Papers for

security operators

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Grounded descriptions improve recognizing everyone in multi-person videos

Grounded Human-Attributed Description and Activity Recognition in Videos

Abstract: Understanding characteristics and activities of individuals in complex multi-person environments is crucial for real-world applications. However, existing datasets often simplify this problem to grounded group activity recognition, single-person activity recognition, or close-set activity recognition, thus limiting the generalizability of models trained on these datasets. In this work, we introduce the task of Grounded Human-Attributed Description and Activity Recognition (GHADAR), which involves describing the characteristics and activity descriptions of \textbf{every} person in a video, provided the location of the person in the video, which is more practical for real-world applications. To facilitate this, we introduce a new dataset derived from AVA-Actions by generating open-set captions for the person description and activity. In addition, we propose a novel method to effectively utilize the information contained in grounding during training by constraining the cross-attention masks during training in VLMs to improve performance for this task. Our experiments show that our method outperforms SOTA VLMs on this task. Finally, we demonstrate the limitations of existing evaluation metrics, which are overly reliant on human-annotations and exact text-text matching. As an added video-based evaluation, we propose a holistic VLM-based evaluation schema that compares concepts {\em directly} between the video and the generated predictions. Thus, in this work, we develop a complete framework for GHADAR, including a dataset, a novel method and an evaluation schema, thereby establishing a strong foundation for future research in this domain.

Thu 15 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Recognizing what many people are doing in a busy video is tough, especially when the activities and details are varied and open-ended. The authors introduce a new task to describe each person’s characteristics and actions in videos, using their exact location to better understand them. They created a new dataset with detailed captions for many people doing different activities in the same video. To do this better, they designed a new training method that helps the model focus on the right person. They also suggest a fresh way to evaluate how well these models work by comparing the video directly with the model's descriptions.
Open → 2610.22295v1

Vision language models struggle to match vehicles across front and back views

Front-to-Back: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models for Asymmetric Cross-View Vehicle Re-Identification

Abstract: Matching the same vehicle across front and rear cameras is difficult because the cameras do not share a view and the vehicle's appearance changes substantially. We introduce Front2Back-ReID, a benchmark of 500 manually verified vehicle handovers from 20 recording sequences in South Africa. Each example asks a model to match a vehicle highlighted in a front-camera image to the same vehicle among at least three candidates in a later rear-camera image. We evaluate seven zero-shot vision-language models, four image-retrieval baselines, and 25 human participants. Models are tested using full front RGB images, cropped target vehicles, and binary silhouettes. The strongest VLM achieved 76.6 percent Rank-1 accuracy on target crops, compared with 74.0 percent for the frozen SigLIP2 baseline; this difference was not statistically clear. Human participants achieved 94.0 percent accuracy with full images and 92.2 percent with target crops. Under our evaluation setup, enabling reasoning improved accuracy across all three input conditions for every model evaluated in both modes. We also found that VLMs generally performed worse on full scenes than on target crops. These results show that general-purpose VLMs do not yet consistently outperform strong visual retrieval for front-to-rear vehicle matching, while humans remain substantially more reliable.

Wed 30 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Matching a vehicle seen from the front camera to the same vehicle seen later from a rear camera is hard because the views look very different. The authors created a dataset called Front2Back-ReID with real vehicle images from South Africa to test this challenge. They compared seven different vision-language models, traditional image retrieval methods, and 25 humans. The best AI model could correctly match cars about 76% of the time, while humans did much better, around 94%. This shows current AI models still struggle compared to people at matching vehicles from very different camera angles.
Open → 2609.39492v1