover, ASA exhibits both image-level and prompt-level transferability: its adversarial images remain effective across victim-model architectures, while its discovered editing scenarios can be reused across same-class images and, in some cases, across architectures. These findings suggest that vision models possess reusable vulnerabilities to natural transformation patterns, which ASA can efficiently identify in a black-box setting.