Papers for

security operation centers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Black-box testing reveals major risks in autonomous AI agents

Black-Box Red Teaming of Agentic AI: A Taxonomy-Driven Framework for Automated Risk Discovery

Abstract: Agentic systems are rapidly moving to production, where they read untrusted inputs, call tools with real permissions, and act autonomously, expanding the security surface beyond chat-only models. Yet standard evaluations remain single-turn and fail to capture multi-step agent vulnerabilities. We present a systematic black-box framework for risk-aware agent evaluation requiring only basic system descriptions. Our approach introduces: (1) a seven-domain taxonomy mapping observable behaviors to risk categories, (2) fully automated SAGE-RT red teaming producing 120 adversarial scenarios per domain, and (3) human-validated evaluation using LLM judges. Empirical validation across two agent architectures (CrewAI and AutoGen) with four base models reveals alarming patterns: 56.25\% average governance risk, 65\% privacy risk in multi-agent configurations, and agent behavior vulnerabilities reaching 85\%. Our black-box approach effectively identifies critical architectural vulnerabilities without privileged access, providing a scalable path toward safer agent deployments.

Wed 9 SeptArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Many new AI agents act on their own and use outside tools, which can create security risks. The authors developed a way to test these AI agents without special access, by automatically generating tricky situations they might face. Their tests found that these AI systems often have serious risks related to rules, privacy, and unsafe behavior. This approach can help make AI agents safer before they are widely used.
Open 2609.09647v1